Accès libre

A Photograph as Material for Analysis and as a Creative Act. Visual Methods in Social Studies - Reflections and Dilemmas

À propos de cet article

Citez

Banks, M. (2013). Materiały wizualne w badaniach jakościowych. [Using Visual Data in Qualitative Research]. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Search in Google Scholar

Banks, M., Ruby, J. (2011). Made to be seen: Perspectives on the history of visual anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226036632.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bagnoli, A. (2009). Beyond the Standard Interview: The Use of Graphic Elicitation and Arts-Based Methods. Qualitative Research, 9(5), 547-570.10.1177/1468794109343625Search in Google Scholar

Baudrillard, J. (2012). Fotografia czyli świetlny zapis. [Photography, or the writing of light]. In: P. Sztompka, M. Bogunia-Borowska (Eds.), Fotospołeczeństwo. Analiza tekstów z socjologii wizualnej. [Photosociety. Analysis of texts from visual sociology] (pp.380-387), Kraków: Znak.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, H. S. (1974). Photography and Sociology. Visual Communication, 1 (1), 3-26.10.1525/var.1974.1.1.3Search in Google Scholar

Becker, H. S. (1980). Aesthetics, Aestheticians and Critics. Studies in the Anthropology. Visual Communication, 6, 58-68.10.1111/j.2326-8492.1980.tb00117.xSearch in Google Scholar

Becker, H. S. (1982). Culture: A Sociological View. Yale Review, 71, 513-28.Search in Google Scholar

Becker H. S. (1995). Backup of Visual Sociology, Documentary Photography, and Photo-journalism: It’s (Almost) All a Matter of Context. Visual Sociology 10(1-2): 5-14.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, H. S. (1998). Tricks of the trade. How to think about Your research while You are doing it. Chicago, London: The University of Chicacgo Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226040998.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1990). Structures, habitus, practices, in The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.Search in Google Scholar

Chomczyński, P. (2012). Teoria etykietowania. [Labeling theory]. In: K. Konecki, P. Chomczyński (Eds.) Słownik Socjologii Jakościowej [Qualitative Sociology Dictionary] (pp. 287-291), Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Difin.Search in Google Scholar

Cieślikowska-Ryczko A., & Dobińska, G., (2019). Using the Photographic Walk Technique in the Field Work of Probation Officers. Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych, [Educational Studies Review], 29, 209-235.10.12775/PBE.2019.024Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, A.E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781412985833Search in Google Scholar

Collier, J., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual Anthropology. Photography as a Research Method. Albuquerque: The University of New Mexico Press.Search in Google Scholar

Crilly, N., Clarkson, J., & Blackwell, A. (2006). Graphic Elicitation: Using Research Diagrams as Interview Stimuli. Qualitative Research, 6(3), 341-366.10.1177/1468794106065007Search in Google Scholar

Dymarczyk, W. (2008). Czy wielość może znaczyć jakość. O różnorodności socjologii wizualnej. [Can multiplicity mean quality? On the diversity of visual sociology]. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, [Qualitative Sociology Review], IV/3, 75-89.Search in Google Scholar

Emmison, M., Smith, P., & Mayall, M. (2012). Researching the visual. London: Sage.10.4135/9781473913899Search in Google Scholar

Ferrarotti, F. (1993). Culture and Photography: Reading Sociology through a Lens. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 7/1, 75-95.10.1007/BF02142348Search in Google Scholar

Ferenc, T. (2001). Socjologia obrazu, socjologia fotografii - praktyki badawcze. [Sociology of image, sociology of photography - research practices]. Przegląd Socjologiczny, [Sociological Review], 2, 1-25.Search in Google Scholar

Ferenc, T. (2010). O tym jak fotografia stworzyła współczesnego turystę. [About how photography created the modern tourist], 37-47. Warszawa: Narodowe Centrum Kultury.Search in Google Scholar

Ferenc, T., Dymarczyk, W., & Chomczyński, P. (2011). Socjologia wizualna w praktyce: Plakat jako narzędzie propagandy wojennej. [Visual sociology in practice: The poster as a tool of war propaganda]. Łódź: Wydawnictwo UŁ.Search in Google Scholar

Figueroa, S.K. (2008). The Grounded Theory and the Analysis of Audio-Visual Texts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(3), 1-12.10.1080/13645570701605897Search in Google Scholar

Frąckowiak, M. & Rogowski, Ł. (2009). W poszukiwaniu polskiej socjologii wizualnej. [In search for Polish visual sociology]. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, [Culture and Society], LIII(1), 123-152.10.35757/KiS.2009.53.1.7Search in Google Scholar

