[
1. Aldikaçti, Orhan. Anayasa Hukukumuzun Gelişmesi ve 1961 Anayasasi (Development of Constitution Law 1961 Constitution). istanbul: Yenilik Press, 1973.]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Bagceci (Tacir), Hamide. “Anayasa, Kurucu iktidar Ve Meşruiyet ilişkisi” (Constitution, Founding Authority and Legitimacy Relationship). Journal of Yeditepe University Faculty of Law Vol.17, No. 1 (2020): 339–384.]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Bagceci, Hamide. Siyasal Katilim Araci Olarak Referandum: Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği Uygulamalari (Referendum As a Tool For Political Participation: EU and Turkey Practices). istanbul: Oniki Levha Press, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Baker, Lynn A. “Direct Democracy and Discrimination: A Public Choice Perspective.” Chicago-Kent Law Review Vol. 67 (1991): 708–775.]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Batum, Süheyl. Siyasal Katilma Biçimi Olarak Referendum (Referendum as a Political Participation Method). Unpublished PhD Thesis. istanbul: istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences, 1986.]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Beigbeder, Yves. “Referendum”: 696–706. In: Heidelberg: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Belko, Marian, and Lubomir Kopecek. “Referendum in theory and practice: the history of the Slovak referendums and their consequences.” Stredoevropske politicke studie 5 (2003): 1–10.]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Bilir, Faruk. “Anayasa Yapimina Yönelik Değerlendirmeler” (Analyses on Constitution-Making). Gazi University Law Faculty Journal (2008): 551–564.]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Blount, Justin. “Participation in constitutional design”: 38–57. In: Tom Ginsburg and Rosalind Dixon, eds. Comparative Constitutional Law Participation in Constitutional Design. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Braunstein, Richard. Initiative and Referendum Voting: Governing Through Direct Democracy in the United States. LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Butler, David, and Austin Ranney. “Summing Up”: 221–222. In: David Butler and Austin Ranney, eds., Referendums: A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Policy Research, 1978.]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Celik, Metin. “Avrupa Birliği’nde Yaşanan Meşruiyet Krizi” (Legitimacy Crisis in the EU). Gazi University School of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal (2013): 151–190.]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Crook, Malcolm. “Ma volonte est celle du peuple: Voting in the Plebiscite and Parliamentary Elections During Napoleon’s Hundred Days. April-May 1815.” French Historical Studies 2009, 32 (4): 619-645.10.1215/00161071-2009-011]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Gözler, Kemal. Kurucu iktidar (Founding Government). Bursa: Ekin Publishing, 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Gözler, Kemal. Türk Anayasa Hukuku Dersleri (Turkish Constitution Law Lesson). Bursa: Ekin Publishing, 2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Gül, Mehmet Şener. Anayasa Hukuku Açisindan Kurucu Referandum (Constituent Referendum with Respect to Constitution Law). Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Ankara: Ankara University, Institute of Social Sciences, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Karakartal, Bener. “Bir Siyasal bir Siyasal Katilma Turu ‘Olarak Referandum ve 1961 Turk Anayasa Referandumu” (Referendum as a Type of Political Participation and 1961-dated Turkish Constitution Referendum). istanbul University Journal of the Faculty of Economics Vol. 38, No.3-4 (2011): 161– 180.]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Kelsen, Hans. Allegemine Staatslehre, Berlin: Springer, 1925.]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Kucherenkia, Petr A., Badma V. Sangadzhieva, and Murad C. Velibek. “Legal Nature and Functions of Referendum in Constitutional Law Theory.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education Vol. 11, No. 16 (2016): 8764–8770.]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Lijpart, Arend. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1984.10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w2t]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Lipset, Seymour Martin. Political Man. Mercury Books, 1963.]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Loughlin, Martin. “On Constituent Power”: 149–224. In: Michael W. Dowdle and Micheal Wilkinson, eds. Constitutionalism Beyond Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Möckli, Silvano. “Direct Democracy in Nine Countries: A Survey.” Paper presented at the conference “Democrazie e referendum”, Societt Italiana di Studi Elettorali, IV. Convengno Internazionale (Prato, October 3-5, 1991): 1– 18 // https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/251611/1/Silvano%20Moeckli%20Direct%2 0Democracy%20in%20Nine%20Countries.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Möckli, Silvano. Direkte Demokratie. Ein intenationaler Vergleich. Bern: Verlag Paul Haupt, 1994.]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Negri, Antonio. Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State. University of Minnesota Press, 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Norman, Adamson S., and Sarfo Kantanka Kwadwo. “The Role of Referendum: A Case of Ghana.” African Journal of History and Culture Vol.1, No.1 (2009): 1–5.]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Özbudun, Erun. Türk Anayasa Hukuku, Turkish Constitutional Law. Ankara: Yetkin Press, 2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Qvortrup, Matt. “Is the Referendum a Constitutional Safeguard?” // http://www.iandrinstitute.org/docs/Qvortrup-Is-the-Referendum-a- Constitutional-Safeguard-IRI.