Using Fuzzy TOPSIS and Balanced Scorecard for Kaizen Evaluation

1 Abbassinia, M., Kalatpour, O., Motamedzade, M., Soltanian, A., & Mohammadfam, I. (2020). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-TOPSIS framework for prioritizing emergency in a petrochemical industry. Archives of Trauma Research, 9(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.4103/atr.atr_85_19 Search in Google Scholar

2 Adams, M., Componation, P., Czarnecki, H., & Schroer, B. (1999). Lean manufacturing: How to start, support and sustain. SAE transactions, 1092-1097. https://doi.org/10.4271/1999-01-3362 Search in Google Scholar

3 Arif-Uz-Zaman, K. (2012). A fuzzy TOPSIS based multi criteria performance measurement model for lean supply chain (Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology). Search in Google Scholar

4 Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., & Goyal, S. K. (2010). A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. International journal of production economics, 126(2), 370-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.029 Search in Google Scholar

5 Bartel, P. (2011). Kaizen in outpatient services at Kishwaukee Community Hospital. Search in Google Scholar

6 Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various χ 2 approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 296-298. Search in Google Scholar

7 Bremser, W. G., & Barsky, N. P. (2004). Utilizing the balanced scorecard for R&D performance measurement. R and D Management, 34(3), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00335.x Search in Google Scholar

8 Chandrahas, V., Santosh, K. M., & Mahapatra, D. (2014). Use of Multicriteria Decision Making Method for the Selection of Optimum Maintenance Strategy. Journal of Material Science and Mechanical Engineering (JMSME), 1(2), 89–93. Search in Google Scholar

9 Dang, V. T., Wang, J., & Van-Thac Dang, W. (2019). An integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach to assess sustainable urban development in an emerging economy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(16), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162902 Search in Google Scholar

10 Doolen, T. L., Van Aken, E. M., Farris, J. A., Worley, J. M., & Huwe, J. (2008). Kaizen events and organizational performance: A field study. International journal of productivity and performance management, 57(8), 637–658. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400810916062 Search in Google Scholar

11 El Dardery, O. I. S., Gomaa, I., Rayan, A. R. M., Khayat, G. El., & Sabry, S. H. (2021). Sustainable balanced scorecard for Kaizen evaluation : Comparative study between Egypt and Japan. International journal of economics and management engineering, 15(10), 917–926. Search in Google Scholar

12 Farris, J. A., Van Aken, E. M., Doolen, T. L., & Worley, J. (2009). Critical success factors for human resource outcomes in Kaizen events: An empirical study. International journal of production economics, 117(1), 42-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.08.051 Search in Google Scholar

13 Ghicajanu, M. (2009). The Kaizen philosophy in Romania. Annals of the University of Petrosani : Economics, IX(1), 275–278. Search in Google Scholar

14 Glover, W. J., Van Aken, E. M., Farris, J. A., Doolen, T. L., & Worley, J. M. (2008). Kaizen event follow-up mechanisms and goal sustainability: preliminary results. In IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings (p. 1154). Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE). Search in Google Scholar

15 Gonzalez-Aleu, F., Van Aken, E. M., Cross, J., & Glover, W. J. (2018). Continuous improvement project within Kaizen: critical success factors in hospitals. TQM Journal, 30(4), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2017-0175 Search in Google Scholar

16 Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Jafarian, A. (2013). A fuzzy multicriteria approach for measuring the sustainability performance of a supplier based on a triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014 Search in Google Scholar

17 GRIPS Development Forum. (2009). Introducing KAIZEN in Africa. In Introducing kaizen in Africa (Issue October, pp. 1–11). GRIPS Development Forum. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781849735575-00001 Search in Google Scholar

18 Hájek, P., Stříteská, M., & Prokop, V. (2018). Integrating balanced scorecard and fuzzy TOPSIS for innovation performance evaluation. PACIS 2018 proceedings. Search in Google Scholar

19 Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag: New York. Search in Google Scholar

20 Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: The key to Japan’s competitive success. Search in Google Scholar

21 Imai, M. (1997). Gemba Kaizen: A commonsense low-cost approach to management. McGraw-Hill Professional. Search in Google Scholar

22 Ishijima, H., Nishikido, K., Teshima, M., Nishikawa, S., & Gawad, E. A. (2019). Introducing the “5S-KAIZEN-TQM” approach into public hospitals in Egypt. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 33(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2018-0143 Search in Google Scholar

23 Jassem, S., Zakaria, Z., & Che Azmi, A. (2021). Sustainability balanced scorecard architecture and environmental performance outcomes: a systematic review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2019-0582 Search in Google Scholar

24 Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrica, 39, 31-36. Search in Google Scholar

25 Kalender, Z. T., & Vayvay, Ö. (2016). The fifth pillar of the balanced scorecard: Sustainability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.027 Search in Google Scholar

26 Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review. Search in Google Scholar

27 Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1993). Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business Review. Search in Google Scholar

28 Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (2001). The strategy-focused organization. Harvard Business School Press. Search in Google Scholar

