Quality of Blended Learning Implementation in HEIs: Tool for Monitoring the Use of e-Learning Management Systems

1 Muthuraman, S., R. Veerasamy, T. C. Nabila. Blended Learning in Higher Education: A Critical Review. – The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, Vol. 8, 2020, No 1, 18. Search in Google Scholar

2 Agre, G., D. Dochev, L. Slavkova. Technology Enhanced Learning for Humanities by Active Learning − The SINUS Project Approach. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 12, 2012, No 4, pp. 25-42. Search in Google Scholar

3 Bashir, A., S. Bashir, K. Rana, P. Lambert, A. Vernallis. Post-COVID-19 Adaptations, the Shifts towards Online Learning, Hybrid Course Delivery, and the Implications for Biosciences Courses in the Higher Education Setting. – Front. Educ., Vol. 6, 2021, 711619. Search in Google Scholar

4 Weerathunga, P. R., W. H. M. S. Samarathunga, H. N. Rathnayake, S. B. Agampodi, M. Nurunnabi, M. M. S. C. Madhunimasha. The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Acceptance of e-Learning among University Students: The Role of Precipitating Events. – Education Sciences, Vol. 11, 2021, No 11, 436. Search in Google Scholar

5 Zeqiri, J., V. Kareva, S. Alija. The Impact of Blended Learning on Students’ Performance and Satisfaction in South East European University. – ENTRENOVA-ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, Vol. 6, 2020, No 1, pp. 233-244. Search in Google Scholar

6 Shkodrova, R., D. Dochev. Distance Learning through Mobile Devices – Some Problems and Applications. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 6, 2006, No 2, pp. 54-62. Search in Google Scholar

7 Graham, C. R. Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. – In: C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, Eds. Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, Publisher: Pfeiffer Publishing, 2006, pp. 3-21. Search in Google Scholar

8 Graham, C. R. Emerging Practice and Research in Blended Learning. – In: M. G. Moore, Ed. Handbook of Distance Education. 3rd Ed. New York, Routledge Publisher, 2013, pp. 333-350. Search in Google Scholar

9 Huang, Q. Learners’ Perceptions of Blended Learning and the Roles and Interaction of f2f and Online Learning. – ORTESOL Journal, Vol. 33, 2016, pp. 14-33. Search in Google Scholar

10 Heirdsfield, A., S. Walker, M. Tambyah, D. Beutel. Blackboard as an Online Learning Environment: What do Teacher Education Students and Staff Think? – Australian Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 37, 2011, No 7, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n7.4 Search in Google Scholar

11 Diep, A. N., C. Zhu, K. Struyven, Y. Blieck. Who or What Contributes to Student Satisfaction in Different Blended Learning Modalities? – British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 48, 2017, No 2, pp. 473-489. Search in Google Scholar

12 Zeqiri, J., V. Kareva, S. Alija. Blended Learning and Student Satisfaction: The Moderating Effect of Student Performance. Business Systems Research. – International Journal of the Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economics, Vol. 12, 2021, No 2, pp. 79-94. Search in Google Scholar

13 Bansal, P. Blended Learning in Indian Higher Education: Challenges and Strategies. – International Journal of Applied Research and Studies, Vol. 3, 2014, No 2, pp. 1-13. Search in Google Scholar

14 Batista-Toledo, S., D. Gavilan. Student Experience, Satisfaction and Commitment in Blended Learning: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. – Mathematics, Vol. 11, 2023, No 3, 749. Search in Google Scholar

15 Abou Naaj, M., M. Nachouki, A. Ankit. Evaluating Student Satisfaction with Blended Learning in a Gender-Segregated Environment. – Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, Vol. 11, 2012, No 1, pp. 185-200. Search in Google Scholar

16 Goncharov, V. V., D. I. Stepanova, D. V. Kovalev, T. A. Kovaleva, A. R. Batyrshina. Blended Learning Perspectives for Students (University Experience under Constraints due to the COVID-19 Pandemic). – Rev. Incl., Vol. 7, 2020, pp. 288-300. Search in Google Scholar

