[
1. Apse, Diāna. “Tiesību palīgavoti un Satversmes tiesa.” Scientific Papers. University of Latvia [Juridiskā zinātne. Latvijas Universitātes Raksti] Vol. 703 (Law) (2006): 7–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Apse, Diāna. “The Influence of Subsidiary Sources of Law on the Quality of Legal Acts in the Legislative Process and the System of National Governance.” Collection of research papers in conjunction with the international scientific conference ‘The Quality of Legal Acts and its Importance in Contemporary Legal Space’ (Riga, October 4-5, 2012): 56–68.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Balodis, Kaspars. “Labas ticības principa loma mūsdienu Latvijas civiltiesībās.” Likums un Tiesības 4, no. 9 (2002): 279–286.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Balodis, Kaspars. Ievads civiltiesībās. Riga: Zvaigzne, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Berent, Bernhard, Herbert Ehlers, G. Blaese, Carl von Schilling, and T. Zimmermann. “Lettlands Zivilgesetzbuch vom 28. Januar 1937.” In: Ernst Plates. Riga: Einzeldarstellungen, 1938.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. “Bērns – nevēlams bankas klients. Bērnu un jauniešu tiesības.” Latvijas Republikas tiesībsarga (2020 gada ziņojums) // www.tiesibsargs.lv/uploads/content/tiesibsargs_2020_gada_zinojums_final_1613044295.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Brox, Hans, and Wolf-Dietrich Walker. Allgemeines Schuldrecht. Vol. 44. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2020.10.17104/9783406747472
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Brox, Hans, and Wolf-Dietrich Walker. Allgemeiner Teil des BGB. Vol. 34. Munich: Carl Heymanns, 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. De Koker, Louis, “Aligning anti-money laundering, combating of financing of terror and financial inclusion: questions to consider when FATF standards are clarified.” Journal of Financial Crime 18, no.4 (2011): 361–386 // https://doi.org/10.1108/13590791111173704.10.1108/13590791111173704
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. De Koker, Louis, Supriya Sindh, and Jonathan Capal. “Closure of Bank Accounts of Remittance Service Providers—Global Challenges and Community Perspectives in Australia.” University of Queensland Law Journal 36 no. 1 (2017): 119–154 // https://ssrn.com/abstract=3094277.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Eckert, Jörn. Schuldrecht: Allgemeiner Teil. Vol. 4. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2004.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. “FATF Clarifies Risk-Based Approach: Case-by-Case, Not Wholesale De-Risking.” Statement of the Financial Action Task Force (Paris, October 23, 2014) // www.fatf-gafi.org/documents/documents/rba-and-de-risking.html.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. “Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach. The Banking Sector.” Financial Action Task Force (October 2014) // http://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/Risk-Based-Approach-Banking-Sector.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Grūtups, Andris, and Erlens Kalniņš. Civillikuma komentāri. Trešā daļa. Lietu tiesības, īpašums. 2. izd. Riga: Tiesu namu aģentūra, 2002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Iļjanova [Rezevska], Daiga. “Vispārējo tiesību principu funkcionālā nozīme rakstīto tiesību normu piemērošanā.” Scientific Papers. University of Latvia [Juridiskā zinātne. Latvijas Universitātes Raksti] Vol. 719 (Law) (2007): 59–75.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Jelisejevs, Aleksejs. “Crucial Issues with Legal Protection of Consumers’ Human Rights when Banks Unilaterally Close Accounts.” Athens Journal of Law 7, no. 4 (2021): 617–634 // DOI: 10.30958/ajl.7-4-11.10.30958/ajl.7-4-11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Jelisejevs, Aleksejs. “Crucial Issues with Legal Protection of Consumers Human Rights when Banks unilaterally Close Accounts”: 163–180. In: A Contemporary Anthology of Law. Athens: Athens Institute for Education and Research, 2022.10.30958/ajl.7-4-11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Jelisejevs, Aleksejs. “Good Faith-Based Approach as a Way to Protect Payment Service Consumers’ Rights when Banks Unilaterally Terminate Contractual Relations.” Collection of Materials XXII International Scientific Conference of Turiba University (Riga, April 21-22, 2021): 59–67 // https://www.turiba.lv/storage/files/xxii-conference-2021.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Kessler, Friedrich. “Contracts of Adhesion - Some Thoughts About Freedom of Contract.” Columbia Law Review 43 (1943): 629–642.10.2307/1117230
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Krons, Mīrons. “Civillikuma pirmais pants (Laba ticība kā tiesiskas rīcības kritērijs).” Tieslietu ministrijas Vēstnesis no. 2 (1937): 270–301.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Kull, Irene, “European and Estonian Law of Obligations—Transposition of Law or Mutual Influence.” Juridica International IX/2004 (University of Tartu, 2004): 32–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Kūtris, Gunārs. “Iesaldēšana, arestēšana un konfiskācija: cilvēktiesības un kriminālprocesa intereses bankas kontos.” Jurista Vārds no. 39 (1149) (September 29, 2020): 16–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Larenz, Karl. Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts Band I Allgemeiner Teil. Vol. 14. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1987.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. McKendry, Ian. “Banks Face No-Win Scenario on AML ‘De-Risking.” American Banker (November 17, 2014) // https://www.americanbanker.com/news/banks-face-no-win-scenario-on-aml-de-risking
