[
Ackerman, R., & Thompson, V.A. (2017). Meta-Reasoning: Monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 607–-617. doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.00410.1016/j.tics.2017.05.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beaty, R.E., & Silvia, P.J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 309–319. doi.org/10.1037/a002917110.1037/a0029171
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beghetto, R.A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Toward untangling creative self-beliefs. In M. Karwowski & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 4–19). Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00001-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berg, J.M. (2016). Balancing on the creative highwire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3), 433–468. doi.org/10.1177/000183921664221110.1177/0001839216642211
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corazza, G.E., (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258–267. doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.119562710.1080/10400419.2016.1195627
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dunning, D. (2003). Self-insight: Roadblocks and detours on the path to knowing thyself. Psychology Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 83–87. doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.0123510.1111/1467-8721.01235
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guo, Y., Lin, S., Acar, S., Jin, S., Xu, X., Feng, Y. and Zeng, Y. (2022), Divergent thinking and evaluative skill: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Creative Behavior. doi.org/10.1002/jocb.53910.1002/jocb.539
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iyengar, S.S., & Lepper, M. (2006). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? In S. Lichtenstein & P. Slovic (Eds.), The construction of preference (pp. 300–322). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618031.017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karwowski, M., Han, M.H., & Beghetto, R.A. (2019a). Toward dynamizing the measurement of creative confidence beliefs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13, 193–202. doi.org/10.1037/aca000022910.1037/aca0000229
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., & Beghetto, R.A. (2019b). Creative self-beliefs. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd Ed.). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316979839.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koriat, A. (2006). Are we frightened because we run away? Some evidence from metacognitive feelings. In B. Uttl, N. Ohta, & A.L. Siegenthaler (Eds.), Memory and emotion: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 83–103). Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756232.ch5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koriat, A. (2012). The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychological Review, 119, 80–113. doi: 10.1037/a002564810.1037/a0025648
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Medeiros, K.E., Steele, L.M., Watts, L.L., & Mumford, M.D. (2018). Timing is everything: Examining the role of constraints throughout the creative process. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(4), 471–488. doi.org/10.1037/aca000014810.1037/aca0000148
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mumford, M.D., & McIntosh, T. (2017). Creative thinking processes: The past and the future. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51, 317–322. doi.org/10.1002/jocb.19710.1002/jocb.197
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puente-Díaz, R., & Cavazos-Arroyo, J. (2020). Creative metacognitive feelings as a source of information for creative self-efficacy, creativity potential, intrapersonal idea selection, and task enjoyment. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54, 499–507. doi.org/10.1002/jocb.38410.1002/jocb.384
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puente-Díaz, R., & Cavazos-Arroyo, J. (2021). Creative personal identity and creative mindsets and their implications for creative potential and metacognition: A latent variable and a latent class approach. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 8, 20–31. doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2021-001510.2478/ctra-2021-0015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puente-Díaz, R., Cavazos-Arroyo, J., & Puerta-Sierra, L. (2021). Idea generation, selection, and evaluation: A metacognitive approach. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(4), 1015–1027. doi.org/10.1002/jocb.50510.1002/jocb.505
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puente-Díaz, R., Cavazos-Arroyo, J., & Vargas-Barrera, F. (2021). Metacognitive feelings as a source of information in the evaluation and selection of creative ideas. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100767. doi. org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.10076710.1016/j.tsc.2020.100767
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puente-Díaz, R., Cavazos-Arroyo, J., & Puerta-Sierra, L., & Vargas-Barrera, F. (2021). The contribution Openness to Experience and its two aspects to the explanation of idea generation, evaluation and selection: A metacognitive perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, 111240. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.11124010.1016/j.paid.2021.111240
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rietzschel, E.F., & Ritter, S. (2018). Moving from creativity to innovation. In R. Reiter-Palmon, V.L. Kennel, & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), Individual creativity in the workplace (pp. 3–34). Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-813238-8.00001-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M.A., & Smith, W.R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(3), 295–302. doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90105-X10.1016/0191-8869(92)90105-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sidi, Y., Torgovitsky, I., Soibelman, D., Miron-Spektor, E., & Ackerman, R. (2020). You may be more original than you think: Predictable biases in self-assessment of originality. Acta Psychologica, 203, 103002. doi. org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.10300210.1016/j.actpsy.2019.103002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silvia, P.J. (2008). Discernment and creativity: How well can people identify their most creative ideas? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 139–146. doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.3.13910.1037/1931-3896.2.3.139
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steele, L.M., Johnson, G., & Medeiros, K.E. (2018). Looking beyond the generation of creative ideas: Confidence in evaluating ideas predicts creative outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 21–29. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.02810.1016/j.paid.2017.12.028
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Terwiesch, C., & Ulrich, K.T. (2009). Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities. Harvard Business School Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Broekhoven, K., Belfi, B., Borghans, L., & Seegers, P. (2022). Creative idea forecasting: The effect of task exposure on idea evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 16(3), 519–528. doi. org/10.1037/aca000042610.1037/aca0000426
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Watts, L.L., McIntosh, T.J., Gibson, C., Mulhearn, T.J., Medeiros, K.E., Mecca, J.T., & Cohen-Charash, Y. (2020). Mild affective shifts and creativity: Effects on idea generation, evaluation, and implementation planning. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(4), 985–1001. doi.org/10.1002/jocb.42710.1002/jocb.427
]Search in Google Scholar
[
West, S.G., Taylor, A.B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). Guilford Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