29 Ker, J. I., & Wang, Y. (2015). Kaizen Policies in Healthcare Governance: Reducing Patient-Flow Delays in Outpatient Surgery Setting through Healthcare Information Technology. Available at SSRN 2624133. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2624133 Search in Google Scholar

30 Kore, N. B., Ravi, K., & Patil, S. B. (2017). A simplified description of fuzzy TOPSIS method for multi criteria decision making. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 4(5), 2047-2050. Search in Google Scholar

31 Kumar, P., & Pandey, V. (2013). KAIZEN: A Case study in small scale organizations. International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering & Technology (IJSRET) Volume, 2, 133-136. Search in Google Scholar

32 Kumar, S., Dhingra, A., & Singh, B. (2018). Lean-Kaizen implementation: A roadmap for identifying continuous improvement opportunities in Indian small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Engineering, Design, and Technology, 16(1), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-08-2017-0083 Search in Google Scholar

33 Liu, L., Ratnatunga, J., & Yao, L. J. (2014). Firm characteristics and balanced scorecard usage in Singaporean manufacturing firms. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 22(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-05-2013-0038 Search in Google Scholar

34 Liu, W. H., & Farris, J. A. (2008). Evaluating kaizen event performance using data envelopment analysis. IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2008, January 2017, 649–654. Search in Google Scholar

35 Moore, R. (2007). 8-Kaizen. In: Moore, R. (2007). Selecting the Right Manufacturing Improvement Tools (pp. 159–172). Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington. Search in Google Scholar

36 Nagaretinam, M. (2005). Implementing Kobetsu Kaizen steps in manufacturing company Goodway Rubber Industries (M) Sdn Bhd. Kolej Universiti Teknikal Kebangsaan Malaysia. Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering, 87. Search in Google Scholar

37 Omoush, M., Moflih, M., & Almetrami, R. (2020). Evaluating the Five Kaizen Success Measurements through Employees Work Improvement and its Effects on Overall Work and Quality of Services: Empirical Study of Insurance Companies in Jordan. International Review of Management and Marketing, 10(4), 43. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.9994 Search in Google Scholar

38 Parsa, M., Jaferi, F., & Biranvand, M. (2016, September). Performance Evaluation using Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Fuzzy TOPSIS technique Case Study: National Iranian Gas Company. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Detroit, Michigan, USA (pp. 23-25) https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1901013h Search in Google Scholar

39 Raval, S. J., Kant, R., & Shankar, R. (2019). Benchmarking the Lean Six Sigma performance measures: a balanced score card approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(6), 1921-1947. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2018-0160 Search in Google Scholar

40 Roudini, M. (2015). Application of fuzzy ahp and fuzzy topsis in selecting proper contractors: case of Sistan and Baluchistan province Gas Company [Doctoral dissertation, Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU)-Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi (DAÜ)]. Search in Google Scholar

41 Saghafian, S., & Hejazi, S. R. (2005, November). Multicriteria group decision making using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS procedure. In International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce (CIMCA-IAWTIC'06) (Vol. 2, pp. 215-221). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/cimca.2005.1631471 Search in Google Scholar

42 Salih, M. M., Zaidan, B. B., Zaidan, A. A., & Ahmed, M. A. (2019). Survey on fuzzy TOPSIS state-of-the-art between 2007 and 2017. Computers & Operations Research, 104, 207-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2018.12.019 Search in Google Scholar

43 Singh, K. (2007). Quantitative social research methods. Sage Publications Inc. Search in Google Scholar

44 Taticchi, P., & Balachandran, K. R. (2008). Forward performance measurement and management integrated frameworks. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 16(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/18347640810913807 Search in Google Scholar

45 Tavana, M., Shaabani, A., & Valaei, N. (2020). An integrated fuzzy framework for analyzing barriers to the implementation of continuous improvement in manufacturing. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 38(1), 116–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-06-2019-0196 Search in Google Scholar

46 Thessaloniki, R. (2006). KAIZEN Definition & Principles in brief: A Concept & tool for employees in evolvement. Search in Google Scholar

47 Tsao, L., Rau, P. L. P., & Ma, L. (2015). Development of a Quick Instrument Measuring Kaizen Culture (for Chinese. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(February 2016), 4708–4715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.567 Search in Google Scholar

48 Tzeng, G.-H., & Huang, J.-J. (2011). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. CRC Press. Search in Google Scholar

49 Vento, M. O., Alcaraz, J. L. G., Macías, A. A. M., & Loya, V. M. (2016). The impact of managerial commitment and kaizen benefits on companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27(5), 692–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-02-2016-0021 Search in Google Scholar

50 Wu, H.-Y., Tzeng, G.-H., & Chen, Y.-H. (2009). A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on a Balanced Scorecard. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 10135–10147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.005 Search in Google Scholar

51 Yaakob, A. M. B. (2017). Multi Criteria Decision Making Methodology for Fuzzy Rule Based Systems and Networks Using TOPSIS [Doctoral dissertation, University of Portsmouth]. Search in Google Scholar