[Aberdein, A. (1997). Persuasive definition. OSSA Conference Archive. 2.]Search in Google Scholar
[Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. Springer-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Amabile, T. (2019). The Art of (Creative) Thought: Graham Wallas on the Creative Process. In V.P. Glăveanu (Ed.), The Creativity Reader (pp. 15–32). Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Amabile, T. & Kramer, J. (2011). The Progress Principles. Harvard Business School Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 30(3), 183–187.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barak, M. & Doppelt, Y. (1999). Integrating the Cognitive Research Trust (CoRT) Programme for Creative Thinking into a Project-based Technology Curriculum. Research in Science & Technological Education, 17, 139–151.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barbot, B., Besancon, M., & Lubart, T. (2016). The generality-specificity of creativity: Exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 178–187.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bardes, C., Gillers, D., & Herman, A. (2001). Learning to look: Developing clinical observational skills at an art museum. Medical Education, 35, 1157–1161.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barron, F. & Harrington, D.M. (1981) Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476.]Search in Google Scholar
[Basadur, M., Pringle, P., Speranzini, G., & Bacot, M. (2000). Collaborative problem solving through creativity in problem definition: Expanding the pie. Creativity and Innovation Mangement, .(1), 54–76.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berkun, S. (2010). The myths of innovation. O’reilly media Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk. Econometrica, 22(1), 23–36.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bransford, J.D., Sherwood R.D., & Sturdevant, T. (1984). Teaching Thinking and Problem Solving. Learning Technology Center Technical Report, .(2), 2–37.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buhl, H. (1960). Creative Engineering Design. Iowa State University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bull, K., Montgomery, D., & Baloche, L. (1995). Teaching Creativity at the College Level: A Synthesis of Curricular Components Perceived as Important by Instructors. Creativity Research Journal, .(1), 83–89.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burnard, P., Craft, A., Cremin, T., Duffy, B., Hanson, R., Keene, J., Haynes, L., & Burns, D. (2006). Documenting ‘possibility thinking’: A journey of collaborative enquiry. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buzan, T. (1984). Use your brain. Book Club Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[Campbell, D.T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6), 380–400.]Search in Google Scholar
[Charyton, C., Snelbecker, G.E., Elliott, J.O., & Rahman, M.A. (2013). College students’ general creativity as a predictor of cognitive risk tolerance. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 23(2), 79–96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chase, C.I. (1985). Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. In J. V. Mitchell Jr. (Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1631–1632). Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clapham, M.M. (1998). Structure of figural forms A and B of the Torrance Tests of Creating Thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 275–283.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cobley, P. (2008). Communication: Definitions and Concepts. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Copeland, R. (1991). Rhetoric hermeneutics and translation in the middle ages. Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential Originality and Effectiveness: The Dynamic Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258–267.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cotter, K., Pretz, J., & Kaufman, J. (2016). Applicant extracurricular involvement predicts creativity better than traditional admissions factors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), 2–13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Corcuera, M. (2022). Octahedral Creativity Framework. Creativity. Theories—Research—Applications, .(2), 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2022-0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Corcuera, M. (2024). Re-encounter your creativity. In-genius Creative method applied. Amazon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Corcuera, M. & Benito, M. (2021). La actitud creativa y la capacidad creativa en la creatividad cotidiana: una satisfacción y un reto. [Doctoral dissertation, Universidad del Pais Vasco].]Search in Google Scholar
[Couger, J. D., Higgins, L.F., & McIntyre, S.C. (1993) (Un)Structured Creativity in Information Systems Organizations. MIS Quarterly, 17(4), 375–398.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cropley, A. (2006). In Praise of Convergent Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391–404.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cropley, D.H. & Patston, T. (2019). Supporting Creative Teaching and Learning in the Classroom: Myths, Models, and Measures. In C. Mullen (Ed.), Creativity Under Duress in Education? Resistive Theories, Practices, and Actions (pp. 267–288). Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Csikszentmilhalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row.]Search in Google Scholar
