[BURLEIGH, M. (1994): Death and deliverance: Euthanasia in Germany 1900–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1080/03612759.1995.9949199]Search in Google Scholar
[COLLINS-NAIR, M., GREEN, R. S. & SUTIN, A. R. (2015): Abandoning the dead donor rule? A national survey of public views on death and organ donations. In: Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(4), pp. 297–302.10.1136/medethics-2014-102229]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, M. & KALAJTZIDIS, J. (2014): Ethics of social consequences and issue of the principle of humanity in medical ethics. In: 2nd Eurasian multidisciplinary forum. Tbilisi: ESI, pp. 235–243.]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, V. (1994): Angažovanosť, solidarita, zodpovednosť [Involvement, solidarity, responsibility]. Prešov: Universum.]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, V. (1997): Človek a morálka [Person and morality]. Brno: Doplněk.]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, V. (1999): Etika sociálnych dôsledkov v kontexte jej kritiky [Ethics of social consequences in the context of its critique]. Prešov: L.I.M.]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, V. (2008): Etika a reflexie morálky [Ethics and a reflection of morality]. Prešov: FF PU.]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, V. (2009): Dignity and human dignity as a methodological basis of bioethics. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): Bioethics in Central Europe: Methodology and education. Prešov: FF PU, pp. 73–86.]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, V. (2017): G. E. Moore and the theory of moral/right action in ethics of social consequences. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 7(1–2), pp. 57–65.10.1515/ebce-2017-0002]Search in Google Scholar
[GLUCHMAN, V. (2018): Introduction: Ethics of social consequences – the past and the present. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): Ethics of Social Consequences: Philosophical, Applied and Professional Challenges. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. viii–xxvii.]Search in Google Scholar
[HAKSAR, V. (1998): Moral Agents. In: E. Craig (ed.): Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 6. London: Routledge, pp. 499–504.]Search in Google Scholar
[KALAJTZIDIS, J. (2013): Ethics of social consequences as a contemporary consequentialist theory. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 3(3–4), pp. 159–171.]Search in Google Scholar
[KALAJTZIDIS, J. (2017): Mravný subjekt v etike sociálnych dôsledkov a jeho komparácia v kontexte konzekvencializmu [Moral agent in the ethics of social consequences and its comparison in the context of consequentialism]. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): Etické myslenie minulosti a súčasnosti (ETPP 2017/18): Človek v súčasnej etike [Ethical thinking – past and present (ETPP 2017/18): Person in contemporary ethics]. Prešov: FF PU, pp. 37–49.]Search in Google Scholar
[KALAJTZIDIS, J. (2018): Responsibility and Justice: Secondary Values in Ethics of Social Consequences. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): Ethics of social consequences: Philosophical, applied and professional challenges. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 2–23.]Search in Google Scholar
[KOMENSKÁ, K. (2014): Etika vzťahu k zvieratám (cez optiku etiky sociálnych dôsledkov) [Ethics of relation to animals (in the optics of the ethics of social consequences)]. Prešov: VPU.]Search in Google Scholar
[LUPER, S. (2009): The Philosophy of death. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627231]Search in Google Scholar
[MCMAHAN, J. (2002): The ethics of killing: Problems at the margins of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195079981.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[MYSONA BYRSKA, J. (2015): Values in consumption society: A comparison of consumption society in Poland and in Slovakia. In: European Scientific Journal, 11(special edition of July), pp. 110–117.]Search in Google Scholar
[POLOMSKÁ, J. (2018): Human dignity within ethics of social consequences. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): Ethics of social consequences: Philosophical, applied and professional challenges. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 137–183.]Search in Google Scholar
[SHEWMON, D. A. & MACHADO, C. (eds.) (2004): Brain death and disorders of consciousness. New York: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[SINGER, P. (2018): The challenge of brain death for the sanctity of life ethic. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 8(3–4), pp. 153–165.10.2478/ebce-2018-0012]Search in Google Scholar
[ŠVAŇA, L. (2016): On two modern hybrid forms of consequentialism. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 6(3–4), pp. 157–166.10.1515/ebce-2016-0014]Search in Google Scholar
[VEATCH, M. R. & ROSS, L. F. (2016): Defining death: The case for choice. Washington: Georgetown University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[VEATCH, M. R. (2010): Transplanting Hearts after Death Measured by Cardiac Criteria: The Challenge to the Dead Donor Rule. In: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 35(3), pp. 313–329.10.1093/jmp/jhq020]Search in Google Scholar