[Astrov, V., Havlik, P. and Pindyuk, O. (2012). Trade Integration in the CIS: Alternate Options, Economic Effects and Policy Implications for Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine, wiiw Research Report 381, Vienna: Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dabrowski, M. and Taran, S. (2012). The Free Trade Agreement between the EU and Ukraine: Conceptual Background, Economic Context and Potential Impact, CASE Network Studies and Analyses, No. 437.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dreyer, I. (2012). What economic benefit to expect from DCFTAs? Visegrad Group and Germany Policy Makers Seminar, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Prague, November.]Search in Google Scholar
[EBRD. (2012). Transition Report 2012. Integration Across Borders. Chapter 4. London.]Search in Google Scholar
[EDB Centre for Integration Studies. (2012). Ukraine and the Customs Union. Comprehensive Assessment of the Macroeconomic Effects of Various Forms of Deep Economic Integration of Ukraine and the Member States of the Customs Union and the Common Economic Space, St. Petersburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[EDB Centre for Integration Studies. (2013). Monitoring of Mutual Investments. EDB Centre for Integration Studies’ Report no. 15. September. EDB: St. Petersburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[EDB Centre for Integration Studies. (2013). The Customs Union and Neighbouring Countries: Mechanisms and Instruments of Mutually Beneficial Partnership. EDB Centre for Integration Studies’ Report no. 11. March. EDB: St. Petersburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[EDB Centre for Integration Studies. (2013). Economic and Technological Cooperation by Sectors SES and Ukraine. EDB Centre for Integration Studies’ Report no. 18. November.]Search in Google Scholar
[EDB: St. Petersburg. Emerson, M. (2005): EU-Russia - the Four Common Spaces and the Proliferation of the Fuzzy, CEPS Policy Brief, Brussels, May.]Search in Google Scholar
[Emerson, M. (2011a). Review of the review - of the European Neighbourhood Policy, CEPS European Neighbourhood Watch, 71, May.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2010).Taking stock of the EuropeanNeighbourhood Policy, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Brussels: European Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Economy. (2011). The EU’sNeighbouring Economies: Coping with newchallenges, Occasional papers 86, DG ECFIN, November.]Search in Google Scholar
[Francois, J., Manchin, M., Norberg, H., Pindyuk, O. and Tomberger, P. (2013). Reducing Trans-Atlantic Barriers to Trade and Investment, European Commission and CEPR.]Search in Google Scholar
[Füle, Š. (2013a). EU-Ukraine: In Yalta about progress towards signing the Association Agreement. 10th Yalta Annual Meeting, in Yalta, Ukraine, 20 September, Speech/13/727.]Search in Google Scholar
[Füle, Š. (2013b). EU-Ukraine: Dispelling the Myths About the Association Agreement. International Conference “The Way Ahead for the Eastern Partnership”, Kyiv, Ukraine, 11 October, Speech/13/808.]Search in Google Scholar
[Füle, Š. (2013c). Speech at the National Round Table on European integration Kyiv, Ukraine, 11 October, Speech/13/810.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gligorov, V., Holzner, M., Landesmann, M., Leitner, S., Pindyuk, O. and Vidovic, H. (2012). New Divide(s) in Europe? Current Analyses and Forecasts, wiiw Research Report 9, Vienna: Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grant, Ch. (2011). A New Neighbourhood Policy for the EU, Centre for European Reform Policy Brief, London: CERP.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grinberg, R., Havlik, P. and Havrylyshyn, O. (eds). (2008). Economic Restructuring and Integration in Eastern Europe. Experiences and Policy Implications, Baden Baden:Nomos.10.5771/9783845210049]Search in Google Scholar
