[1. Buchanan, J., L. Gardiner. A Comparison of Two Reference Point Methods in Multiple Objective Mathematical Programming. - European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 149, 2003, 17-34.10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00487-3]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Clímaco, J. C. N., M. E. Captivo, M. M. B. Pascoal. On the Bicriterion - Minimal Cost/Minimal Label - Spanning Tree Problem. - European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 204, 2010, No 2, 199-205.10.1016/j.ejor.2009.10.013]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Ehrgott, M., D. M. Ryan. Constructing Robust Crew Schedules with Bicriteria Optimization. - Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 11, 2002, No 3, 139-150.10.1002/mcda.321]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Ehrgott, M. A. Discussion of Scalarization Techniques for Multiple Objective Integer Programming. - Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 147, 2006, No 1, 343-360.10.1007/s10479-006-0074-z]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Genova, K., M. Vassileva. Reference-Neighbourhood Scalarization for Multiobjective Integer Linear Programming Problems, New Trends in Classification and Data Mining. - In: International Book Series “IS & C”. No 16. K. Markov, V. Ryazanov, V. Velychko, L. Aslanyan, Eds. 2010, 73-81.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Luque, M., K. Miettinen, P. Eskelinen, F. Ruiz. Incorporating Preference Information in Interactive Reference Point Methods for Multiobjective Optimization. - Omega, Vol. 37, 2009, No 2, 450-462.10.1016/j.omega.2007.06.001]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Luque, M., K. Miettinen, A. Ruiz, F. Ruiz. A Two-Slope Achievement Scalarizing Function for Interactive Multiobjective Optimization. - Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 39, 2012, 1673-1681.10.1016/j.cor.2011.10.002]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Costa, M. G., M., M. E. Captivo, J. C. N. Clímaco. Capacitated Single Allocation Hub Location Problem - A Bi-Criteria Approach. - Computers & OR, Vol. 35, 2008, No 11, 3671-3695.10.1016/j.cor.2007.04.005]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Miettinen, K. Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Miettinen, K., M. Makela. On Scalarizing Functions in Multiobjective Optimization. - OR Spectrum, Vol. 24, 2002, 193-213.10.1007/s00291-001-0092-9]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Miettinen, K., M. Makela, K. Kaario. Experiments with Classification-Based Scalarizing Functions in Interactive Multiobjective Optimization. - European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 175, 2006, 931-947.10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.019]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Ruiz, F, M. Luque, J. M. Cabello. A Classification of the Weighting Schemes in Reference Point Procedures for Multiobjective Programming. - Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 60, 2009, No 4, 544-553.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602577]Search in Google Scholar
[13. T’kindt, V., J.-Ch. Billaut. Multicriteria Scheduling. Theory, Models and Algorithms. Springer, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Wierzbicki, A. P. Reference Point Approaches. - In: T. Gal, et al., Eds. Multicriteria Decision Making: Advances in MCDM Models. Algorithms, Theory and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, 9-1 - 9-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Wolsey, L. Integer Programming. Wiley-Interscience, 1998.]Search in Google Scholar