[Csikszentmihaly, M. & Sawyer, K. (1995) Creative Insight: The Social Dimension of a Solitary Moment. In R.J. Sternberg & J.E. Davidson, J.E. (Eds.), The Nature of Insight (pp. 329–63). MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davis, L., Hoisl, K., & Davis, J. (2014). Spanning the creative space between home and work: leisure time, hobbies and organizational creativity. DRUID Society Conference 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Bono, E. (2004). How to Have a Beautiful Mind. Vermilion.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Bono, E. (2008). Six Thinking Hats. Penguin Books Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. D.C. Heath & co. Boston, Mass.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dörner, D. & Funke, J. (2017). Complex Problem Solving: What It Is and What It Is Not. Front Psychol, ., 1–11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eglite, Z. (2023). Collaboration in creative industris—From creative industries and intermediaries to networks. Culture Crossroads, 23, 102–117. DOI: 10.55877/cc.vol23.397]Search in Google Scholar
[Elisondo, R. (2018). Serious leisure, self-perceptions and everyday creativity. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, .(1), 52–73.]Search in Google Scholar
[Erickson, B. & Kounios, J. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of Insight. The Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 71–93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, .(4), 290–309.]Search in Google Scholar
[Feldhusen, J., Speedie, S., & Treffinger, D. (1971). The Purdue creative thinking program. NSPI Journal, 10, 5–9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fink, A., Benedek, M., Grabner, R.H., Staudt, B., & Neubauer, A.C. (2007). Creativity meets neuroscience: experimental tasks for the neuroscientific study of creative thinking. Methods, 42, 68–76.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fontenot, N. (1993). Effects of training in creativity and creativity problem finding on business people. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 11–22.]Search in Google Scholar
[Franco, C. (2009). Efectos de un programa de meditación sobre los niveles de creatividad verbal sobre un grupo de alumnos/as de bachillerato. Suma Psicológica, 16(2), 113–120.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fürst, G., Ghisletta, P., & Lubart, T. (2012). The Creative Process in Visual Art: A Longitudinal Multivariate Study. Creativity Research Journal, 24(4), 283–295.]Search in Google Scholar
[Glăveanu, V.P. (2013). Rewriting the Language of Creativity: The Five A’s Framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gordon, W. (1961). Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity. Harper & Brothers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.]Search in Google Scholar
[Granovetter, M.S. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, ., 201–229.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grant, A. (2013). Rocking the boat but keeping it steady: The role of emotion regulation in employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1703–1723.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grant, A. & Schwartz, B. (2011). Too Much of a Good Thing: The Challenge and Opportunity of the Inverted U. Perspectives on Psychological Science, ., 61–76.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gruszka, A. & Tang, M. (2017). The 4P’s Creativity Model and its Application in Different Fields. In M. Tang & C.H. Werner (Eds.), Handbook of the Management of Creativity and Innovation: Theory and Practice (pp. 51–71). World Scientific Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guilford, J. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, ., 444–454.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guilford, J. (1957). A Revised Structure of Intellect. Studies of aptitudes of high-level personnel. University of Southern California.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gusti, V. & Rahayu, W. (2023). The influence of the Treffinger learning model and self-directed learning on students’ mathematic critical thinking skills. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, ., 49–62.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haase, J., Hanel, P., & Gronau, N. (2023). Creativity Enhancement Methods for Adults: A Meta-Analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts. DOI: 10.1037/aca0000557]Search in Google Scholar
[Heausler, N.L. & Thompson, B. (1988). Structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 463–468.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hegarty, C. (2009). The value and meaning of creative leisure. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, .(1), 10–13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Herman, A. (2016). Visual Intelligence. Sharpen your perception, change your life. Eamon Dolan/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.]Search in Google Scholar
[Howard, T., Culley, S.J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the Creative Design Process by the Integration of Engineering Design and Cognitive Psychology Literature. Design Studies, 29, 160–180.]Search in Google Scholar
[Isaksen, S.G., Dorval, K.B., & Treffinger, D. J. (1994). Creative approaches to problem solving. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co.]Search in Google Scholar
[Isen, A.M., Daubman, K.A., & Nowicki, G.P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131.]Search in Google Scholar
[Iyengar, S. & Lepper, M. (2001). When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? Journal of personality and social psychology, 79(6), 995–1006.]Search in Google Scholar
