[Ahn, W., and Kim, N. S. 2000. The role of causal features in categorization: An overview. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 40, ed. by D. L. Medin. New York: Academic Press, 23-65.10.1016/S0079-7421(00)80017-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Bélanger, J., and Hall, D. G. 2006. Learning proper names and count nouns: Evidence from 16- and 20-month-olds. Journal of Cognition and Development 7, 45-72.10.1207/s15327647jcd0701_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Bermúdez, J. L. 2007. Thinking without words: An overview for animal ethics. The Journal of Ethics 11(3): 319-335.10.1007/s10892-007-9013-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Block, N. J. 1986. Advertisement for a semantics for psychology. In Midwest studies in philosophy, ed. by P. A. French. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 615-678.10.1111/j.1475-4975.1987.tb00558.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Braine, M. D. S., and O’Brien, D. P. (Eds.) 1998. Mental Logic. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carey, S. 1978. The child as word learner. In Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality, ed. by J. Bresnan, G. Miller and M. Halle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 264-293.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carey, S. 1982. Semantic development, state of the art. In Language Acquisition, State of the Art, ed. by L. Gleitman and E. Wanner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 347-389.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carey, S. 1985. Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carey, S. 2009. The Origin of Concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367638.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Crain, S. and Khlentzos, D. 2010. The logic instinct. Mind and Language 25(1): 30-65.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01380.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dehaene, S. 1997. The Number Sense. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dretske, F. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Emlen, S. T. 1975. The stellar-orientation system of a migratory bird. Scientiic American 233: 102-111.10.1038/scientificamerican0875-102]Search in Google Scholar
[Fodor, J. A. 1975. The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fodor, J. A. 1980. On the impossibility of acquiring “more powerful” structures: Fixation of belief and concept acquisition. In Language and Learning, ed. by M. Piatelli-Palmerini. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 142-162.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fodor, J. A. 1998. Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198236360.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Fodor , J. A. 2008. LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548774.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Fodor, J. A. 2010, October 8. Woof, woof [Review of the book The Origin of Concepts, by S. Carey]. Times Literary Supplement, 7-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., and Gibson, E. (in press). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Piraha language and cognition. Cognition 108: 819-824.10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallistel, C. R. 1990. The Organization of Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallistel, C. R., Brown, A., Carey, S., Gelman, R., and Keil, F. 1991. Lessons from animal learning for the study of cognitive development. In The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays in Biology and Cognition, ed. by S. Carey and R. Gelman. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 3-36.]Search in Google Scholar
[Garcia, J., Kimeldorf, D. J., and Koelling, R. A. 1955. Conditioned aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation. Science 122(3160): 157-8.10.1126/science.122.3160.157]Search in Google Scholar
[Gelman, R. and Gallistel, C. R. 1978. The Child’s Understanding of Number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gelman, S. A. 2003. The Essential Child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.003.0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Gordon, P. 2004. Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science 306(5695): 496-499.10.1126/science.1094492]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, D. G. and Waxman, S. R. 1993. Assumptions about word meaning: Individuation and basic-level kinds. Child Development 64: 1550-1570.10.2307/1131552]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hartnett, P., and Gelman, R. 1998. Early understandings of numbers: Paths or barriers to the construction of new understandings? Learning and Instruction 8(4): 341-374.10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00026-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Keil, F. C. 1989. Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keleman, D. and Carey, S. 2007. The essence of artifacts: Developing the design stance. In Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representation, ed. by E. Margolis and S. Lawrence. New York: Oxford University Press, 212-230.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kripke, S. 1972/1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9]Search in Google Scholar
