[
1. K. Hughes, R. Vignjevic, J. Campbell, T. Vuyst, N. Djordjevic, and L. Papagiannis, From aerospace to offshore: Bridging the numerical simulation gaps–Simulation advancements for fluid-structure interaction problems, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 61, pp. 48–63, 2013.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.05.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. G. Hou, J. Wang, and A. Layton, Numerical Methods for Fluid-Structure Interaction - A Review, Communications in Computational Physics, vol. 12, pp. 337–377, 2012.10.4208/cicp.291210.290411s
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. H.-J. Bungartz and M. Schäfer, Fluid-Structure Interaction: Modelling, Simulation, Optimization. Springer, 2006.10.1007/3-540-34596-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. H.-J. Bungartz, M. Mehl, and M. Schäfer, Fluid-Structure Interaction II. Modelling, Simulation, Optimization. Springer, 2010.10.1007/978-3-642-14206-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. S. Piperno, C. Farhat, and B. Larrouturou, Partitioned procedures for the transient solution of coupled aeroelastic problems - Part I: Model problem, theory and two-dimensional application, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 124, pp. 79–112, 1995.10.1016/0045-7825(95)92707-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. M. Fernández, J. Gerbeau, and C. Grandmont, A projection semi-implicit scheme for the coupling of an elastic structure with an incompressible fluid, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 794–821, 2006.10.1002/nme.1792
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. A. Quaini and A. Quarteroni, A semi-implicit approach for fluid-structure interaction based on an algebraic fractional step method, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, vol. 17, no. 06, pp. 957–983, 2007.10.1142/S0218202507002170
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. S. Deparis, M. Discacciati, G. Fourestey, and A. Quarteroni, Fluid-structure algorithms based on Steklov-Poincaré operators, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineeering, vol. 195, no. 41-43, pp. 5797–5812, 2006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. K.-J. Bathe, H. Zhang, and S. Ji, Finite element analysis of fluid flows fully coupled with structural interactions, Computers & Structures, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 1 – 16, 1999.10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00042-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. M. Heil, An efficient solver for the fully coupled solution of large-displacement fluid–structure interaction problems, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 1 – 23, 2004.10.1016/j.cma.2003.09.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. S. Badia, A. Quaini, and A. Quarteroni, Modular vs. non-modular preconditioners for fluid–structure systems with large added-mass effect, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 197, no. 49, pp. 4216 – 4232, 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. P. Causin, J. Gerbeau, and F. Nobile, Added-mass effect in the design of partitioned algorithms for fluid-structure problems, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 194, no. 42-44, pp. 4506–4527, 2005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. J. Gerbeau and M. Vidrascu, A quasi-Newton algorithm based on a reduced model for fluid-structure interaction problems in blood flows, M2AN Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 631–648, 2003.10.1051/m2an:2003049
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. M. Fernández and M. Moubachir, A Newton method using exact Jacobians for solving fluid-structure coupling, Computers & Structures, vol. 83, no. 2-3, pp. 127–142, 2005.10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.04.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. S. Piperno, Explicit/Implicit fluid/structure staggered procedures with a structural predictor and fluid subcycling for 2D inviscid aeroelastic simulations, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 25, pp. 1207–1226, 1997.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. E. Burman and M. Fernández, Stabilized explicit coupling for fluid-structure interaction using Nitsche’s method, Comptes Rendus Mathematique, vol. 345, pp. 467–472, 2007.10.1016/j.crma.2007.09.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. M. Bukac, S. Canic, R. Glowinski, J. Tambaca, and A. Quaini, Fluid–structure interaction in blood flow capturing non-zero longitudinal structure displacement, Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 235, pp. 515 – 541, 2013.10.1016/j.jcp.2012.08.033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. J. Degroote and J. Bathe, K.-J.and Vierendeels, Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid–structure interaction, Computers & Structures, vol. 87, pp. 793–801, 2009.10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.11.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. J. Degroote and J. Vierendeels, Multi-solver algorithms for the partitioned simulation of fluid–structure interaction, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 200, pp. 2195–2210, 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. T. Richter, A monolithic geometric multigrid solver for fluid-structure interactions in ale formulation, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 104, pp. 372–390, 2015.10.1002/nme.4943
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. A. Slone, K. Pericleous, C. Bailey, M. Cross, and C. Bennett, A finite volume unstructured mesh approach to dynamic fluid-structure interaction: An assessment of the challenge of predicting the onset of flutter, Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 28, pp. 211–239, 2004.10.1016/S0307-904X(03)00142-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. P. Cardiff, A. Karac, P. D. Jaeger, H. Jasak, J. Nagy, A. Ivankovic, and Z. Tukovic, An open-source finite volume toolbox for solid mechanics and fluid-solid interaction simulations, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. H. G. Weller, G. Tabor, H. Jasak, and C. Fureby, A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques, Computers in physics, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 620–631, 1998.10.1063/1.168744
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. M. Breuer, G. De Nayer, M. Münsch, T. Gallinger, and R. Wüchner, Fluid-structure interaction using a partitioned semi-implicit predictor-corrector coupling scheme for the application of large-eddy simulation, Journal of Fluids and Structures, vol. 29, pp. 107–130, 2012.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2011.09.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. J. Revstedt, Interaction between an incompressible flow and elastic cantilevers of circular cross-section, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, vol. 43, pp. 244–250, 2013.10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2013.06.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. J. Lorentzon and J. Revstedt, A numerical study of partitioned FSI applied to a cantilever in incompressible turbulent flow, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 121, pp. 806–827, 2019.10.1002/nme.6245