[Iyengar, S., Wells, R.E., & Schwartz, B. (2006). Doing Better but Feeling Worse: Looking for the “Best” Job Undermines Satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17(2), 143–150.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaarsveld , S., Lachmann, T., & van Leeuwen, C. (2012). Creative reasoning across developmental levels: convergence and divergence in problem creation. Intelligence, 40(10), 172–88.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jones, J.C. (1970). Design methods : seeds of human futures. Wiley-Interscience in association with the Council of Industrial Design.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kashdan, T.B., Stiksma, M.C., Disabato, D.J., McKnight, P.E., Bekier, J., Kaji, J., & Lazarus, R. (2018). The five-dimensional curiosity scale: Capturing the bandwidth of curiosity and identifying four unique subgroups of curious people. Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 130–149.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. (2020). Creative Behaviors Across Domains Scale. Unpublished manuscript.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. & Beghetto, R. (2009). Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. & Glăveanu, V.P. (2022). Positive Creativity in a Negative World. Education Sciences, 12(3), 193. Kelly, T. (2001). Prototyping is the shorthand of innovation. Design Management Journal, 12(3).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, K.H. (2006). Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 3-14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, K.H. (2017). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking—Figural or Verbal: Which One Should We Use? Creativity. Theories—Research—Applications, .(2), 302–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0015]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirton, M. (1989). Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of creativity and problem solving. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kotro, T. (2007). User Orientation Through Experience: A Study of Hobbyist Knowing in Product Development. Human Technology, .(2), 154–166.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. International Universities Press New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kryssanov, V.V., Tamaki, H., & Kitamura, S. (2001). Understanding design fundamentals: how synthesis and analysis drive creativity, resulting in emergence. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 15(4), 329–342.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lim, J., Phang, J., Low, M., & Tan, C. (2017). Procrastination is Detrimental to Undergraduate Students’ Self-Rated Creativity: The Mediating Role of State Anxiety. Creativity. Theories—Research—Applications, .(1), 99–115. DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2017-0005]Search in Google Scholar
[Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75–98.]Search in Google Scholar
[Long, H. (2014). An empirical review of research methodologies and methods in creativity studies (2003–2012). Creativity Research Journal, 26(4), 427–438.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lubart, T.I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 295–308.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lubart, T., Zenasni, F., & Barbot, B. (2013). Creative Potential and Its Measurement. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, .(2), 41–50.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lucas, B. & Nordgren, L. (2015). People Underestimate the Value of Persistence for Creative Performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 109, 232–243.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maslow, A.H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. Van Nostrand.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mayer, R. (2000). Intelligence and education. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 528). Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mehta, R. & Zhu, M. (2015). Creating When You Have Less: The Impact of Resource Scarcity on Product Use Creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 767–782.]Search in Google Scholar
[Melinat, P., Kreuzkam, T., & Stamer, D. (2014). Information overload: A systematicliterature revie. Proceedings of Conference Perspectives in Business Informatics Research, Lund, Schweden.]Search in Google Scholar
[Michalko, M. (2001). Cracking Creativity: The Secrets of Creative Genius. Ten Speed Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Montouri, A. (1992). Two books on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, ., 199–203.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moreau, C.P., & Dahl, D. (2005). Designing the Solution: The Impact of Constraints on Consumers’ Creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, ., 13–22.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mullainathan, S. & Shafir, E. (2014). Scarcity: The True Cost of Not Having Enough. Penguin Books Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Murata, A., Nakamura, T., & Karwowski, W. (2015). Influence of Cognitive Biases in Distorting Decision Making and Leading to Critical Unfavorable Incidents. Safety, ., 44–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nemeth, C. (1986). The Differential Contributions of Majority and Minority Influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23–32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oech, R. (1998). A Whack on the Side of the Head: How You Can Be More Creative. Warner books, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oliveira, E., Almeida, L., Ferrándiz, C., Ferrando, M., Sainz, M., & Prieto, M. (2009). Tests de pensamiento creativo de Torrance (TTCT): elementos para la validez de constructo en adolescentes portugueses. Psicothema, 21(4), 562–567.]Search in Google Scholar
