Logic in Natural Language: Commitments and Constraints

Baumgartner, M. and Timm L. 2008. Adequate formalization. Synthese 164: 93–115.10.1007/s11229-007-9218-1Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 1998. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brun, G. 2008. Formalization and the objects of logic. Erkenntnis 69 (1): 1–30.10.1007/s10670-008-9112-3Search in Google Scholar

Brun, G. 2014. Reconstructing arguments. Formalization and reflective equilibrium. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 17: 94–129.10.30965/26664275-01701006Search in Google Scholar

Brun, G. 2017. Conceptual re-engineering: from explication to reflective equilibrium. Synthese, 1–30.Search in Google Scholar

Brun, G. 2018. Logical expressivism, logical theory and the critique of inferences. Synthese, 1–17.Search in Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1937. The Logical Syntax of Language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1962. Logical Foundations of Probability. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dutilh Novaes, C. 2012. Formal Languages in Logic: A Philosophical and Cognitive Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139108010Search in Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1967. Begriffsschrift. In From Frege to Gödel, edited by Jan van Heijenoort, 1–82. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goodman, N. 1983. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. 4th ed. Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Iacona, A. 2018. Logical Form. Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-74154-3Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, D. 1989. Demonstratives: an essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In Themes from Kaplan, 481–566. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Peregrin, J. and Svoboda, V. 2013. Criteria for logical formalization. Synthese 190(14): 2897–924.10.1007/s11229-012-0104-0Search in Google Scholar

Peregrin, J. and Svoboda, V. 2017. Reflective Equilibrium and the Principles of Logical Analysis: Understanding the Laws of Logic. Routledge.10.4324/9781315453934Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Resnik, M. D. 1985. Logic: normative or descriptive? The ethics of belief or a branch of psychology? Philosophy of Science 52(2): 221–38.10.1086/289241Search in Google Scholar

Sagi, G. 2013. Logical Consequence: Between Formal and Natural Language. PhD Thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Search in Google Scholar

Sagi, G. 2014. Formality in logic: from logical terms to semantic constraints. Logique et Analyse 227: 259–76.10.1017/CBO9781107280991.013Search in Google Scholar

Sainsbury, M. 1993. Logical Forms. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Steinberger, F. 2019. Three ways in which logic might be normative. Journal of Philosophy 116(1): 5–31.10.5840/jphil201911611Search in Google Scholar

Thagard, P. 1982. From the descriptive to the normative in psychology and logic. Philosophy of Science 49(1): 24–42.10.1086/289032Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by C. K. Ogden. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Woods, J. 2017. Characterizing invariance. Ergo 3: 778–807.10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.030Search in Google Scholar

Woods, J. and Michaelson, E. Building character. Manuscript.Search in Google Scholar