[
Cappelen, Herman and Dever, Josh [2019]. Bad Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chadha, Karamvir [2021]. “Conditional consent”. Law and Philosophy 40: 335–59.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davies, Alex. [2018]. “Testimonial knowledge and context-sensitivity: A new diagnosis of the threat”. Acta Analytica 34: 53–69.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodin, Robert. E. [2024]. “Consent as an act of commitment”. European Journal of Philosophy 32: 194–209.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guerrero, Alexander. [2021]. “The epistemology of consent”. In Applied Epistemology, ed. by J. Lackey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kleinig, John. [2010]. “The nature of consent”. In The Ethics of Consent: Theory and Practice, edited by F. G. Miller & A. Wertheimer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peet, Andrew. [2016]. “Testimony and the epistemic uncertainty of interpretation”. Philosophical Studies 173: 395–416.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pritchard, Duncan. [2007]. “Anti-luck epistemology”. Synthese 158: 277–97.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pritchard, Duncan. [2022]. “Varieties of epistemic risk”. Acta Analytica 37: 9–23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sosa, Ernest [1999]. “How to defeat opposition to Moore”. Philosophical Perspectives 13: 137–49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walker, Tom. [2012]. “Informed consent and the requirement to ensure understanding”. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29: 50–62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williamson, Timothy. [2000]. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
