Tradition and Modernity in the Romanian Rural Space. Case Study: the Arges Sub-Carpathian Foothills

Alessandrescu, C., 1893. Dicţionarul geografic al judeţului Muscel. Bucharest: Socec.Search in Google Scholar

Bacanaru I., Candea M., 1977. ‘Aspecte geografice in alimentarea cu apa a localitatilor rurale si urbane din Romania’, SCGGG-Geogr.. Vol. XXIV, 2.Search in Google Scholar

Barbic A., 1988. ‘Cultural identity of the Slovenian countryside: Territorial integrity and Cultural diversity from the perspective of rural communities’, Agriculture and Human Values. Journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. Vol.15 nr. 3/1998: 253-265.10.1023/A:1007452715008Search in Google Scholar

Cocean, P., 2002. Geografie regional. Cluj Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană.Search in Google Scholar

Conea, I.,1931. ‘Aşezările omeneşti in depresiunea subcarpatică din Oltenia’, BSRRG, Vol. L.Search in Google Scholar

Courville, S ., 1993. ‘Tradition et modernite: leurs significations spatiales’ (Tradition and modernity: their spatial significance’), Recherches sociographiques, Vol. 34, no.2,: 211-231 (2 p.).10.7202/056768arSearch in Google Scholar

Cucu, V., 2009. Satul Romanesc. Tradiţie, contemporaneitate si speranţe de viitor. Bucuresti: Editura Transversal.Search in Google Scholar

Dejeant-Pons, M., 2007. Ghid de valorificare a patrimoniului rural. Casa de Presa si Editura TRIBUNA.Search in Google Scholar

Giddens, A.,1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press Search in Google Scholar

Ianoş, I., 1996. ‘The changing Romanian village. The case of Semlac in Arad county, Romania’, Geojournal. Vol. 38 (2).10.1007/BF00186666Search in Google Scholar

Majerova, V., 2009. ‘Local Initiatives Functioning as a C ondition of Rural Development of the Czech Countryside’, Eastern European Countryside. Vol. 15.: 127-149.10.2478/v10130-009-0008-2Search in Google Scholar

Manu, C. M., 2003. ‘Focul lui Sumedru’, Satul natal. Vol. III (9).Search in Google Scholar

Florea, M. S ., 1994. Les fetes chez les Roumains. Etude ethnographique. Bucaresti: Ed. F undaţiei Culturale Romane.Search in Google Scholar

Mlinar, Z., Uvod, M., Zdravko, Ur.,1995. Osamosvajanje in povezovanje vevropskem prostoru (Emancipation and Unification in the European Space). Ljubljana: Fakulteta za drubene vede, Znanstvena knjinica, pp.1-22.Search in Google Scholar

Tudor, P., 1997. Sărbătorile la romani. Studiu etnografic (Les fetes chez les Roumains. Etude ethnographique). Ediţie de: Datcu, Iordan. Bucureşti, Ed. S aeculum I. O ., pp.43.Search in Google Scholar

Panea, N., 1995. Antropologie a tradiţiilor: tradiţia populară şi mecanismele de reglare a mentalităţii (Anthropologie des traditions: la tradition populaire et les mecanismes de reglage des mentalites). Craiova, Ed. O mniscop, pp.137.Search in Google Scholar

Sandru, I., 1967. Problemele modernizarii satului romanesc, in Rev. „Terra”, nr.2Search in Google Scholar

Strassoldo, R., 1990. ‘Lokalna pripadnost in globalna Uvrstitev. Druboslovne razprave’ (‘Local belonging and global placing’). Ljubljana: Slovensko sociološko društvo in Inštitut za sociologijo, pp: 64-76.Search in Google Scholar

Urucu, V., 1985. ‘Centres ruraux de polarisation locale en Oltenie’, RRGGG, Geographie, pp.29.Search in Google Scholar

Urucu, V., Dobre, S., 1998. ‘Particularitati ale dezvoltarii durabile a satului din Campia Romana si din Dobrogea’, Comunicari de Geografie. Vol.II. Search in Google Scholar