[
Bagstad, K.J., Johnson, G.W., Voigt, B. & Villa F. (2013). Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: a comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services. Ecosystem Services, 4, 117−125. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012.10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barral, M.P., Rey Benayas, J.M., Meli, P. & Maceira N.O. (2015). Quantifying the impacts of ecological restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems: A global meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 202, 223–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.009.10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, G., Montag, J.M. & Lyon K. (2011). Public participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services. Society and Natural Resources, 25(7), 633−651. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2011.621511.10.1080/08941920.2011.621511
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burkhard, B., Kandziora, M., Hou, Y. & Műller E. (2014). Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands – concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landscape Online, 34. DOI: 10.3097/LO.201434.10.3097/LO.201434
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S. & Műller F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand, and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bushell, R. & Eagles P.F. (Eds). (2007). Tourism and protected areas: benefits be yond boundaries: the 5th IUCN World Parks Congress. Oxfordshire: CABI. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/styles/publication/public/book_covers/BC-2007-027.jpg
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chan, K.M.A., Guerry, A.D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R., Halpern, B., Hannahs, B., Levine, J., Norton, B., Ruckelshaus, M., Russell, R., Tam, J. & Woodside U. (2012a). Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience, 62(8), 744−756. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7.10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chan, K.M.A., Satterfield, T. & Goldstein J. (2012b). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8−18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clemente, P., Calvache, M., Antunes, P., Santos, R., Cerdeira, J.O. & Martin M.J. (2019). Combining social media photographs and species distribution models to map cultural ecosystem services: The case of a Natural Park in Portugal. Ecological Indicators, 96(1), 59−68. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.043.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Daniel, T.C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J.W., Chan, K.M.A., Constanza, R., Elmquist, T., Flint, C.G., Gobster, P.H., Gret-Regamey, A., Lave, R., Muhar, S., Penker, M., Ribe, R.G., Schauppenlehner, T., Sikor T., Soloviy, I., Spierenburg., M., Taczanowska,K., Tam, J. & Von Der Dunk A. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. PNAS, 109(23), 8812–8819. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109.10.1073/pnas.1114773109338414222615401
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dobrovodská, M., Kanka, R., David, S., Kollár, J., Špulerová, J., Štefunková, D., Mojses, M., Petrovič, F., Krištín, A., Stašiov, S., Halada, Ľ. & Gajdoš P. (2019). Assessment of the biocultural value of traditional agricultural landscape on a plot-by-plot level: case studies from Slovakia. Biodivers. Conserv., 28(10), 2615−2645. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-019-01784-x.10.1007/s10531-019-01784-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dudley, N. & Stolton S. (2010). Arguments for protected areas: Multiple benefits for conservation and use. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781849774888
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eagles, P.F.J., Mccool, S.F. & Haynes CH.D.A. (2002). Sustainable tourism in protected areas: Guidelines for planning and management. Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN Gland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Google Maps (2019). https://www.google.sk/maps
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hanley, N., Wright, R.E. & Koop G. (2002). Modelling recreation demand using choice experiments: climbing in Scotland. Environmental and Resource Economics, 22(3), 449−466. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016077425039.10.1023/A:1016077425039
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hermes, J., Albert, CH. & Von Haaren Ch. (2018). Assessing the aesthetic quality of landscapes in Germany. Ecosystem Services, 31, 296−307. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.015.10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, J., Tichit, M., Poulot, M., Darly, S., Li, S., Petit, C. & Aubry C. (2015). Comparative review of multifunctionality and ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture. J. Environ. Manag., 149, 138–147. DOI: 10.1016/j. jenvman.2014.10.020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IUCN (2017). Protected areas. https://www.iucn.org/theme/protected-areas/about.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Izakovičová, Z., Špulerová, J. & Petrovič F. (2018). Integrated approach to sus-Špulerová, J. & Petrovič F. (2018). Integrated approach to sus-, J. & Petrovič F. (2018). Integrated approach to sustainable land use management. Environments MDPI, 5(3), 1−16. DOI: 10.3390/environments5030037.10.3390/environments5030037
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jančura, P. & Bohálová I. (2010). Methodology of identification and evaluation of the characteristic appearance of the landscape (in Slovak). Enviromaga zín, 15(6), 18−19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kemp, D.R. & Michalk D.L. (2007). Towards sustainable grassland and livestock management. J. Agric. Sci., 145(6), 543−564. DOI: 10.1017/ S0021859607007253.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koschke, L., Fürst, C., Frank, S. & Makeschin F. (2012). A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators, 21, 54−66. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kubinský, D., Weis, K., Fuska, J., Lehotský, M. & Petrovič F. (2015). Changes in retention characteristics of 9 historical artificial water reservoirs near Banská Štiavnica, Slovakia. Open Geosciences, 7(1), 880−887. DOI: 10.1515/ geo-2015-0056.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lieskovský, J., Rusňák, T., Klimantová, A., Izsóff, M. & Gašparovičová P. (2017). Appreciation of landscape aesthetic values in Slovakia assessed by social media photographs. Open Geosciences, 9(1). DOI: 10.1515/geo-2017-0044.10.1515/geo-2017-0044
