<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In this paper I provide five separate responses, one for each of the contributed papers, in order to clarify some crucial aspects of the view defended in my book.</p></abstract>

In this paper I provide five separate responses, one for each of the contributed papers, in order to clarify some crucial aspects of the view defended in my book.

Replies

Disputatio

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"Replies"}

In this paper I provide five separate responses, one for each of the contributed papers, in order to clarify some crucial aspects of the view defended in my...

Replies

Publié en ligne: 29 janv. 2021

Pages: 309 - 329

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2020-0015

Mots clés
Co-reference, formalization, logical form, logical knowledge, validity

© 2020 Andrea Iacona, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Replies

Publié en ligne: 29 janv. 2021

Pages: 309 - 329

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2020-0015

Mots clésCo-reference, formalization, logical form, logical knowledge, validity

© 2020 Andrea Iacona, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Mots clés
Co-reference, formalization, logical form, logical knowledge, validity