Frąckowiak, M. (2011). Obrazy w procesach negocjacji światów społecznych. [Images and negotation of the social worlds]. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, [Qualitative Sociology Review], 7(1), 42-56.10.18778/1733-8069.7.1.04Search in Google Scholar

Galman, S.A. (2009). The truthful messenger: visual methods and representation in qualitative research in education. Qualitative Research, 9(2), 197-217.10.1177/1468794108099321Search in Google Scholar

Garner, S. (2008). Writing on drawing: essays on drawing practice and research. Bristol: Intellect.Search in Google Scholar

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine: Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A.L. (2009). Odkrywanie teorii ugruntowanej. Strategie badania jakościowego. [Discovery of grounded theory]. Kraków: Nomos.Search in Google Scholar

Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity. Sociology Press, Mill Valley: CA.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1979). Gender Advertisments. New York: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (2006). Rytuały interakcyjne. [Interaction Ritual]. Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Harper, D. (1986). Meaning and Work: A Study in Photo Elicitation. Current Sociology, 34, 3, 24-46.10.1177/001139286034003006Search in Google Scholar

Harper, D. (1994). On the Authority of the Image. Visual Methods at the Crossroads. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 403-412). London, New Delhi: Thousand Oaks: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Holliday, R. (2000). We’ve been framed: visualising methodology. Sociological Review, 48(4), 503-521.10.1111/1467-954X.00230Search in Google Scholar

Jones, P., Bunce, G., Evans, J., Gibbs, M., & Hein, J.R. (2008). Exploring Space and Place With Walking In-terviews. Journal of Research Practice, 4(2), 1-9.Search in Google Scholar

Konecki, K., & Potomska, K. (2002). Archetypy w reklamie. [Archetypes in advertising]. Marketing i Rynek, [Journal of Marketing and Market Studies], 7, 1-15.Search in Google Scholar

Konecki, K. (2005). Wizualne wyobrażenia: główne strategie badawcze w socjologii wizualnej a metodologia teorii ugruntowanej. [Visual perceptions: major research strategies in visual sociology and the methodology of grounded theory]. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, [Qualitative Sociology Review], 1(1), 42-63.10.18778/1733-8069.1.1.04Search in Google Scholar

Konecki, K. (2012). Wizualna teoria ugruntowana. Podstawowe zasady i procedury. [Visual Grounded Theory. Basic rules and procedures]. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, [Qualitative Sociology Review], VIII(1), 13-45.Search in Google Scholar

Kunat, B. (2015). Pomiędzy sztuką a badaniem naukowym. Etnografia wizualna jako źródło wiedzy o rzeczywistości edukacyjnej. [Between art and scientific research. Visual ethnography as a source of knowledge about the educational reality]. Pogranicze. Studia Społeczne, [Borderland. social studies], XXVI, 89-101.Search in Google Scholar

Kusenbach, M (2003). Street Phenomenology. The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool. Ethnography, 4, 455-485.10.1177/146613810343007Search in Google Scholar

Magala, S. (2000). Szkoła widzenia czyli świat w subiektywie aparatu fotograficznego. [School of seeing or the world in the subject of a camera]. Wrocław: Biblioteka FormatuSearch in Google Scholar

Mannay, D. (2010). Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research, 10(1), 91-111.10.1177/1468794109348684Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, W.J.T. (1994). Picture theory. Essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, W.J.T. (2009). Zwrot piktorialny. [Pictorial Turn]. Kultura Popularna, [Popular culture], 1, 31-38.Search in Google Scholar

Niedźwiedź, A. (2012). Wizualność etnograficzna na podstawie materiałów z archiwum domowego profesora Romana Reinfussa. [Ethnographic Visuality in Materials from Professor Roman Reinfuss’s Private Archive]. Prace Etnograficzne, [Ethnographic Works], 40, 1-10.Search in Google Scholar

Niziołek, K. (2010). Między amatorstwem a etnografią. Fotografia jako narzędzie edukacji. [Between amateur and ethnography. Photography as an educational tool]. In: A. Młynarczuk & M. Sokołowski (Eds.), Uwiecznić Atlantydę. Wielokulturowość Podlasia w edukacji nieformalnej, [To capture Atlantis. Multiculturalism of Podlasie in informal education] (pp. 23-29). Białystok: Fundacja Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku UNIVERSITAS BIALOSTOCENSIS.Search in Google Scholar

