[
Campbell, D. E. and J. Kelly (2003) A strategy-proofness characterization of majority rule. Economic Theory, 22, 557-568.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Denicolo, V. (1985) Independent social choice correspondences are dictatorial. Economics Letters 19(1): 9-12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Geanakopolos, J. (2005) Three brief proofs of Arrow’s impossibility theorem. Economic Theory, 26, 211-215.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lahiri, S. (2019) State-Salient Decision Rules for Choice under Uncertainty. AIMS International Journal of Management, 13, 3, 191-195.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
May, K. O. (1952) A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decisions. Econometrica, 20, 680-684.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merlin, V. (2003) The Axiomatic Characterization of Majority Voting And Scoring Rules. Mathematiques et sciences humaines, 41e annee, 161, 87-109.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pattanaik, P. K. (1970) Sufficient Conditions for the Existence of a Choice Set under Majority Voting. Econometrica, 38, 1, 165-170.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ray, P. (1973) Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives. Econometrica, 41, 5, 987-991.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reny, Ph. J. (2001) Arrow’s Theorem and the Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem: a unified approach. Economics Letters, 70, 99-105.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salles, M. (2023) The possibility of generalized social choice functions and Nash’s independence of irrelevant alternatives. Social Choice and Welfare, 60, 299-311.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taylor, A. (2005) Social Choice and the Mathematics of Manipulation. Mathematical Association of America. Cambridge University Press, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wallis, W. D. (2014) The Mathematics of Elections and Voting. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
]Search in Google Scholar
Profil Orcid