Investigating Feminicide in Mexico. The Conversation Management Approach proposal

1Alison L.J., Alison E., Noone G., Elntib S. & Christiansen P. (2013), Why tough tactics fail and rapport gets results: Observing Rapport-Based Interpersonal Techniques (ORBIT) to generate useful information from terrorists. Psychology, public policy, and law, 19 (4), 411.Search in Google Scholar

2Boyce P. & Barriball E. (2010), Circadian rhythms and depression. Australian Family Physician, 39 (5), 307.Search in Google Scholar

3Boyle M. & Vullierme J.-C. (2018), A brief introduction to investigative interviewing. A practitioner’s guide. European Committee for the Prevention of Torture.Search in Google Scholar

4Bull R. (2014), When in interviews to disclose information to suspects and to challenge them?. In: Investigative interviewing (pp. 167–181). Springer, New York, NY.Search in Google Scholar

5Bull R. (2018, November), PEACE‐ful Interviewing/Interrogation. In: Diversity in Harmony: Insights from Psychology-Proceedings of the 31st International Congress of Psychology (p. 191). John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

6Bull R. & Milne B. (2004), Attempts to improve the police interviewing of suspects. In: Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 181–196). Springer, Boston, MA.Search in Google Scholar

7Bull R. & Rachlew A. (2019), Investigative interviewing: From England to Norway and beyond. In: Interrogation and torture: Research on efficacy, and its integration with morality and legality, pp. 171–196.Search in Google Scholar

8Bull R. & Baker B. (2020), Obtaining Valid Discourse from Suspects PEACE-fully: What Role for Rapport and Empathy? In: M. Mason, F. Rock (ed.), The Discourse of Police Interviews, University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

9Cape E. & Young R. (eds.) (2008), Regulating policing: The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 past, present and future. Bloomsbury Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

10Clarke C. & Milne B. (2001), National evaluation of the PEACE investigative interviewing course. Police Research Award Scheme. London: Home Office.Search in Google Scholar

11Código Penal Federal de la República Mexicana, año, Tit. 19, cap. V, art. 325.Search in Google Scholar

12College of Policing (2020). Investigative Interview, https://www.app.college.police.uk/app-content/investigations/investigative-interviewing/ [Accessed 30 April 2020].Search in Google Scholar

13Dando C.J. & Bull R. (2011). Maximising opportunities to detect verbal deception: Training police officers to interview tactically. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8 (2), 189–202.Search in Google Scholar

14Dando C.J., Bull R., Ormerod T.C. & Sandham A.L. (2015), Helping to sort the liars from the truth‐tellers: The gradual revelation of information during investigative interviews. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20 (1), 114–128.Search in Google Scholar

15Davies G.M. & Beech A.R. (eds.) (2012), Forensic psychology: Crime, justice, law, interventions. John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

16Dressler J., Michaels A.C. & Simmons R. (1991), Understanding criminal procedure (p. 45). Carolina Academic Press, Durham.Search in Google Scholar

17ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) (2018), “Femicide or feminicide”, Gender Equality Observatory for Latin America and the Caribbean, https://oig.cepal.org/en/indicators/femicide-or-feminicide [Accessed 25 July 2022].Search in Google Scholar

18Ede R. & Shepherd E. (2000), Active Defence (2nd ed). Law Society Publishing, London.Search in Google Scholar

19Fahsing I. & Ask K. (2013), Decision Making and Decisional Tipping Points in Homicide Investigations: An Interview Study of British and Norwegian Detectives. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 10, 155–165.Search in Google Scholar

20Fisher R.P. (2010), Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15 (1), 25–38.Search in Google Scholar

21Green T., Ord B. & Shaw G. (2008), Investigative interviewing explained. LexisNexis, Butterworths.Search in Google Scholar

22Gierlasinski N.J. & Nixon D.R. (2014), A comparison of interviewing techniques: HR versus fraud examination. Oxford Journal: An International Journal of Business & Economics, 5 (1).Search in Google Scholar

23Gremler D.D. & Gwinner K.P. (2008), Rapport-building behaviors used by retail employees. Journal of Retailing, 84 (3), 308–324.Search in Google Scholar

24Gollwitzer P.M. (1990), Action phases and mindsets. In: E.T. Higgins (ed.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, Vol. 2, pp. 53–92. Guidford Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar

25Goodman‐Delahunty J., Martschuk N. & Dhami M.K. (2014), Interviewing high value detainees: Securing cooperation and disclosures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28 (6), 883–897.Search in Google Scholar

