[
Blazo, O. and Kovacikova, H. (2019). Rule of law assessment – case study of public procurement. European Journal of Transformation Studies, 7(2), 221–236.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Communist Party of China. (2012). Constitution of Communist Party of China (Adopted on Nov. 14, 2012). China.org.cn. Available at https://www.china.org.cn/china/18th_cpc_congress/2012-11/16/content 27138030.htm.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corruption in China. (2020). South China Morning Post. Available at https://www.scmp.com/topics/corruption-china.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dwyer, P. (2018). Beneficial Ownership and Safe Harbor Rule in China. China Briefing News. Available at https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-beneficial-ownership-safe-harbor-rule-tax-treaty-benefits/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fang, L., Lerner, J., Wu, C. and Zhang, Q. (2018). Corruption, government subsidies, and innovation: Evidence from China. Available at https://doi.org/10.3386/w25098.10.3386/w25098
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Findley, M. G. (2012). Global shell games: Testing money launderers’ and terrorist financiers’ access to shell companies. Griffith University Centre for Governance and Public Policy.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Formisani, R. (2016). Beneficial Ownership and Effective Transparency. In Siclari, D. (Eds.) The new anti-money laundering law: First perspectives on the 4th European Union directive (pp. 25–43). Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-29099-7_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Furnas, I. and Kicina, A. (2016). Transparency case study: Public procurement in the Slovak Republic. Sunlight Foundation. Available at https://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2013/08/12/case-study-public-procurement-in-the-slovak-republic/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gong, T. and Zhou, N. (2014). Corruption and marketization: Formal and informal rules in Chinese public procurement. Regulation & Governance, 9(1), 63–76. Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12054.10.1111/rego.12054
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Graycar, A. (2020). Corruption and public administration. In Graycar, A. (Eds.) Handbook on corruption, ethics and integrity in public administration (pp. 1–10). Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781789900910.00006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henry, J. S. (2012). The price of offshore revisited. Tax Justice Network. Available at https://www.taxjustice.net/cms/upload/pdf/Price of Offshore Revisited 120722.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kršjaková, Z. (2019). Sanction mechanism of the register of public sector partners in context of public procurement. Bratislava Law Review, 3(2), 18–33. Available at https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2019.3.2.143.10.46282/blr.2019.3.2.143
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kruger, D. (2012). Who is a beneficial owner? Business Tax and Company Law Quarterly, 3(1), 8–17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Labant, J. and Sipos, G. (2016). The register of beneficial ownership in Slovakia: Revolutionary transparency, questionable implementation, unsure benefits. Transparency International Slovensko. Available at https://transparency.sk/en/the-register-of-beneficial-ownership-in-slovakia-revolutionary-transparency-questionable-implementation-unsure-benefits/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lacko, P. (2018). Do akej miery zodpovedaju zapisy v registri partnerov verejneho sektora skutočnosti [To what extent do the entries in the register of public sector partners correspond to reality?]. Milniky prava v stredoeuropskom priestore, Comenius University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ledeneva, A. (2009). Corruption in Postcommunist societies in Europe: A re-examination. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 10(1), 69–86. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/15705850802700017.10.1080/15705850802700017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lehman, Xu and Lee. (2012). What is the definition of Beneficial Owner? Lehman, Lee & Xu LLP, Law Firm. Available at https://www.lehmanlaw.com/resource-centre/faqs/taxation/what-is-the-definition-of-beneficial-owner.html.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lovell, D. W. (2005). Corruption as a transitional phenomenon: Understanding endemic corruption in postcommunist states. In Haller, D. and Shore, C. (Eds.) Corruption: Anthropological perspectives (pp. 65–83). Pluto Press.10.2307/j.ctt18fs7ts.6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lukacka, P. and Petrek, F. (2019). Register partnerov verejneho sektora a suvisiace povinnosti uchadzacov vo verejnom obstaravani [Register of public sector partners and related obligations of tenderers in public procurement]. Acta Facultatis Iuridicae Universitatis Comenianae, 38(1), 50–66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mamojka, M. (2017). The conducting of business by the state – a selective comparison of fundamental theoretical and practical aspects. Notitiae iudiciales Academiae collegii aedilium in Bratislava, 3(2), 45–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mandl, U., Dierx, A. and Ilzkovitz, F. (2008). The effectiveness and efficiency of public spending. Economic papers 31. European Commission.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manion, M. (2016). Taking China’s anticorruption campaign seriously. Economic and Political Studies, 4(1), 3–18. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2016.1152094.10.1080/20954816.2016.1152094