Nóżka, M. & Martini, N. (2015). Metody mobilne i wizualne w praktyce badawczej: zastosowanie fotospaceru w socjologicznych badaniach map mentalnych i zachowań terytorialnych ludzi. [Mobile and Visual Methods in Research Practice. Using Photo-Walks in Sociological Research on Mental Maps and Human Territorial Behaviors]. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, [A review of qualitative sociology], 11(4), 34-50.10.18778/1733-8069.11.4.02Search in Google Scholar

O’Connor, P. (2007). ‘Doing boy/girl and global/local elements in 10-12 year olds drawings and written texts. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 229-247.10.1177/1468794107076022Search in Google Scholar

Olechnicki, K. (2003). Antropologia obrazu. Fotografia jako metoda, przedmiot i medium nauk społecznych. [Image anthropology. Photography as a method, object and medium of social sciences]. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, M. (2014). Participatory Biographies: Walking, Sensing, Belonging. In M. O’Neill, B. Roberts, & A. Sparkes (Eds.), Advancesin Biographical Research: Creative Applications (pp. 73-89). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Piejko, M. (2008). Skarby pamięci. Socjologiczna analiza fotografii rodzinnej. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 4(3), 4-50.10.18778/1733-8069.4.3.02Search in Google Scholar

Pink, S. (2007a). Doing Visual Ethnography. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage10.4135/9780857025029Search in Google Scholar

Pink, S. (2007b). Walking With Video. Visual Studies, 22(3), 240-252.10.1080/14725860701657142Search in Google Scholar

Pink, S., (2008). Mobilising Visual Ethnography: Making Routes, Making Place and Making Images. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), 1-17.Search in Google Scholar

Radley, A., Hodgetts, D., & Cullen, A. (2005). Visualizing homelessness: A study in photography and estrangement. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 15(4), 273-295.10.1002/casp.825Search in Google Scholar

Ripa, C. (1998). Ikonologia. [Iconology]. Kraków: Univesristas.Search in Google Scholar

Rose, G. (2001). Visual Methodologies. An Introduction to the lnteroretations of Visual Materials. London: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Rose, G. (2010). Interpretacja materiałów wizualnych. Krytyczna metodologia badań nad wizualnością. [An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials]. Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Rose, G. (2014). On the relation between ’visual research methods’ and contemporary visual culture. Sociological Review, 62(1), 24-46.10.1111/1467-954X.12109Search in Google Scholar

Schubert, C. (2006). Video Analysis of Practice and Practice of Video Analysis. Selecting field and focus in videography. In H. Knoblauch, B. Schnettler, J. Raab, & H. G., Soeffner (Eds.), Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods. Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology (pp. 115-127). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Sikora, S. (2003). Antropologia wizualna i film etnograficzny. [Visual Anthropology and Ethnographic film]. Warszawa: OPCIT, 3 (10)1, 8-9.Search in Google Scholar

Sikora, S. (2004). Fotografia między dokumentem a symbolem. [A photo between a document and a symbol]. Izabelin: Instytut Sztuki PAN.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, S. (2011). Visual Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Awakening Visions. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Strauss, A.L. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511557842Search in Google Scholar

Suchar, C. (1997). Grounding visual research in shooting scripts. Qualitative Sociology, 20(1), 33-55.10.1023/A:1024712230783Search in Google Scholar

Sztandara, M. (2003). O „etnograficzności” fotografii. [On the “ethnographic quality” of photography]. Konteksty. Polska Sztuka Ludowa. Antropologia kultury-etnografia-sztuka, [Contexts. Polish Folk Art. Cultural anthropology-ethnography-art], 3-4, 95-101.Search in Google Scholar

Sztompka, P. (2005). Socjologia wizualna. Fotografia jako metoda badawcza. [Visual sociology. Photography as a research method]. Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Thomson, R., & Holland, J. (2005). Thanks for the memory’: memory books as a methodological resource in biographical research. Qualitative Research, 5 (2), 201-219.10.1177/1468794105050835Search in Google Scholar

Trell, E.M., & Van Hoven B. (2010). Making Sense of Place: Exploring Creative and (Inter) active Research Methods with Young People. Fennia, 88, 91-104.Search in Google Scholar

Wall, K., Woolner, P., & Hall, E. (2012). Visual methodology: Previously, now and in the future. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 35(3), 223-226.10.1080/1743727X.2012.723923Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, J. (1979). Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills/London: SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Worth, S. (1981). Studying Visual Communication. Philadelphia: Pensylvania Press.10.9783/9781512809282Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2354-0036
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
2 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Arts, general, Social Sciences, Psychology, Development Psychology, Applied Psychology, Education, other