26Hartwig M., Granhag P.A. & Luke T. (2014), Strategic use of evidence during investigative interviews: The state of the science. In: Credibility assessment (pp. 1–36). Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

27Knoke M.E. & De Lise E.P. (2010), Professional Investigator’s Manual. ASIS International, ISBN: 978-1-93-49-04-02-2.Search in Google Scholar

28McLean M. & Roach J. (2011), The trouble with Being Human: Cognitive bias and the police interview. The Investigator Magazine. (May 2011).Search in Google Scholar

29Meissner C.A., Redlich A.D., Michael S.W., Evans J.R., Camilletti C.R., Bhatt S. & Brandon S. (2014), Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10 (4), 459–486.Search in Google Scholar

30Milne R. & Bull R. (1999), Investigative Interviewing: Psychology and Practice. Chichester: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

31Morley D.S. (2000), Psychophysiological reactivity to stress in nail biters. International Journal of Neuroscience, 103 (1–4), 139–154.Search in Google Scholar

32National Policing Improvements Agency (2009), National Investigative Interviewing Strategy.Search in Google Scholar

33Nowak M., Birk M. & Monina G. (eds.) (2019), The United Nations Convention Against Torture and its Optional Protocol: A Commentary. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

34Olmos J.G. (2012), Los brujos del poder (Los brujos del poder 1): El ocultismo en la política mexicana. Grijalbo.Search in Google Scholar

35Oxburgh G.E., Myklebust T. & Grant T. (2010), The question of question types in police interviews: a review of the literature from a psychological and linguistic perspective. International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law, 17 (1).Search in Google Scholar

36Pérez-Campos Mayoral E. & Langer A.A. (2019), Devil’s Advocate Tactic to Generate Rapport. Polygraph, 52 (5).Search in Google Scholar

37Peters R., White D., Cleeland C. & Scholey A. (2020), Fuel for Thought? A Systematic Review of Neuroimaging Studies into Glucose Enhancement of Cognitive Performance. Neuropsychology Review, 1–17.Search in Google Scholar

38Roach J. & Pease K. (2013), Police overestimation of criminal career homogeneity. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 11 (2), 164–178.Search in Google Scholar

39Roberts K.A. & Herrington V. (2019), Police interviews with suspects: international perspectives. In: Handbook of police psychology (pp. 438–455). Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

40Rossmo D.K. (ed.) (2009), Criminal Investigative Failures. Baton Rouge: CRC Press.Search in Google Scholar

41Schollum M. (2005), Investigative interviewing: The literature. Office of the Commissioner of Police, Wellington, New Zealand.Search in Google Scholar

42Shepherd E. (2008a), Investigative interviewing. Oxford University Press, USA.Search in Google Scholar

43Shepherd E. (2008b), SE3R: A resource book (4th ed.). East Hendred, UK: Forensic Solutions.Search in Google Scholar

44Shepherd E & Griffiths A. (2013), Investigative Interviewing: The Conversation Management Approach. OUP Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

45Snook B., Brooks D. & Bull R. (2015), A lesson on interrogations from detainees: predicting self-reported confessions and cooperation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42 (12), 1243–1260.Search in Google Scholar

46United Nations A/71/298 (2016), 70/146 Assembly resolution. Recovery from: http://antitorture.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Report_A-71-298_English.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

47van der Sleen J. (2009), A structured model of investigative interviewing of suspects. In: R. Bull, T. Valentine & T. Williamson (eds.), Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing: Current developments and future directions, pp. 35–52, Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

48Vrij A., Hope L. & Fisher R.P. (2014), Eliciting reliable information in investigative interviews. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1 (1), 129–136.Search in Google Scholar

49Walsh D. & Bull R. (2012), Examining rapport in investigative interviews with suspects: Does its building and maintenance work? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27 (1), 73–84.Search in Google Scholar

50Walsh D. & Bull R. (2015), Interviewing suspects: Examining the association between skills, questioning, evidence disclosure, and interview outcomes. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21 (7), 661–680.Search in Google Scholar

51Walsh D., King M. & Griffiths A. (2017), Evaluating interviews which search for the truth with suspects: but are investigators’ self-assessments of their own skills truthful ones? Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(7), 647–665.Search in Google Scholar

52Walters S.B. (2002), Principles of Kinesic Interview and Interrogation. CRC press.Search in Google Scholar