17 Siripongdee, K., P. Pimdee, S. Tuntiwongwanich. A Blended Learning Model with IoT-Based Technology: Effectively Used when the COVID-19 Pandemic? – J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci., Vol. 8, 2020, pp. 905-917. Search in Google Scholar

18 Prifti, R. Self-Efficacy and Student Satisfaction in the Context of Blended Learning Courses. – Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, Vol. 37, 2022, No 2, pp. 111-125. Search in Google Scholar

19 Broadbent, J. Comparing Online and Blended Learner’s Self-Regulated Learning Strategies and Academic Performance. – The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 33, 2017, pp. 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Leduc.2017.01.004 Search in Google Scholar

20 Chaiyama, N. The Development of a Blended Learning Management Model in Developing Information Literacy Skills (BL-ILS Model). – International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 5, 2014, No 7, pp. 483-489. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2015.v5.554 Search in Google Scholar

21 Okaz, A. A. Integrating Blended Learning in Higher Education. – In: Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 186, 2015, pp. 600-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.086 Search in Google Scholar

22 Zein, A. E., N. Hilal, B. Jibai, L. Attieh. Factors Influencing Students’ Satisfaction in Online Learning Amid the Challenging COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study for Lebanese Educational Sector. – Resmilitaris, Vol. 13, 2023, No 1, pp. 2923-2934. Search in Google Scholar

23 Al-Kahtani, N., A. Almurayh, A. V. Subbarayalu, T. Sebastian, H. Alkahtani, D. Aljabri. Sustaining Blended and Online Learning during Normal and New Normal Conditions in a Saudi Higher Education Institution: Health Science Students’ Perspectives. – Heliyon, Vol. 8, 2022, No 10, e10898. Search in Google Scholar

24 She, L., L. Ma, A. Jan, N. H. Sharif, P. Rahmatpour. Online Learning Satisfaction during COVID-19 Pandemic among Chinese University Students: The Serial Mediation Model. – Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12, 2021, 743936. Search in Google Scholar

25 Adedoyin, O. B., E. Soykan. Covid-19 Pandemic and Online Learning: The Challenges and Opportunities. – Interact. Learn. Environ. 2020, pp. 1-13. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180. Search in Google Scholar

26 Selvanathan, M., N. A. M. Hussin, N. A. N. Azazi. Students’ Learning Experiences during COVID-19: Work from Home Period in Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions. – Teaching Public Administration, Vol. 41, 2020, No 1, 0144739420977900. DOI: 10.1177/0144739420977900. Search in Google Scholar

27 Li, L. Students’ Academic Achievement and Satisfaction in a Blended Learning Community of College English in China: A Quasi-Experimental Study. – SAGE Open, Vol. 12, 2022, No 3, 21582440221119485. Search in Google Scholar

28 Giannousi, M., N. Vernadakis, V. Derri, M. Michalopoulos, E. Kioumourtzoglou. Students’ Satisfaction from Blended Learning Instruction. – In: Tcc. TCCHawaii, 2009, pp. 61-68. Search in Google Scholar

29 Wu, J., W. Liu. An Empirical Investigation of the Critical Factors Affecting Students’ Satisfaction in EFL Blended Learning. – Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 4, 2013, No 1, 176. Search in Google Scholar

30 Najafi, H., M. Heidari. Blended Learning and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. – Q. J. Iran. Dist. Educ., Vol. 2019, No 3, pp. 39-48. Search in Google Scholar

31 Grønlien, H. K., T. E. Christoffersen, M. Ringstad Andreassen, R. G. Lugo. A Blended Learning Teaching Strategy Strengthens the Nursing Students’ Performance and Self-Reported Learning Outcome Achievement in an Anatomy, Physiology, and Biochemistry Course – A Quasi-Experimental Study. – Nurse Education in Practice, Vol. 52, 2021, 103046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103046 Search in Google Scholar