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linnell, J.D.C., Kaczensky, P., Wotschikowsky, U., Lescureux, N. & Boitani L. (2015). Framing the relationship between people and nature in the context of European conservation. Conserv. Biol., 29(4), 978−985. DOI: 10.1111/ cobi.12534.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manning, R.E., Anderson, L.E. & Pettengill P. (2017). Managing outdoor recrea tion: Case studies in the national parks. CABI.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mapy CZ (2019). https://sk.mapy.cz/zakladni?x=19.0729779&y=49.2571053&z=9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mederly, P., Černecký, J., Špulerová, J., Izakovičová, Z., Jančovič, M., Ďuricová, V., Stašová, S., Hreško, J., Petrovič, F., Štefunková, D., Šatalová, B., Močko, M., Vrbičanová, G., Kaisová, D., Turanovičová, M., Kováč, T. & Laco I. (2019). Catalog of ecosystem services (in Slovak). Bratislava: State Nature Protection of the Slovak Republic, Nitra: Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Bratislava: Institute of Landscape Ecology SAS.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human well being: multiscale assessments. Washington: Island Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moyle, B.D., Scherrer, P., Weiler, B., Wilson, E., Caldicott, R. & Nielsen N. (2017). Assessing preferences of potential visitors for nature-based experiences in protected areas. Tourism Management, 62, 29–41. DOI: 10.1016/j. tourman.2017.03.010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muñoz, L., Hausner, V., Browm, G., Runge, C. & Fauchald P. (2019). Identifying spatial overlap in the values of locals, domestic - and international tourists to protected areas. Tourism Management, 71, 259−271. DOI: 10.1016/j. tourman.2018.07.015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OpenStreetMaps (2019). https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/49.2821/18.9112
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Othman, N., Mohamed, N. & Ariffin M.H. (2015). Landscape aesthetic values and visiting performance in natural outdoor environment. Proce dia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 202, 330−339. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.237.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.237
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palkechová, L. & Kozáková J. (2015). Ekonomika agroturistických prevádzok vo vybraných agrosubjektoch SR. Ekonomika Poľnohospodárstva, 15, 69−85.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palmer, C. (1999). Tourism and the symbols of identity. Tourism Management, 20(3), 313−321. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00120-4.10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00120-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petrovič, F. (2006). Changes of the landscape with dispersed settlement. Ekoló gia (Bratislava), 25(Suppl. 1), 201−211.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petrovič, F., Bugár, G. & Hreško J. (2009). List of landscape elements mapped in Slovakia (in Slovak). GeoInformation, 5, 112−124.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petrovič, F. & Muchová Z. (2013). The potential of the landscape with dispersed settlement (Case Study Čadca Town). In J. Fialová & H. Kubíčková (Eds.), Public Recreation and Landscape Protection With Man Hand in Hand? (pp. 199−204). Brno: Mendel University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petrovič, F. & Petrikovičová L. (2021). Landscape transformation of small rural settlements with dispersed type of settlement in Slovakia. European Coun tryside, 13(2), 455–478. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-019-01784-x.10.2478/euco-2021-0027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petrovič, F., Stránovský, P., Muchová, Z., Falťan, V., Skokanová, H., Havlíček, M., Gábor, M. & Špulerová J. (2017). Landscape-ecological optimization of hydric potential in foothills region with dispersed settlements - a case study of Nová Bošáca, Slovakia. Applied Ecology and Environmental Re search, 15(1), 379−400. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1501_379400.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plieninger, T, Dijks, S., Oteros-Rozas, E. & Bieling C. (2013). Assessing, mapping and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 33, 118−129. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013.10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schneider, J., Holušová, K., Buchtová, M., Konečný, O., Kozumplíková, A., Lacina, D., Lampartová, I., Lorencová, H., Miškolci, S., Redlichová, R., Venzlů, M. & Vyskot I. (2016). Ecosystem services and forest functions (in Czech). Brno: Mendelova Univerzita.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smiraglia, D., Ceccarelli, T., Bajocco, S., Perini, L. & Salvati L. (2015). Unraveling landscape complexity: Land use/land cover changes and landscape pattern dynamics (1954-2008) in contrasting peri-urban and agro-forest regions of Northern Italy. Environ. Manag., 56(4), 916−932. DOI: 10.1007/ s00267-015-0533-x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Špulerová, J., Petrovič, F., Mederly, P., Mojses, M. & Izakovičová Z. (2018). Contribution of traditional farming to ecosystem services provision: Case studies from Slovakia. Land, 7(2), 74. DOI: 10.3390/land7020074.10.3390/land7020074
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Štefunková, D., Špulerová, J., Dobrovodská, M., Mojses, M. & Petrovič F. (2013). Traditional agricultural Landscapes - A model of detailed land use mapping. Tájökológiai Lapok, 11(1), 1−21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torland, M., Weiler, B., Moyle, B.D. & Wolf I.D. (2015). Are your ducks in a row? External and internal stakeholder perceptions of the benefits of parks in New South Wales, Australia. Managing Sport and Leisure, 20(4), 211−237. DOI: 10.1080/23750472.2015.1028428.10.1080/23750472.2015.1028428
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vandewalle, M., Sykes, M.T., Harrison, P.A., Luck, G.W., Berry, P., Bugter, R., Dawson, T.P., Feld, C.K., Harrington, R., Haslett, J.R., Hering, D., Jones, K.B., Jongamn, R. & Lavorel S. (2009). Review paper on concepts of dy namic ecosystems and their services. The Rubicode Project Rationalising Biodiversity Conservation in Dynamic Ecosystems. http://www.rubicode.net/rubicode/RUBICODE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vološčuk, I. (2013). Theoretical principles of ecological processes, functions, and services of ecosystems (in Slovak). Banská Bystrica: Belianum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrbičanová, G., Kaisová, D., Močko, M., Petrovič, F. & Mederly P. (2020). Map- P. (2020). Map- Mapping cultural ecosystem services enables better informed nature protection and landscape management. Sustainability, 12(5), 2138. DOI: 10.3390/ su12052138.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ZBGIS (2019). https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa?bm=zbgis&z=14&c=19.024839,49.285714&sc=n#/meta/base-map/204
]Search in Google Scholar