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. L. Bertagna, A. Quaini, and A. Veneziani, Deconvolution-based nonlinear filtering for incompressible flows at moderately large Reynolds numbers, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 463–488, 2016.10.1002/fld.4192
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. M. Girfoglio, A. Quaini, and G. Rozza, A Finite Volume approximation of the Navier-Stokes equations with nonlinear filtering stabilization, Computers & Fluids, vol. 187, pp. 27–45, 2019.10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.05.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. K. Rege and B. Hjertager, Application of foam-extend on turbulent fluid-structure interaction, IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 276, p. 012031, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. B. Sekutkovski, I. Kostić, A. Simonovic, P. Cardiff, and V. Jazarević, Three-dimensional fluid–structure interaction simulation with a hybrid RANS-LES turbulence model for applications in transonic flow domain, Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 49, pp. 1–16, 2015.10.1016/j.ast.2015.11.028
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. J. Degroote, R. Haelterman, S. Annerel, P. Bruggeman, and J. Vierendeels, Performance of partitioned procedures in fluid-structure interaction, Computers & Structures, vol. 88, pp. 446–457, 2010.10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.12.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. F.-B. Tian, H. Dai, H. Luo, J. Doyle, and B. Rousseau, Fluid–structure interaction involving large deformations: 3D simulations and applications to biological systems, Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 258, pp. 451–469, 2014.10.1016/j.jcp.2013.10.047388407924415796
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. T. Richter, Goal-oriented error estimation for fluid-structure interaction problems, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 223-224, pp. 28–42, 2011.10.1016/j.cma.2012.02.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. L. Zhu, G.-W. He, S. Wang, L. Miller, X. Zhang, Q. You, and S. Fang, An immersed boundary method based on the lattice boltzmann approach in three dimensions, with application, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 61, pp. 3506–3518, 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. T. J. R. Hughes, W. K. Liu, and T. K. Zimmermann, Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 329–349, 1981.10.1016/0045-7825(81)90049-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. P. D. Thomas and C. K. Lombard, Geometric conservation law and its application to flow computations on moving grids, AIAA Journal, vol. 17, pp. 1030–1037, 1997.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. I. Demirdzić and M. Perić, Space conservation law in finite volume calculations of fluid flow, International Journal of Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 8, pp. 1037–1050, 1988.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. J. Borggaard, T. Iliescu, and J. Roop, A bounded artificial viscosity large eddy simulation model, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 47, pp. 622–645, 2009.10.1137/060656164
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. W. Layton, L. Rebholz, and C. Trenchea, Modular nonlinear filter stabilization of methods for higher Reynolds numbers flow, Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, vol. 14, pp. 325–354, 2012.10.1007/s00021-011-0072-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. J. Hunt, A. Wray, and P. Moin, Eddies stream and convergence zones in turbulent flows, Tech. Rep. CTR-S88, CTR report, 1988.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. A. Vreman, An eddy-viscosity subgrid-scale model for turbulent shear flow: Algebraic theory and applications, Physics of Fluids, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 3670–3681, 2004.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. A. L. Bowers, L. G. Rebholz, A. Takhirov, and C. Trenchea, Improved accuracy in regularization models of incompressible flow via adaptive nonlinear filtering, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 805–828, 2012.10.1002/fld.2732
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Z. Tukovic and H. Jasak, A moving mesh finite volume interface tracking method for surface tension dominated interfacial fluid flow, Computers & Fluids, vol. 55, pp. 70–84, 2012.10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.11.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. H. Jasak and Z. Tukovic, Automatic mesh motion for the unstructured finite volume method, Transactions of FAMENA, vol. 30, pp. 1–20, 2006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. A. Quarteroni, R. Sacco, and F. Saleri, Numerical Mathematics. Springer Verlag, 2007.10.1007/978-0-387-22750-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Z. Tukovic, A. Karac, P. Cardi, H. Jasak, and A. Ivankovic, OpenFOAM Finite Volume Solver for Fluid-Solid Interaction, Transactions of FAMENA, vol. 42, pp. 1–31, 2018.10.21278/TOF.42301
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. U. Küttler and W. Wall, Fixed-point fluid-structure interaction solvers with dynamic relaxation, Computational Mechanics, vol. 43, pp. 61–72, 2008.10.1007/s00466-008-0255-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Y. Bazilevs, V. Calo, J. Cottrell, T. Hughes, A. Reali, and G. Scovazzi, Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 173–201, 2007.10.1016/j.cma.2007.07.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. M. Girfoglio, A. Quaini, and G. Rozza, A POD-Galerkin reduced order model for a LES filtering approach, Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 436, p. 110260, 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. R. I. Issa, Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting, Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 40–65, 1986.10.1016/0021-9991(86)90099-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. S. V. Patankar and D. B. Spalding, A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1787–1806, 1972.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. J. P. Van Doormaal and G. D. Raithby, Enhancements of the simple method for predicting incompressible fluid flows, Numerical Heat Transfer, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 147–163, 1984.10.1080/01495728408961817
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. M. Luhar and H. Nepf, Flow-induced reconfiguration of buoyant and flexible aquatic vegetation, Limnology and Oceanography, vol. 56, pp. 2003–2017, 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. A. N. Kolmogorov, The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluids at very large Reynolds numbers, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, vol. 30, pp. 301–305, 1941.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. A. N. Kolmogorov, Dissipation of energy in isotropic turbulence, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, vol. 32, pp. 19–21, 1941.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. P. Lax and B. Wendroff, System of conservation laws, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 13, pp. 217–237, 1960.10.1002/cpa.3160130205
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. W. Meng, Analysis on dynamic response of a tension-leg platform riser system, Master’s thesis, Rice University, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
