[
Abdrasulov, E., Saktaganova, A., Saktaganova, I., Zhenissov, S., Toleuov, Z. (2023). Legal awareness and its significance when determining the nature of a person’s legal behaviour. International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, 15(6), 578–590.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Adanbekova, Z., Omarova, A. B., Yermukhametova, S., Assanova, S., Tynybekov, S. (2022). Features of an Electronic Transaction as Evidence in Court. Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicacoes, 14(1), 98–112.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amro, I. (2019). Online arbitration in theory and in practice. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aryn, A., Aidarbayev, S., Sharipova, A., Zhanibekov, A., Otarbayeva, A. (2021). International and interstate aspects of ensuring the rights of the suspect and the accused in the proceedings of forensic investigation. International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, 13(2), 155–179.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beisbekova, G. K., Konussova, V. T., Ismagulov, K. E., Saktaganova, I. S., Mukasheva, A. A. (2019). Problems of concretization of legal norms in Kazakhstan. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 10(1), 52–57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, H. K., Junker, K. W. (2021). Civil Procedure Brief Drafting Strategy. In US Law for Civil Lawyers (pp. 94–116). London: Bloomsbury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Civil Procedure Code of Republic of Armenia. (2018). Available at http://www.parliament.am/legislation.php?sel=show&ID=6196&lang=rus.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2015). Available at https://online.zakon.kz/document/?docid=34329053#sub id=0.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (1995). Available at https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K950001000.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Drapezo, V. Y., Drapezo, R. G., Gritskevich, T. I., Leukhova, M. G. (2022). Legal Support of Digital Business: Competencies and Tools Training Future Lawyers. In Proceeding of the International Science and Technology Conference “FarEastCon 2021”. Singapore: Springer, 885–892.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Engstrom, D. F., Gelbach, J. B. (2020). Legal tech, civil procedure, and the future of adversarialism. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 169, article number: 1001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fellmann, W. (2017). Anwaltsrecht. Bern: Anwaltsrecht.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freer, R. D. (2021). Civil procedure. Los Angeles: Aspen Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gordon, R. W. (2019). Lawyers, the legal profession & access to justice in the United States: A brief history. Daedalus, 103(3), 177–189.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hazelton, M. L. (2021). Judicial Impact and Factual Allegations: How the Supreme Court Changed Civil Procedure through the Plausibility Standard. Journal of Law and Courts, 1, 159–188.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Himonas, D. G., Hubbard, T. J. (2020). Democratizing the rule of law. Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 16(2), article number: 2620282.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. (1996). Available at https://www.un.org/ru/documents/declconv/conventions/pactpol.shtml.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kanaryk, Yu. (2023). Contractual obligations in Roman law: The genesis of the main forms. Law. Human. Environment, 14(2), 22–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konttinen, E. (2022). Lawyers In and Out of the Shadows of Political Liberalism. In The Limits of the Legal Complex: Nordic Lawyers and Political Liberalism. Oslo: University of Oslo, 190–200.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kullolli, B. (2023). Contract law of Albania in the context of public-private partnerships. Social and Legal Studios, 6(4), 105–113.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 176-VI “On Advocacy and Legal Assistance”. (2018). Available at https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?docid=33024087.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Legal Services Act. (2007). Available at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/29/contents.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, V. H. (1978). Law without lawyers: A comparative view of law in China and the United States. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lubet, S., Boals, E. I. (2020). Expert testimony: A guide for expert witnesses and the lawyers who examine them. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lupoi, M. (2022). Chancellors as civil lawyers – and the equitable notion of “fraud”. Trusts & Trustees, 5, 343–350.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mackaay, E. (2021). Law and economics for civil law systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mentukh, N., Shevchuk, O. (2023). Protection of information in electronic registers: Comparative and legal aspect. Law, Policy and Security, 1(1), 4–17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nusubalieva, E., Beishenova, A., Ashymbaeva, T., Sartbekova, N., Dogdurbek, N. (2023). Civic identity of youth as an important element of modern sociocultural transformation of society. Social and Legal Studios, 6(4), 145–154.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pico i Junoy, J., López, J. A. A. (2022). Private communication between lawyers as evidence in a judicial process: A comparative journey. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 26(1), 61–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rennig, C. (1997). Subjective procedural justice and civil procedure. In Procedural Justice. London: Routledge, 207–234.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schatz, P. (2020). Judicial Profile: Hon. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States. Available at https://www.fedbar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/GinsburgMay2010-pdf-3.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shariy, V. I. (2019). The effectiveness of local municipal authorities of Ukraine in the exercise of powers delegated by the government. Asia Life Sciences, 1, 159–167.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spytska, L. V. (2022). Analysis of the most unusual court decisions in the world practice in terms of the right to justice. Social and Legal Studios, 5(4), 39–45.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tatsyi, V., Getman, A., Ivanov, S., Karasiuk, V., Lugoviy, O., Sokolov, O. (2010). Semantic network of knowledge in science of law. In Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Automation, Control, and Information Technology – Information and Communication Technology (pp. 218–222). Novosibirsk: IASTED.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tymoshenko, V., Bondar, S., Ivanchuk, N. (2023). Human freedom in the legal dimension. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 13(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.56215/naia-chasopis/1.2023.09
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uliutina, O. (2023). Information and communication technologies legislation for self-government bodies. Law. Human. Environment, 14(4), 66–78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vilks, A., Kipane, A., Kudeikina, I., Palkova, K., Grasis, J. (2022). Criminological Aspects of Current Cyber Security. Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicacoes, 14(2), 94–108.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ware, L. (2022). Black Lawyers and Civil Rights: The NAACP’s Legal Campaign against Segregation. Journal of Law Policy, 67(1), 393–408.
]Search in Google Scholar
