<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>When analysing centralised public procurement models and solutions from the public administration point of view, attention needs to be paid to the specific features of public procurement as well as the institutional characteristics of the major central procurement organisations. In this paper, central procurement organisations in 11 European countries were compared based on interviews according to their activities, market positions and institutional characteristics. We shall address the issue of efficiency and stability of organisational structures by comparing the practice of the Central and Eastern European (CEE) and non-CEE European Countries. This comparison analyses the differences of the countries’ centralised public procurement structures and reveals the diversity of analytic criteria, underlining that the legal regulatory background to public procurement is not necessarily predominant in determining specific features and characteristics. The stability and market-oriented characteristics of a centralised public procurement system have an impact on the innovativeness of central purchasing bodies (CPBs) and on the development of their service provider nature, which should be taken into account by the CEE countries with a less-developed public procurement culture.</p>
</abstract>

When analysing centralised public procurement models and solutions from the public administration point of view, attention needs to be paid to the specific features of public procurement as well as the institutional characteristics of the major central procurement organisations. In this paper, central procurement organisations in 11 European countries were compared based on interviews according to their activities, market positions and institutional characteristics. We shall address the issue of efficiency and stability of organisational structures by comparing the practice of the Central and Eastern European (CEE) and non-CEE European Countries. This comparison analyses the differences of the countries’ centralised public procurement structures and reveals the diversity of analytic criteria, underlining that the legal regulatory background to public procurement is not necessarily predominant in determining specific features and characteristics. The stability and market-oriented characteristics of a centralised public procurement system have an impact on the innovativeness of central purchasing bodies (CPBs) and on the development of their service provider nature, which should be taken into account by the CEE countries with a less-developed public procurement culture.

Comparative Analysis of the European Centralised Public Procurement

Central European Journal of Public Policy

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

{"article-title":"Comparative Analysis of the European Centralised Public Procurement"}

When analysing centralised public procurement models and solutions from the public administration point of view, attention needs to be paid to the specific...

Comparative Analysis of the European Centralised Public Procurement

Publié en ligne: 22 août 2023

Pages: 82 - 96

Reçu: 22 nov. 2022

Accepté: 03 févr. 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2023-0007

Mots clés
centralised procurement, innovative public procurement, central purchasing body, comparative analysis

© 2023 Tünde Tátrai et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Comparative Analysis of the European Centralised Public Procurement

Publié en ligne: 22 août 2023

Pages: 82 - 96

Reçu: 22 nov. 2022

Accepté: 03 févr. 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2023-0007

Mots cléscentralised procurement, innovative public procurement, central purchasing body, comparative analysis

© 2023 Tünde Tátrai et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Mots clés
centralised procurement, innovative public procurement, central purchasing body, comparative analysis