[Havlik, P. (2003).EUEnlargement: Implications for Growth and Competitiveness’,Astudy commissioned by the Austrian Ministry for Economic Affairs and Labour. wiiw, Vienna, August.]Search in Google Scholar
[Havlik, P. (2008). Structural change and trade integration on EU-NIS borders’, In: R. Grinberg et al. (eds.). Economic Restructuring and Integration in Eastern Europe. Experiences and Policy Implications, Baden Baden: Nomos, 119-148.10.5771/9783845210049-119]Search in Google Scholar
[Havlik, P. (2010). European Energy Security in View of Russian Economic and Integration Prospects, wiiw Research Report 362,Vienna:Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.]Search in Google Scholar
[Havlik, P. (2013). The European Union and Eurasia: Challenges of Economic Integration. Presentation at the VIII. Eurasian Development Bank Conference on Deepening and Widening of Eurasian Integration. Moscow, November. http://www.eabr.org/general//upload/8ConferenceDOC/presentations/Havlik-1.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Havrylyshyn, O. (2008). Structural change in transition 1990-2005: A comparison of New Member States and selected NIS countries. In: R.Grinberg et al. (eds.). Economic Restructuring and Integration in Eastern Europe. Experiences and Policy Implications, Baden Baden: Nomos, 17-48.10.5771/9783845210049-17]Search in Google Scholar
[Hunya, G. (2008). FDI in the new EU borderland. In: R. Grinberg et al. (2008). Economic Restructuring and Integration in Eastern Europe. Experiences and Policy Implications, Baden Baden: Nomos, 73-94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting. (2011). Ukraine’s Trade Policy Choice: Pros and cons of different regional integration options, Kiev: IERPC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Institute of Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. (2011). Or_ntovna anal_tiqna oc_nka ekonom_qnih nasl_dk_v ukladenn_ ugodi pro zonu v_l~no = torg_vl_ z _S abo vhod_enn_ do Mitnogo so_zu Ros_ =, B_lorus_ ta Kazahstanu (Approximate analytical estimate of economic consequences of FTA with EU or joining the Customs Union of Russia, Kazakhstan, and Belarus), Kyiv, mimeo.]Search in Google Scholar
[Movchan, V. and Shportyuk, V. (2012). EU-Ukraine DCFTA: the Model for Eastern Partnership Regional Trade Cooperation. CASE Network Studies and Analyses, No. 445.10.2139/ssrn.2158664]Search in Google Scholar
[Richter, S. (2011). Revival of the Visegrad Countries’ Mutual Trade after their EU Accession: a Search for Explanation’ (with Neil Foster-McGregor, Gabor Hunya and Olga Pindyuk), wiiw Research Report, No. 372, Vienna, July.]Search in Google Scholar
[Samson, I. (2002). The Common European Economic Space Between Russia and the EU: An Institutional Anchor for Accelerating Russian Reform. Russian Economic Trends, 11(3).10.1111/1467-9426.00247]Search in Google Scholar
[Vinokurov, E. and Libman, A. (2012). Eurasia and Eurasian Integration: Beyond the Post- Soviet Borders. Eurasian Integration Yearbook 2012. EDB: St. Petersburg, pp. 80-96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vinokurov, E. and Libman, A. (2012). Eurasian integration: Challenges of transcontinental regionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9781137283351]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallace, H. (2009). The European Union and its neighbourhood: time for a rethink, ELIAMEP Thesis, 4, May.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wisniewski, P. D. (2013). It Is High Time to Start a ‘Real Partnership’. Carnegie Moscow Center, November. (http://carnegie.ru/2013/11/20).]Search in Google Scholar
[World Bank. (2013). Doing Business 2014: Doing Business in a More Transparent World.]Search in Google Scholar
[Washington. D.C.: World Bank. (http://www.doingbusiness.org). wiiw. (2013). Handbook of Statistics. Countries in Transition. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, Vienna, November.]Search in Google Scholar
[Youngs, R. and Pishchikova, K. (2013). Smart Geostrategy for the Eastern Partnership. Carnegie Europe, November. ]Search in Google Scholar
