À propos de cet article

Citez

RASopathies

(Other synonyms: Disorders related to the Ras/MAPK pathway, Noonan spectrum disorders, Noonan-like syndrome)

General information about the disease

Variants affecting the function of genes in the RAS–MAPK signal transduction pathway have been identified as responsible for RASopathies (1). The most common and studied RASopathies, Noonan syndrome (NS) and cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome (CFC), are characterized by multiple congenital anomalies (MCA). More than 50 types of congenital anomalies have been described in both syndromes (2). The cutaneous manifestations may include transient lymphedema of the dorsum of the hands and feet in infancy and stationary or progressive lymphangectatic edema in adulthood (3).

Prevalence of NS is about 1 in 1000 and 1 in 2500 live births (4, 5), whereas the prevalence for CFC is unknown.

The literature describes variable lymphatic abnormalities associated with NS and CFC. For example, a cross-sectional cohort study of 35 NS patients found a 49% prevalence of lymphedema, which was chronic and intermittent in nature and occurred at the extremities (6).

To date, 17 genes have been identified as associated with RASopathies: PTPN11, SOS1, RAF1, KRAS, HRAS, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, NRAS, CBL, SHOC2, BRAF, RIT1, A2ML1 (7), LZTR1, SOS2, SPRED1 and NF1. The disease arises from the hyperactivation of the RAS/MAPK pathway, which regulates cell proliferation, differentiation and migration (6). This hyperactivation is caused by gain-of-function mutations in genes like PTPN11 that activate the signalling in response to growth factors (8), or loss-of-function mutations in genes that negatively regulate this pathway, such as NF1 (9). Over half of NS cases are caused by mutations in PTPN11, which encodes SHP2, a tyrosine phosphatase (10). SOS1 gene mutations cause an additional 10 to 15%, and RAF1 and RIT1 genes each account for about 5% of cases (11). Mutations in other genes each account for a small number of cases. The molecular cause of NS in 15 to 20% of people with this disorder is unknown.

CFC is mainly caused by mutations in BRAF (~75%), followed by mutations in MAP2K1 or MAP2K2 (~25%), and KRAS (~1%) (11). Other genes are less frequently found mutated in CFC patients.

RASopathies are inherited in autosomal dominant pattern.

The following phenotypic variants might manifest with lymphatic malformations

Noonan syndrome 1 (NS1, OMIM disease 163950) - PTPN11 (OMIM gene 176876);

Noonan syndrome 3 (NS3, OMIM disease 609942) - KRAS (OMIM gene 190070);

Noonan syndrome 4 (NS4, OMIM disease 610733) - SOS1 (OMIM gene182530);

Noonan syndrome 6 (NS6, OMIM disease 613224) - NRAS (OMIM gene164790);

Noonan syndrome 8 (NS8, OMIM disease 615355) - RIT1 (OMIM gene 609591);

Noonan-like syndrome with or without juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (NSLL, OMIM disease 613563) - CBL (OMIM gene 165360);

Costello syndrome (CSTLO, OMIM disease 218040) - HRAS (OMIM gene 190020);

Noonan-like syndrome with loose anagen hair (NSLH1, OMIM disease 607721) - SHOC2 (OMIM gene 602775);

Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1 (CFC1, OMIM disease 115150) - BRAF (OMIM gene 164757);

Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 2 (CFC2, OMIM disease 615278) - KRAS (OMIM gene 190070);

Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 3 (CFC3, OMIM disease 615279) - MAP2K1 (OMIM gene 176872);

Patients with RASopathies may show lymphatic anomalies due to the fact that RAS/MAPK pathway is strictly linked to other pathways associated with the onset of syndromes with the predominant involvement of the lymphatic system (12).

Pathogenic variants may include missense, nonsense, splicing, small insertions and deletions, small indels, gross deletions and insertions, and complex rearrangements.

Aims of the test

To determine the gene defect responsible for the disease;

To confirm clinical diagnosis;

To assess the recurrence risk and perform genetic counselling for at-risk/affected individuals.