[Osborn, A.F. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problemsolving. Scribner.]Search in Google Scholar
[Papazov, E. & Mihaylova, L. (2024). Operationalizing Business Strategy by Questioning. Valahian Journal of Economic Studies, 14, 39–48.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parnes, S. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. Scribner.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parnes, S. (1981). The Magic of Your Mind. Bearly Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parnes, S. (1988). Visionizing. D.O.K. Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parnes, S. (1992). Creative problem solving and visionizing. In S.J. Parners (Ed.), Sourcebook for creative problem solving (pp. 133–154). Creative Education Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peterson, C. & Seligman, M.E.P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press and American Psychological Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[Poincaré, H. (1908/1952). Mathematical creation. In B. Ghiselin (Ed.), The creative process: Reflections on invention in the arts and sciences (pp. 22–31). University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it. Doubleday Anchor Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Porto, M. & Romo, M. (2022). The Generative Force of the Domain and the Field: Contributions of Highly Creative Women. Creativity, Theories—Research—Applications, .(2), 119–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2022-0014]Search in Google Scholar
[Pressfield, S. (2002). The war of art. Rugged Land, LLC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pretz, J., Naples, A., & Sternberg, R. (2003). Recognizing, defining, and representing problems. The psychology of problem solving, 30(3), 3–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rački, Ž. (2017). Creativity as Educational Objectives: From a Meta-theoretical Heuristic to Domain-specific Creative Behaviours. Creativity. Theories—Research—Applications, .(2), 218–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0012]Search in Google Scholar
[Renzulli, J. (1986). New Directions in creativity. Creative Learning Pres, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 307–310.]Search in Google Scholar
[Root-Bernstein, R., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1995). Correlations between avocations, scientific style, work habits, and professional impact of scientists. Creativity Research Journal, .(2), 115–137.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rounds, J. (1995). Vocational interests: Evaluating structural hypotheses. In D. Lubinski & R.V. Dawis (Eds.), Assessing individual differences inhuman behavior (pp. 177–232). Davies-Black.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruff, J. (2002). Information overload: Causes, symptoms and solutions. A LILA briefing, Learning Innovations Laboratories, Harvard Graduate School of Education.]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. (2010). Divergent thinking, creativity, and ideation. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 413–446). Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M., Abdulla, A., Hyeon, S., & Al-Jasim, F. (2016). Which Test of Divergent Thinking Is Best? Creativity. Theories—Research—Applications, .(1), 4–18. DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2016-0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. & Jaeger, G. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Re-search Journal, 24, 92–96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryan, R. & Deci, E. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. The American psychologist, 55, 68–78.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sadler-Smith, E. (2015). Wallas’ Four-Stage Model of the Creative Process: More Than Meets the Eye? Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 342–352.]Search in Google Scholar
[Said Metwaly, S., Van den Noortgate, W., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Methodological Issues in Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review. Creativity. Theories—Research—Applications, .(2), 276–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0014]Search in Google Scholar
[Said Metwaly, S., Van den Noortgate, W., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Approaches to Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review. Creativity. Theories—Research—Applications, .(2), 238–275. DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2017-0013]Search in Google Scholar