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mihalik, S., Vincent, F., Zigo, D. (2019). Otázka korupcie z pohľadu trestného práva a kriminológie s dôrazom na proces verejného obstarávania v Slovenskej republike. [The issue of corruption from the point of view of criminal law and criminology with emphasis on the public procurement process in the Slovak Republic]. In PRO LEGAL: deň študentov práva a doktorandov (pp. 106–122). Matej Bel University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of Justice of Slovak Republic. (2016). Explanatory Memorandum to the RPSP Act.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neshkova, M. I. and Rosenbaum, A. (2015). Advancing good government through fighting corruption. In Perry, J. L. and Christensen, R. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Public Administration (3rd ed., pp. 97–118). John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Niu, M. and Lin, M. (2020). When the power of the purse meets the power of technology: A case study of Guangzhou people’s Congress in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 42(4), 274–289. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.18-21727.10.1080/23276665.2020.1821727
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nye, J. (2017). Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis. Political Corruption, 281–300. Available at https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315126647-26.10.4324/9781315126647-26
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Patakyova, M., Gramblickova, B., Mazur, J. and Dutkova, P. (2018). Specificities of Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation of Companies under the Challenges of Sustainability. Comenius University in Bratislava.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petit Press a.s. (2016). Slovakia is the second most corrupt country in Europe, a report shows. spectator.sme.sk. Available at https://spectator.sme.sk/c/20342765/slovakia-is-the-second-most-corrupt-country-in-europe-a-report-shows.html.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petrek, F. (2018). Register partnerov verejneho sektora a pripravovane legislativne zmeny [Register of public sector partners and forthcoming legislative changes]. Ars notaria, 22(2), 15–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sanborn, H. H., Engel, N. A., Magidenko, E., McLaughlin, T. and Millard, B. N. (2021). Corporate transparency act: Federal beneficial ownership disclosure requirements are coming. Schiff Hardin. Available at https://www.schiffhardin.com/insights/publications/2021/corporate-transparency-act-federal-beneficial-ownership-disclosure-requirements-are-coming.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scott, I. and Gong, T. (2015). Evidence-based policy-making for corruption prevention in Hong Kong: A bottom-up approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 37(2), 87–101. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2015.1041222.10.1080/23276665.2015.1041222
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sheng, J., Xu, C. and Cai, W. (2020). Implementing China’s new foreign investment law, part one: Reporting requirements. Pillsbury Law. Available at https://www.pillsbury-law.com/en/news-and-insights/china-new-foreign-investment-law-part-one-reporting-requirements.html.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sipos, G. (2017). How to make beneficial ownership register work: Lessons from the Slovak beneficial ownership register. Transparency International Slovakia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, R. G., Oberman, T. and Fuller, G. (2020). Corruption of public officials by organised crime: Understanding the risks, and exploring the solutions. In Graycar, A. (Eds.) Handbook on Corruption, Ethics and Integrity in Public Administration, 80–96.10.4337/9781789900910.00013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Jakarta Post. (2020, May 26). Corruption convictions nearly double in China over last year. Available at https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2020/05/26/corruption-convictions-nearly-double-in-china-over-last-year-.html.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Secretariat of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information. (2019). A Beneficial Ownership Implementation Toolkit. Available at https://www.oecd.org/tax/transparency/beneficial-ownership-toolkit.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tholtova, B. and Sipos, G. (2019). Schránkové firmy sa zľakli a sťahujú sa – na Slovensko [Shell companies in fear, moving their seat – To Slovakia]. Transparency International Slovakia. Available at https://transparency.sk/sk/schrankove-firmy-sa-zlakli-a-stahuju-sana-slovensko/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trading Economics. (2021). Slovakia government spending. Available at https://trading-economics.com/slovakia/government-spending.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Transparency International. (2016). China Beneficial Ownership Transparency. Transparency.org. Available at https://www.transparency.org/files/content/publication/2015 BOCountryReport China.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uslaner, E. M. (2015). The Consequences of Corruption. In Heywood, P. M., (Eds.) Routledge handbook of political corruption (pp. 199–212). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vann, R. J. (2012). Beneficial Ownership: What Does History (and Maybe Policy) Tell Us. Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 12/66. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2144038.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, P. and Zhang, X. (2013). Regulating the procurement of state enterprises in China: Current status and future policy considerations. Frontiers of Law in China, 8(1), 1–35.10.1007/s11463-005-0003-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, J., Quan, S. and Jiang, J. (2019). Corruption and private firms’ survival in transition economies: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 57, 101339.10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101339
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhu, J., Huang, H. and Zhang, D. (2017). “Big tigers, big data”: Learning social reactions to China’s Anticorruption campaign through online feedback. Public Administration Review, 79(4), 500–513. Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12866.10.1111/puar.12866
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zigo, D. (2020). Postavenie advokata ako opravnenej osoby podla zakona o registri part-nerov verejneho sektora [Status of advocates as authorized persons according to the Act on the Register of Public Sector Partners]. In Bratislava legal forum. Comenius University in Bratislava.
]Search in Google Scholar