32 Zhang, X., Z. Pi, C. Li, W. Hu. Intrinsic Motivation Enhances Online Group Creativity via Promoting Members’ Effort, Not Interaction. – British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 52, 2021, No 2, pp. 606-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13045 Search in Google Scholar

33 Ngo, J., A Ngadiman. Investigating Student Satisfaction in Remote Online Learning Settings During COVID-19 in Indonesia. – Journal of International and Comparative Education (JICE), 2021, pp. 73-95. Search in Google Scholar

34 Shantakumari, N., P. Sajith. Blended Learning: The Student Viewpoint. – Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, Vol. 5, 2015, No 5, pp. 323-328. Search in Google Scholar

35 Stein, J., C. R. Graham. Essentials for Blended Learning: A Standards-Based Guide. – Routledge, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

36 Abbas, Z. I. Blended Learning and Student Satisfaction: An Investigation into an EAP Writing Course. – Advances in Language and Literary Studies, Vol. 9, 2018, No 1, pp. 102-105. Search in Google Scholar

37 Buck, E., K. Tyrrell. Block and Blend: A Mixed Method Investigation into the Impact of a Pilot Block Teaching and Blended Learning Approach Upon Student Outcomes and Experience. – Journal of Furth. High. Educ., Vol. 46, 2022, pp. 1078-1091. Search in Google Scholar

38 Dien, T., N. Hai, N. Thainghe. Novel Approaches for Searching and Recommending Learning Resources. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 23, 2023, No 2, pp. 151-169. Search in Google Scholar

39 Fadde, P. J., P. H. Vu. Blended Online Learning: Benefits, Challenges, and Misconceptions. – In: P. R. Lowenthal, C. S. York, J. C. Richardson, Eds. Online Learning: Common Misconceptions, Benefits, and Challenges. Hauppauge, Nova Science Publishing, 2014, pp. 38-48. Search in Google Scholar

40 Romero-Frías, E., J. L. Arquero. A View on Personal Learning Environments through Approaches to Learning. – The International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, Vol. 1, 2013, No 1, pp. 29-36. Search in Google Scholar

41 Taghizadeh, M., F. Hajhosseini. Investigating a Blended Learning Environment: Contribution of Attitude, Interaction, and Quality of Teaching to Satisfaction of Graduate Students of TEFL. – The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, Vol. 30, 2021, No 5, pp. 459-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00531-z Search in Google Scholar

42 Mozelius, P., E. Hettiarachchi. Critical Factors for Implementing Blended Learning in Higher Education. – International Journal of Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Vol. 6, 2017, No 2, pp. 37-51. Search in Google Scholar

43 Nikou, S., I. Maslov. Finnish University Students’ Satisfaction with e-Learning Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic. – International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 37, 2023, No 1, pp. 1-21. Search in Google Scholar

44 Lubis, M., M. A. Hasibuan, R. Andreswari. Satisfaction Measurement in the Blended Learning System of the University: The Literacy Mediated-Discourses (LM-D) Framework. – Sustainability, Vol. 14, 2022, No 19, 12929. Search in Google Scholar

45 Habrusiev, V., H. Tereshchuk, I. Tsidylo, S. Martyniuk, O. Kulyanda. Monitoring the Quality of e-Learning Implementation in Educational Institutions, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

46 Ta’a, A., M. Bakar, S. Chit, M. Soid. Business Intelligence Model for Monitoring Blended Learning Usage. – Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), Vol. 9, 2017, No 3-5, pp. 27-30. Search in Google Scholar

47 Mershad, K., B. Said. DIAMOND: A Tool for Monitoring the Participation of Students in Online Lectures. – Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 27, 2022, No 4, pp. 4955-4985. Search in Google Scholar

48 Gaftandzhieva, S., R. Doneva, M. Bliznakov. A Comprehensive Approach for Monitoring Student Satisfaction in Blended Learning Courses. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 23, 2023, No 4, pp. 181-198. Search in Google Scholar