[Leslie, A. M., Gallistel, C. R., and Gelman, R. 2007. Where integers come from. In The Innate Mind: Foundations and Future, ed. by P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, and S. Stich. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109-138.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0007]Search in Google Scholar
[Levin, B. and Pinker, S. 1991. Lexical and Conceptual Semantics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.1790651]Search in Google Scholar
[Livingstone, M. S, Srihasam, K., and Morocz, I. A. 2009. The benefit of symbols: monkeys show linear, human-like, accuracy when using symbols to represent scalar value. Animal Cognition 13: 711-719.10.1007/s10071-010-0321-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Macnamara, J. 1986. Border Dispute: The place of logic in psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Margolis, E. 1998. How to acquire a concept. Mind and Language 13: 347-369.10.1111/1468-0017.00081]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. 2011. Learning matters: The role of learning in concept acquisition. Mind and Language 26: 507-539.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01429.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Miller, G. A. 1977. Spontaneous Apprentices: Children and Language. Seabury Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, G. A. and Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1976. Language and Perception. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674421288]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Murphy, G. 2002. The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1602.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., and Povinelli, D. J. 2008. Darwin’s mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(2), 109-129.10.1017/S0140525X08003543]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pepperberg, I. and Carey, S. 2012. Grey Parrot number acquisition: The inference of cardinal value from ordinal position on the numeral list. Cognition 125: 219-232.10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Piantadosi, S. T., Tenenbaum, J. B., and Goodman, N. D. 2012. Bootstrapping in a language of thought: a formal model of numerical concept learning. Cognition 123: 199-217.10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Pica, P., Lemer, C., and Izard, V. 2004. Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science 306(5695): 499-503.10.1126/science.1102085]Search in Google Scholar
[Prasada S,. Ferenz K., and Haskell, T. 2002. Conceiving of entities as objectsand stuff. Cognition 83: 141-165.1186972210.1016/S0010-0277(01)00173-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Putnam, H. 1975. The meaning of meaning. In Language, Mind, and Knowledge, ed. by K. Gunderson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 131-193.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rey, G. 1983. Concepts and stereotypes. Cognition 15: 237-262.10.1016/0010-0277(83)90044-66686511]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rey, G. 2014. Innate and learned: Carey, mad dog nativism, and the poverty of stimuli and analogies (yet again). Mind and Language 29: 109-132.10.1111/mila.12044]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rips, L. J., Asmuth, J., and Bloomfield, A. 2013. Can statistical learning bootstrap the integers. Cognition 128: 320-330.10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Rips, L. J., Bloomfield, A., and Asmuth, J. 2008. From numerical concepts to concepts of number. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31: 623-642.10.1017/S0140525X08005566]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rips, L. J., and Hespos, S. J. 2011. Rebooting the bootstrap argument: Two puzzles for bootstrap theories of concept development. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34: 145-146.10.1017/S0140525X10002190]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., and Boyes-Braem, P. 1976. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8: 382-439.10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Shea, N. 2011. Acquiring a new concept is not explicable-by-content. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34: 148-150.10.1017/S0140525X10002219]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Smith, C., Carey, S., and Wiser, M. 1985. On differentiation: a case study of the development of size, weight, and density. Cognition 21(3): 177-237.10.1016/0010-0277(85)90025-33830547]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Smith, E., and Medin, D. 1981. Categories and Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674866270]Search in Google Scholar
[Spaepen, E., Coppola, M., Spelke. E, Carey, S., and Goldin-Meadow, S. 2011. Number without a language model. PNAS 108(8): 3163-8.10.1073/pnas.1015975108]Search in Google Scholar
[Strevens, M. 2000. The essentialist aspect of naïve theories. Cognition 74: 149-175.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00071-210617780]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Strevens, M. 2009. Theoretical terms without analytic truths. Philosophical Studies 143: 91-100.10.1007/s11098-008-9312-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiskopf, D. 2008. The origins of concepts. Philosophical Studies 140: 359-384.10.1007/s11098-007-9150-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiser, M. and Carey, S. 1983. When heat and temperature were one. In Mental Models, ed. by D. Gentner and A. Stevens. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 267-297.]Search in Google Scholar