<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>Correia and Rosenkranz (C&amp;R) defend their Growing Block theory of time by appealing to the importance of the notion of taking tense seriously. I argue that this phrase is ambiguous, having both a linguistic and a metaphysical interpretation, but neither interpretation will give C&amp;R what they need. On its linguistic interpretation it fails to have the metaphysical significance required to establish the truth of their theory. On its metaphysical interpretation it consists of nothing more than an assertion of their view, or at best, an acknowledgement of its merely possible truth. Finally, I consider C&amp;R’s response to the epistemic objection to their view, according to which, if the Growing Block theory is true, we cannot know that we are located at the objective present moment. The epistemic objection thus undermines the motivation for holding the Growing Block view in the first place. C&amp;R argue that the objection founders because it fails to take tense seriously enough. I argue that taking tense seriously cannot save their view from the epistemic objection.</p>
</abstract>

Correia and Rosenkranz (C&R) defend their Growing Block theory of time by appealing to the importance of the notion of taking tense seriously. I argue that this phrase is ambiguous, having both a linguistic and a metaphysical interpretation, but neither interpretation will give C&R what they need. On its linguistic interpretation it fails to have the metaphysical significance required to establish the truth of their theory. On its metaphysical interpretation it consists of nothing more than an assertion of their view, or at best, an acknowledgement of its merely possible truth. Finally, I consider C&R’s response to the epistemic objection to their view, according to which, if the Growing Block theory is true, we cannot know that we are located at the objective present moment. The epistemic objection thus undermines the motivation for holding the Growing Block view in the first place. C&R argue that the objection founders because it fails to take tense seriously enough. I argue that taking tense seriously cannot save their view from the epistemic objection.

Taking Tense Seriously Cannot Help the Growing Block

Disputatio

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"Taking Tense Seriously Cannot Help the Growing Block"}

Correia and Rosenkranz (C&R) defend their Growing Block theory of time by appealing to the importance of the notion of taking tense seriously. I argue that...

Taking Tense Seriously Cannot Help the Growing Block

Publié en ligne: 26 avr. 2023

Pages: 373 - 384

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2021-0020

Mots clés
epistemic objection, growing block theory, linguistic tense, metaphysical tense

© 2021 Heather Dyke, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Taking Tense Seriously Cannot Help the Growing Block

Publié en ligne: 26 avr. 2023

Pages: 373 - 384

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2021-0020

Mots clésepistemic objection, growing block theory, linguistic tense, metaphysical tense

© 2021 Heather Dyke, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Mots clés
epistemic objection, growing block theory, linguistic tense, metaphysical tense