[Sawyer, K. (2021). The iterative and improvisational nature of the creative process. Journal of Creativity, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2021.100002]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwartz, B. (2000). Self-Determination: The Tyranny of Freedom. The American psychologist, 55, 79–88.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwartz, B., Ben-Haim, Y., & Dacso, C. (2011). What makes a good decision? Robust satisficing as a normative standard of rational decision making. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(2), 209–227.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, G., Leritz, L., & Mumford, M. (2004). The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361–388.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shneiderman, B. (2000). Creating Creativity: User Interfaces for Supporting Innovation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, .(1), 114–138.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shin, J. & Grant, A.M. (2021). When putting work off pays off: The curvilinear relationship between procrastination and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 64(3), 772–798. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.1471]Search in Google Scholar
[Shroyer, K., Lovins, T., Turns, J., Cardella, M., & Atman, C. (2018). Timescales and ideaspace: An examination of idea generation in design practice. Design Studies, 57(4), 9–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2018.03.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Sikka, A. (1991). The effect of creativity training methods on the creative thinking of fourth, fifth, and sixth grade minority students. [Doctoral dissertation, Mississippi state University].]Search in Google Scholar
[Silvervarg, A., Haake, M., & Gulz, A. (2018). Perseverance Is Crucial for Learning. “OK! but Can I Take a Break?”. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, London, United Kingdom.]Search in Google Scholar
[Silvia, P.J., Martin, C., &, Nusbaum, E.C. (2009). A snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, ., 79–85.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon, H.A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Simonton, D.K. (1990). History, chemistry, psychology, and genius: An intellectual autobiography of historiometry. In M.A. Runco & R.S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 92–115). Sage Publications, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stebbins, R. (2015). Education for Self-Fulfillment: process and context. Educacao e Realidade, 41(3), 1–15. Stein, M.I. (1974). Stimulating creativity. Academic Press New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sternberg, R. (2006). The Nature of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sternberg, R. & Lubart, T. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677–688.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stoffregen, T.A. (2003). Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. Ecological Psychology, 15, 115–134.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tascón, M. (1921). Presentaciones de impacto. Larousse Editorial, S.L.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tormala, Z.L., Briñol, P., & Petty, R.E. (2006). When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 684–691.]Search in Google Scholar
[Torrance, E. (1966). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition-Verbal Tests, Forms A and B-Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Personnel Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Torrance, E. (1974). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition-Verbal Tests, Forms A and B-Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Personnel Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Torrance, E. (1995). Why fly? Ablex publishing corporation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Totuk, O. (2024). Enhancing the Outcome of Mechanical Engineering Design Course with the SCAMPER Methodology Framework. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 14, 76–83.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turcan, N. (2024). Affective Discernment as a Boundary Experience. Human Studies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-024-09739-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Broekhoven, K., Belfi, B., & van der Velden, R. (2020). Fostering University Students’ Idea Generation and Idea Evaluation Skills With a Cognitive-Based Creativity Training. Creativity. Theories—Research—Applications, .(2), 284–308.]Search in Google Scholar
[Voogt, J. & Roblin, N.P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. Jonathan Cape.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Y. & Ruhe, G. (2008). The Cognitive Process of Decision Making. Int’l Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, .(2), 73–85.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Patel, S., & Patel, D. (2006). A layered reference model of the brain (LRMB). IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 36, 124–133. DOI:10.1109/TSMCC.2006.871126]Search in Google Scholar
[Warren, T. & Davis, G. (1969). Techniques for creative thinking: An empirical comparison of three methods. Psychological Reports, 25, 207–214.]Search in Google Scholar
[Welling, H. (2007). Four Mental Operations in Creative Cognition: The Importance of Abstraction. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 163–177.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolfradt, U. & Pretz, J. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: personality, story writing and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 271–310.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zielińska, A. (2020). Mapping Adolescents’ Everyday Creativity. Creativity. Theories—Research—Applications, .(1), 208–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2020-0012]Search in Google Scholar
[Zeng, L., Proctor, R., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can Traditional Divergent Thinking Tests Be Trusted in Measuring and Predicting Real-World Creativity? Creativity research journal, 23(1), 24–37.]Search in Google Scholar
Profil Orcid