[1. U. G. C. Guidelines on Adaptation of the Choice Based Credit System. University Grants Commission Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, 110 002.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Hasan, M., M. Parvez. Choice-Based Credit System in India: Pros and Cons. – Journal of Education and Practice, Vol. 6, 2015, No 25, pp. 30-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. http://www.vit.ac.in/academics/ffcs]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Zafar, S., B. Manjurekar, N. P. Kumar, Z. A. Khan. Effects of FFCS (Fully Flexible Credit System) on Learning Experience and Academic Performance. – Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 143, 2014, pp. 4-7.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.347]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Xu, J., T. Xing, M. Van der Schaar. Personalized Course Sequence Recommendations. – IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 64, October 2016, No 20, pp. 5340-5352.10.1109/TSP.2016.2595495]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Paura, L., I. Arhipova. Student Dropout Rate in Engineering Education Study Program. – In: Proc. of 15th International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development, Jelgava, Latvia, May 2016, pp. 641-646.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Szafran, R. F. The Effect of Academic Load on Success for New College Students: Is Lighter Better? – Research in Higher Education, Vol. 42, 2001, No 1, pp. 27-50.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Kori, K., M. Pedaste, H. Altin, E. Tõnisson, T. Palts. Factors that Influence Students’ Motivation to Start and to Continue Studying Information Technology in Estonia. – IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 59, 2016, No 4, pp. 255-262.10.1109/TE.2016.2528889]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Mundfrom, D. J. Estimating Course Difficulty. Ph.D. Dissertation, Statistics, Iowa State Univ., Ames, USA, 1991.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Bassiri, D., E. M. Schulz. Constructing a Universal Scale of High School Course Difficulty. – Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol. 40, 2003, No 2, pp. 147-161.10.1111/j.1745-3984.2003.tb01101.x]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Banerjee, S., N. J. Rao, C. Ramanathan. Rubrics for Assessment Item Difficulty in Engineering Courses. – In: Proc. of Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), IEEE, 2015, pp. 1-8.10.1109/FIE.2015.7344299]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Kaur, K., K. Kaur. Analyzing the Effect of Difficulty Level of a Course on Students Performance Prediction Using Data Mining. – In: Proc. of 1st International Conference on Next Generation Computing Technologies (NGCT), IEEE, September 2015, pp. 756-761.10.1109/NGCT.2015.7375222]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Liu, J., S. Sha, Q. Zheng, L. Chen. Ranking Difficulty of Knowledge Units Based on Learning Dependency. – In: Proc. of 7th International Conference on e-Business Engineering, IEEE, November 2010, pp. 77-82.10.1109/ICEBE.2010.17]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Safavi, S. A., K. A. Bakar, R. A. Tarmizi, N. H. Alwi. What Do Higher Education Instructors Consider Useful Regarding Student Ratings of Instruction? Limitations and Recommendations. – Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 31, 2012, pp. 653-657.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.119]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Corelli, A. Direct Vs. Anonymous Feedback: Teacher Behavior in Higher Education, with Focus on Technology Advances. – Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 195, 2015, pp. 52-61.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.329]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Zainudin, S., K. Ahmad, N. M. Ali, N. F. A. Zainal. Determining Course Outcomes Achievement through Examination Difficulty Index Measurement. – Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 59, 2012, pp. 270-276.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.275]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Swart, A. J. Evaluation of Final Examination Papers in Engineering: A Case Study Using Bloom’s Taxonomy. – IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 53, 2010, No 2, pp. 257-264.10.1109/TE.2009.2014221]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Yang, F., F. W. Li, R. W. Lau. A Fine-Grained Outcome-Based Learning Path Model. – IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, Vol. 44, 2014, No 2, pp. 235-245.10.1109/TSMCC.2013.2263133]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Pumpuang, P., A. Srivihok, P. Praneetpolgrang, S. Numprasertchai. Using Bayesian Network for Planning Course Registration Model for Undergraduate Students. – In: Proc. of 2nd IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies, IEEE, February 2008, pp. 492-496.10.1109/DEST.2008.4635194]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Pumpuang, P., A. Srivihok, P. Praneetpolgrang. Comparisons of Classifier Algorithms: Bayesian Network, C4. 