Test characteristics
Specialist centers/ Published Guidelines

The test is listed in the Orphanet database and is offered by 35 accredited medical genetic laboratories in the EU, and in the GTR database, offered by 21 accredited medical genetic laboratories in the US.

Guidelines for clinical use of the test are described in Genetics Home Reference (ghr.nlm.nih.gov) and Gene Reviews (11, 13).

Test strategy

Clinically distinguishable syndromes can be analyzed by sequencing only those genes known to be associated with that specific disease using Sanger or Next Generation Sequencing (NGS); if the results are negative, or more generally if clinical signs are ambiguous for diagnosis, a multi-gene NGS panel is used to detect nucleotide variations in coding exons and flanking introns of the above genes. Potentially causative variants and regions with low coverage are Sanger-sequenced. Sanger sequencing is also used for family segregation studies.

To perform molecular diagnosis, a single sample of biological material is normally sufficient. This may be 1 ml peripheral blood in a sterile tube with 0.5 ml K3EDTA or 1 ml saliva in a sterile tube with 0.5 ml ethanol 95%. Sampling rarely has to be repeated. Gene-disease associations and the interpretation of genetic variants are rapidly developing fields. It is therefore possible that the genes mentioned in this note may change as new scientific data is acquired. It is also possible that genetic variants today defined as of “unknown or uncertain significance” may acquire clinical importance.

Genetic test results
Positive

Identification of pathogenic variants in the above genes confirms the clinical diagnosis and is an indication for family studies.

A pathogenic variant is known to be causative for a given genetic disorder based on previous reports, or predicted to be causative based on loss of protein function or expected significant damage to proteins or protein/protein interactions. In this way it is possible to obtain a molecular diagnosis in new/other subjects, establish the risk of recurrence in family members and plan preventive and/or therapeutic measures.

Inconclusive

Detection of a variant of unknown or uncertain significance (VUS): a new variation without any evident pathogenic significance or a known variation with insufficient evidence (or with conflicting evidence) to indicate it is likely benign or likely pathogenic for a given genetic disorder. In these cases, it is advisable to extend testing to the patient’s relatives to assess variant segregation and clarify its contribution. In some cases, it could be necessary to perform further examinations/tests or to do a clinical reassessment of pathological signs.

Negative

The absence of variations in the genomic regions investigated does not exclude a clinical diagnosis but suggests the possibility of:

alterations that cannot be identified by sequencing, such as large rearrangements that cause loss (deletion) or gain (duplication) of extended gene fragments;

sequence variations in gene regions not investigated by this test, such as regulatory regions (5’ and 3’ UTR) and deep intronic regions;

variations in other genes not investigated by the present test.

Unexpected

Unexpected results may emerge from the test, for example information regarding consanguinity, absence of family correlation or other genetically based diseases.

Risk for progeny

In autosomal dominant transmission, the probability that an affected carrier transmit the variant to his/her children is 50% in any pregnancy, irrespective of the sex of the child conceived.

Limits of the test

The test is limited by current scientific knowledge regarding the gene and disease.

Analytical sensitivity (proportion of positive tests when the genotype is truly present) and specificity (proportion of negative tests when the genotype is not present)

NGS Analytical sensitivity >99.99%, with a minimum coverage of 10X; Analytical specificity 99.99%.

SANGER Analytical sensitivity >99.99%; Analytical specificity 99.99%.

Clinical sensitivity (proportion of positive tests if the disease is present) and clinical specificity (proportion of negative tests if the disease is not present)

Clinical sensitivity is estimated at about 80-85% (13).

Clinical specificity: data not available.

Prescription appropriateness

The genetic test is appropriate when:

the patient meets the diagnostic criteria for Noonan syndrome or a RASopathy;

the sensitivity of the test is greater than or equal to that of tests described in the literature.

Clinical utility
Clinical managementUtility
Confirmation of clinical diagnosisYes
Differential diagnosisYes
Couple risk assessmentYes
Availability of clinical trials can be checked on-line at htps://clinicaltrials.gov/
eISSN:
2564-615X
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Life Sciences, other, Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Physics, Nanotechnology, Biophysics