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Qvortrup, Matt. The Referendum and Other Essays on Constitutional Politics. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing, 2019.10.5040/9781509929320]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Reilly, Shauna. Direct Democracy: A Double-Edged Sword. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2018.10.1515/9781626377189]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Rios, Joel Colon. “The Legitimacy of the Juridical Power, Constituent: Democracy and the Limits of Constitutional Reform.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal Vol.48 (2010): 235–237.]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Rios, Joel Colon. “The Second Dimension of Democracy: The People and Their Constitution.” Baltic Journal of Law and Politics Vol. 2, No. 2 (2009): 1–30.10.2478/v10076-009-0009-5]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Roznai, Yaniv. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: A Study of the Nature and Limits of Constitutional Amendment Powers. A thesis submitted to the Department of Law of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Şahbaz, ibrahim. Yari Doğrudan Demokrasi Kurumu Olarak Referandum ve Turkiye (Referendum as a Semi-Direct Democracy Institution and Turkey). Ankara: Yetkin Press, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Saglam, Fazil. Anayasa Hukuku Ders Notlari (Constitutional Law Lecture Notes). Nicosia: Near East University Publications, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Sartori, Gioavanni. Return to Democracy Theory. Trans. Tuncer
Karamustafaoglu and Mehmet Turhan. Ankara: Yetkin Press, 1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Schmitt, Carl. Constitutional Theory. Trans. J. Seitzer. Duke University Press, 2008 [1928].10.2307/j.ctv1131cm8]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Setela, Maija Talvikki. Theories of Referendum and The Analysis of AgendaSetting. ProQuest Publishing, 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Şen, ilker Gökhan. Doğrudan Demokrasi (Direct Democracy). istanbul: Oniki Levha Press, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Sieyès, Emmanuel-Joseph. What is the Third Estate? Trans. M. Blondel. London: Pall Mall Press, 1963 [1789].]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Sinclair, John. “Legitimate”: 951 In: Collins Cobuild English Dictionary. London: Harper Collins Publication, 1995.]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. “Siyasal Bilgiler Fakultesi Gerekçeli Anayasa Tasarisi, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakultesi Yayinlari” (Institute of Administration Sciences Views on Justified Constitutional Draft and Election Method). Ankara University. Political Sciences Publications (1960): 9–10.]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Suksi, Markku. Bringing in the People. London: Martinus Hijnoff Publishers, 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Tanör, Bulent. iki Anayasa (Two Constitutions). istanbul: Oniki Levha Press, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Tanör, Bülent. Osmanli Türk Anayasal Gelişmeleri (Ottoman -Turkish Constitution Developments). istanbul: Yapi Kredi Press, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. TBMM Research Center. “Bir Doğrudan Demokrasi Araci Olarak Referandum Uygulama Örnekleri, Turkiye-ABD- Avrupa Örnekleri” (As a Direct Tool For Democracy; Cases on Referendum Practices): Ahmet Yildiz, Ercan Durdular, Mehmet Solak, and Hudai Şencan, eds. Turkey-USA- Europe Case Models. Ankara: TBMM Press, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Teziç, Erdoğan. Anayasa Hukuku (Constitutional Law). istanbul: Beta Press, 2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Tierney, Stephen. “Should the People Decide: Referendums in a Post-Sovereign Age, the Scottish and Catalonian Cases.” Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy Vol. 45, No. 2 (2016): 99–118.10.5553/NJLP/.000050]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Tierney, Stephen. “Constitutional Referendums: A Theoretical Enquiry.” Modern Law Review Vol. 72, No. 3 (2009): 360–383.10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00749.x]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Tierney, Stephen. Constitutional Referendums: The Theory and Practice of Republican Deliberation. Oxford University Press, 2012.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592791.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Ulari, Pier Vincenzo. “Introduction”: 1–20. In: Michale Gallagher and Pier Vincenzo Uleri, eds. The Referendum Experience in Europe. Macmillan Publishers, 1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Voigtlander, Nico. and Hans, Joanchim Voth. “Highway to Hitler.” National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 20150 (2014):1–51.10.3386/w20150]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Wambaugh, Sarah. A Monograph on Plebiscites with a Collection of Official Documents. Oxford University Press, 1920.10.2307/1106470
]Search in Google Scholar
[
1. Law No: 70. Official Gazette: 05.08.1982 / 17773.]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Law No: 157, Resolution Date:12.12.1960. Official Gazette
:16.12.1960/10682.]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Law No: 2324, Resolution Date: 27.10.1980. Official Gazette:
28.10.1980/12145.10.2307/3560453]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. YSK Law No: 458. Official Gazette: 20.11.1982/17874.]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. TBMM Presidency, Law No: 1, Resolution Date: 12.06.1960. Official Gazette: 14.06.1960/10525.]Search in Google Scholar