5, Decision Forest and NBTree for Course Registration Planning Model of Undergraduate Students. – In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE, October 2008, pp. 3647-3651.10.1109/ICSMC.2008.4811865]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Wang, X., F. Yuan. Course Recommendation by Improving BM25 to Identity Students’ Different Levels of Interests in Courses. – In: Proc. of 2009 International Conference on New Trends in Information and Service Science, IEEE, June 2009, pp. 1372-1377.10.1109/NISS.2009.104]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Garrido, A., L. Morales. e-Learning and Intelligent Planning: Improving Content Personalization. – IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, Vol. 9, 2014, No 1, pp. 1-7.10.1109/RITA.2014.2301886]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Parameswaran, A. G., H. Garcia-Molina, J. D. Ullman. Evaluating, Combining and Generalizing Recommendations with Prerequisites. – In: Proc. of 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ACM, October 2010, pp. 919-928.10.1145/1871437.1871555]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Parameswaran, A., P. Venetis, H. Garcia-Molina. Recommendation Systems with Complex Constraints: A Course Recommendation Perspective. – ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Vol. 29, 2011, No 4, Art. No 20.10.1145/2037661.2037665]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Betancur, L., B. M. Rottman, E. Votruba-Drzal, C. Schunn. Analytical Assessment of Course Sequencing: The Case of Methodological Courses in Psychology. – Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 111, 2019, No 1, pp. 91-103.10.1037/edu0000269]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Chen, C. M., C. Y. Liu, M. H. Chang. Personalized Curriculum Sequencing Utilizing Modified Item Response Theory for Web-Based Instruction. – Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 30, 2006, No 2, pp. 378-396.10.1016/j.eswa.2005.07.029]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Bridges, C., J. Jared, J. Weissmann, A. Montanez-Garay, J. Spencer, C. G. Brinton. Course Recommendation as Graphical Analysis. – In: Proc. of 52nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS), IEEE, March 2018, pp. 1-6.10.1109/CISS.2018.8362325]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Morrow, T., A. R. Hurson, S. S. Sarvestani. A Multi-Stage Approach to Personalized Course Selection and Scheduling. – In: Proc. of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI), San Diego, CA, 2017, pp. 253-262.10.1109/IRI.2017.58]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Cucuringu, M., C. Z. Marshak, D. Montag, P. Rombach. Rank Aggregation for Course Sequence Discovery. – In: Proc. of International Workshop on Complex Networks and Their Applications, Springer, Cham., November 2017, pp. 139-150.10.1007/978-3-319-72150-7_12]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Segal, A., Y. B. David, J. J. Williams, K. Gal, Y. Shalom. Combining Difficulty Ranking with Multi-Armed Bandits to Sequence Educational Content. – In: Proc. of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Springer, Cham., June 2018, pp. 317-321.10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_59]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Gunji, A. B., B. B. B. V. L. Deepak, C. R. Bahubalendruni, D. B. B. Biswal. An Optimal Robotic Assembly Sequence Planning by Assembly Subsets Detection Method Using Teaching Learning-Based Optimization Algorithm. – IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, Vol. 15, 2018, No 3, pp. 1369-1385.10.1109/TASE.2018.2791665]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Caprara, A., H. Kellerer, U. Pferschy. The Multiple Subset Sum Problem. – SIAM Journal on Optimization, Vol. 11, 2000, No 2, pp. 308-319.10.1137/S1052623498348481]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Caprara, A., H. Kellerer, U. Pferschy. A PTAS for the Multiple Subset Sum Problem with Different Knapsack Capacities. – Information Processing Letters, Vol. 73, 2000, No 3-4, pp. 111-118.10.1016/S0020-0190(00)00010-7]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Wisneski, J. E., G. Ozogul, B. A. Bichelmeyer. Investigating the Impact of Learning Environments on Undergraduate Students’ Academic Performance in a Prerequisite and Post-Requisite Course Sequence. – The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 32, 2017, pp. 1-10.10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.003]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Adjei, S. A., A. F. Botelho, N. T. Heffernan. Predicting Student Performance on Post-Requisite Skills Using Prerequisite Skill Data: An Alternative Method for Refining Prerequisite Skill Structures. – In: Proc. of 6th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, April 2016, ACM, pp. 469-473.10.1145/2883851.2883867]Search in Google Scholar