[
1. Antončič, B., Auer Antončič, J., Juričič, D. (2015), Družinsko podjetništvo: značilnosti v Sloveniji. Ljubljana: EY 2015. Available at: https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_si/topics/family-business/survey/survey-family-business-characteristics-slovenia.pdf / Accessed May 5, 2021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Arregle, J. L., Chirico, F., Kano, L., Kundu, S. K., Majocchi, A., Schulze, W. S. (2021), Family firm internationalization: Past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 52 No. 6, pp. 1159-1198.10.1057/s41267-021-00425-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Astrachan, J. H., Allen, I. E., Spinelli, S. (2002), Mass Mutual Raymond Institute American Family Business Survey. Springfield, Ma: Mass Mutual Financial Group.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Astrachan, J., Shanker, M. (2003), Family Businesses’ Contribution to the U.S. Economy: A Closer Look, Family Business Review, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 211-219.10.1177/08944865030160030601
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Aulawi, H., Sudirman, I., Suryadi, K. Govindaraju, R. (2009), Knowledge sharing behavior, antecedent and their impact on the individual innovation capability. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, Vol. 5 No. 12, pp. 2238-2246.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Cabrera-Suárez, K., De Saa-Pérez, P., García-Almeida, D. (2001), The succession process from a resource and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 37–46.10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00037.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Cakar, N. D., Ertuerk, A. (2010), Comparing innovation capability of small and medium-sized enterprises: examining the effects of organizational culture and empowerment. Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 325-359.10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00297.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Calabrò, A., Vecchiarini, M., Gast, J., Campopiano, G., De Massis, A., Kraus, S. (2019), Innovation in family firms: A systematic literature review and guidance for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 317-355.10.1111/ijmr.12192
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Cavusgil, S., Tamer, R., Calantone, J., Zhao, Y. (2003), Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 6-21.10.1108/08858620310458615
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Cefis, E., Marsili, O. (2006), Survivor: The role of innovations in firm’s survival. Research policy, Vol. 35, pp. 626-641.10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Chirico, F. (2008), Knowledge Accumulation in Family Firms: Evidence from Four Case Studies. International Small Business Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 433–462.10.1177/0266242608091173
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Combs, J. G., Shanine, K. K., Burrows, S., Allen, J. S., Pounds, T. W. (2020), What do we know about business families? Setting the stage for leveraging family science theories. Family Business Review, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 38-63.10.1177/0894486519863508
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Lichtenthaler, U. (2013), Research on Technological Innovation in Family Firms: Present Debates nad Future Directions. Family Business review, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 10-31.10.1177/0894486512466258
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Duh, M. (2014), Family business succession as knowledge creation process. Kybernetes, Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 699 – 714.10.1108/K-08-2013-0172
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Duh, M., Letonja, M., Vadnjal, J. (2015), Educating Succeeding Generation Entrepreneurs in Family Businesses - the case of Slovenia. Available at: http://www.intechopen.com/books/entrepreneurship-education-and-training10.5772/58950
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Eddleston, K., Otondo, R., Kellermanns, F. W. (2008), Conflict, participative decision making, and multi-generational ownership: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 456–484.10.1111/j.1540-627X.2008.00252.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Erdogan, I., Rondi, E. De Massis, A., (2019), “Managing the tradition and innovation paradox in family firms: a family imprinting perspective”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 1-35.10.1177/1042258719839712
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. European Comission (2020), Council conclusions of 12 May 2009 on a strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (‘ET 2020’) Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52009XG0528(01)&from=EN / Accessed May 5, 2021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. European Commission (2008), COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS “Think Small First” A “Small Business Act” for EuropeAvailable at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52008DC0394&from=EN / Accessed May 5, 2021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. European Family Businesses (2017), Facts and Figures. Available at: http://www.europeanfamilybusinesses.eu/ / Accessed May 5, 2021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Filser, M., De Massis, A., Gast, J., Kraus, S., Niemand, T. (2018), Tracing the roots of innovativeness in family SMEs: The effect of family functionality and socioemotional wealth. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 609-628.10.1111/jpim.12433
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Ganzaroli, A., Fiscato, G., Pilotti, L. (2006), Does business succession enhance firm’s innovation capacity? Results from an exploratory analysis in Italian SMEs”, “Departmental Working Papers 2006-29, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/e/pfi64.html / Accessed May 5, 202110.2139/ssrn.944043
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Glas, M., Herle, J., Lovšin Kozina, F., Vadnjal, J. (2006), The state of family firm management in Slovenia. Presented at 2nd Workshop on Family Firm Management Research, EIASM, Nice.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Hauck, J., Prügl, R., (2015), Innovation activities during intra-family leadership succession in family firms: An empirical study from a socioemotional wealth perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 104-118.10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.11.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Hurt, T.H., Teigen, C.W., (1977), The development of a measure of perceived organizational innovativeness. Communication Yearbook, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 377-385.10.1080/23808985.1977.11923693
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Jackson, D. N. (1976), Personality Inventory Manual. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Jackson, D.N. (1994), Jackson Personality Inventory—Revised Manual. Port Heron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A. (2002), Feuding Families: When conflict does a family firm good. Presented at 62nd meeting of the Academy of management, Denver, August.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Kogut, B., Zander, U. (1992), knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Studies, Vol. 3 No., pp. 383-397.10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Kraus, S., Pohjola, M., Koponen, A. (2012), Innovation in family firms: an empirical analysis linking organizational and managerial innovation to corporate success. Review of Managerial Science, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 265-286.10.1007/s11846-011-0065-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Laforet, S. (2012), Inovation in small family Businesses. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Laforet, S. (2013), Innovation characteristics of young and old family-owned businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 204-224.10.1108/14626001311298493
