<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>It is a classical argument against the objectivity of the flow of time that it would not be possible to make sense of its direction without stepping into a vicious circularity. This paper is dedicated to discuss some of the objections Tim Maudlin has recently put forward against this argument, while outlining an alternative and more effective way out of it.</p></abstract>

It is a classical argument against the objectivity of the flow of time that it would not be possible to make sense of its direction without stepping into a vicious circularity. This paper is dedicated to discuss some of the objections Tim Maudlin has recently put forward against this argument, while outlining an alternative and more effective way out of it.

Where Does Time Go?

Disputatio

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"Where Does Time Go?"}

It is a classical argument against the objectivity of the flow of time that it would not be possible to make sense of its direction without stepping into a...

Where Does Time Go?

Publié en ligne: 31 déc. 2018

Pages: 485 - 494

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2012-0013

Mots clés
Time, flow, direction, future, positive time axis

© 2012 Claudio Mazzola, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Where Does Time Go?

Publié en ligne: 31 déc. 2018

Pages: 485 - 494

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2012-0013

Mots clésTime, flow, direction, future, positive time axis

© 2012 Claudio Mazzola, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Mots clés
Time, flow, direction, future, positive time axis