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Langlois, R. (2007), The entrepreneurial theory of the firm and the theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of management studies, Vol. 44 No. 7, pp. 1107-1124.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00728.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., Steier, L. P. (2004), Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 305-328.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00047.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Litz, R. A. Kleysen, R. F., (2001), Your old Men Shall Dream Dreams, Your Young Men Shall See Visions: Toward a Theory of Family Firm Innovation with Help from the Brubeck Family. Family Business Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 335–352.10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00335.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Mahto, R. V., Chen, J. S., McDowell, W. C., Ahluwalia, S. (2019), Shared identity, family influence, and the transgenerational intentions in family firms. Sustainability, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 1130.10.3390/su11041130
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Mandl, I. (2008), Overview of family business relevant issues. Final Report, project on behalf of the European Commission. Austrian Institute for SME Research: Vienna.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Marcati, A., Guido, G. Peluso, A. M. (2008), The role of SME entrepreneurs’ innovativeness and personality in the adaption of innovations. Research policy, Vol. 37 No. 9, pp. 1579-1990.10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. McCann, G., Upton, N.B. (2001), The Holistic Model: Destroying Myths and Creating Value in Family Business (17-19), Family Business Gathering Publication. Stetson University Press. Deland, Fl.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. (2010), Family ownership and acquisition behavior in publicly traded companies. Strategic management journal, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 201-223.10.1002/smj.802
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H. (2011), family and lone founder ownership and strategic behaviour: Social context, identity, and institutional logics. Journal of management studies, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 1-25.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00896.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Miller, D., Steier, L., Le Breton-Miller, I. (2003), Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family business. Journal of business venturing, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 513-531.10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Mohanakrishnan, R. (2020), FAMILY Business – Methods and Essentials of Building Business Families. Notion Press.com.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Molly, V., Laveren, E., Jorissen, A. (2012), Intergenerational Differences in Family Firms: Impact on Capital Structure and Growth Behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 703-725.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00429.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Nonaka, I. von Krogh, G. (2009), Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory. Organization Science, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 635–652.10.1287/orsc.1080.0412
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995), The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Nonaka, I., (1994), “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”. Organization Science, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 14–37.10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Prajogo, D. I., & Ahmed, P. K. (2006), Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 499-515.10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00450.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Roessl, D., Fink, M., Kraus, S. (2010), Are family firms fit for innovation? Towards an agenda for empirical research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Vol. 2 No. 3-4, pp. 366–380.10.1504/IJEV.2010.037118
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Rondi, E., De Massis, A., Kotlar, J. (2019), Unlocking innovation potential: A typology of family business innovation postures and the critical role of the family system. Journal of Family Business Strategy, Vol. 10 No. 4, 100236.10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.12.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Siguaw, J.A., Simpson, P.M. Enz, C.A. (2006), “Conceptualizing innovation orientation: A framework for study and integration of innovation research”. The journal of product innovation management, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 556-574.10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00224.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Smyrnios, K., Romano, C., Tanewski, G. A., Karofsky, P. I., Millen, R., Yilmaz, M. R. (2003), Work Family Conflict: A study of American and Australian family businesses. Family Business Review, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 35-51.10.1111/j.1741-6248.2003.00035.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Tajeddini, K., Trueman, M. (2008), The potential for innovativeness: a tale of the Swiss watch industry, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 24 No. 1-2, pp. 169-184.10.1362/026725708X273984
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Vadnjal, J. (2005), Razvojna usmerjenost družinskih podjetij v Sloveniji. Doktorska disertacija. Ljubljana: Ekonomska fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Vekić, M. (2015), Obrazovanje u novome ruhu: cjeloživotno učenje i obrazovanje odraslih. Hrvatski jezik: znanstveno-popularni časopis za kulturu hrvatskoga jezika, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 5-14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Verhees, Fr. J. H. M., Meulenberg, M. T. G. (2004), Market orientation, innovativeness, product innovation and performance in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 134-154.10.1111/j.1540-627X.2004.00102.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. Wang, C-L., Ahmed, P.K. (2004), The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 303-313.10.1108/14601060410565056
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. Zahra, S. A. (2005), Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 23–40.10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00028.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. Ženko, Z., Mulej, M. (2014), Preconditions for the management of invention-innovation diffusion process. International journal of productivity management and assessment technologies, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 39-50.10.4018/ijpmat.2014010104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. Ženko, Z., Šardi, V. (2014), Systemic thinking for socially responsible innovations in social tourism for people with disabilities. Kybernetes, Vol. 43 No. 3/4, pp. 652-666.10.1108/K-09-2013-0211
]Search in Google Scholar
[
61. Žmuk, B. (2017), Are publicly available online business lists appropriate to be used as sampling frames in Croatian business surveys? Business Systems Research, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 26–39.10.1515/bsrj-2017-0014
]Search in Google Scholar