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Meļķisis, Edgars. “Satversmes tiesas spriedums. Valsts nekustamā īpašuma aģentūras lietā saistībā ar tiesību vienotības principu.” Likums un Tiesības 1, no. 1 (1999): 22–24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Ozoliņš, Osvalds. “Jaunā Civillikuma ievads. Raksti par Prezidenta K. Ulmaņa Civillikumu.” In: Tieslietu Ministrijas Vēstneša, 1. burtnīcas pielikums. Riga: Tieslietu ministrijas izdevums, 1939.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Peczenik, Aleksander. “Principles of Law: The Search for Legal Theory.” Rechtstheorie no. 1 (1971): 17–36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Peczenik, Aleksander. On Law and Reason. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989.10.1007/978-1-4020-8381-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. “Remarks by Acting Under Secretary Adam Szubin [USA] at the ABA/ABA Money Laundering Enforcement Conference” (Washington, DC, November 14, 2016) // https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/jl0608.aspx.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Rezevska, Daiga. Vispārējo tiesību principu nozīme un piemērošana. Riga: Daiga Rezevska, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Riemer, Hans Michael. Die Einleitungsartikel des Schweizerschen Zivilgesetzbuches (Art. 1–10 ZGB). Eine Einführung. Bern: Stämpfli, 2003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Roth, Günter H. Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch. Bd. 2. Munich: Schuldrecht Allgemeiner, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Schulze, Reiner, ed. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Handkommentar. Vol. 9. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Siklósi, Iván. “Private Autonomy and Its Restrictions in Roman Law: An Overview Regarding the Law of Contracts and Succession.” Elte Law Journal 2 (2019): 9–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Slicāne, Evija. “Labas ticības princips un tā piemērošana Latvijas civiltiesībās.” Jurista Vārds no. 6 (February 6, 2007): 5-13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Vītoliņa, Baiba. Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības pamati. Riga: Apgāds Zvaigzne, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Von Bar, Christian. Towards a European Civil Code. 4th revised and expanded edition. Ed. Arthur Hartkamp, Martijn Hesselink, Ewoud Hondius, and Edgar du Perron. Boston: Kluwer Law International, 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Weitzenböck, Emily M. “Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Contracts Formed and Performed by Electronic Agents.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (March 2004): 83–110 // DOI: 10.1007/s10506-004-1908-0.10.1007/s10506-004-1908-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Zadraks, Gints. “Direktīvas 93/13/EEK par netaisnīgiem noteikumiem patērētāju līgumos nepieciešamā reforma.” Likums un Tiesības 7, no. 4 (68) (2005): 103–107.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Zimmermann, Reinhard. The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
1. Citadele Bank General Terms of Transactions No. VDN/NO-S-FJ-LV-0819.10-LV. In Force from September 14, 2019 // https://online.citadele.lv/pwww/apps/p/agreement_doc/language/LV/location/LV/residence/RN/service/VDN/type/JF/?filename=agreement.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Civil Law of the Republic of Latvia [Civillikums]. Valdības Vēstnesis, No. 41, 20 February 1937.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Consumer Rights Protection Law of the Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Vēstnesis, No. 104/105, 01.04.1999.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L 337, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L141, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union, L 304, 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Directive 2014/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on the comparability of fees related to payment accounts, payment account switching and access to payment accounts with basic features. Official Journal of the European Union, L 257, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Judgment of Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 4 February 2003 in case No. 2002-06-01 // www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2002-06-01_Spriedums.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Judgment of Department for Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court Senate of the Republic of Latvia of 7 March 2006 in case No. SKA-59 // https://at.gov.lv/files/uploads/files/archive/department3/2006/ska59-2006.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 17 December 2012 in case No. C12153910 // https://at.gov.lv/downloadlawfile/701.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 12 March 2013 in case No. SKC-108/2013 // http://at.gov.lv/downloadlawfile/3002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 14 September 2016 in case No. C10100611 // http://www.at.gov.lv/downloadlawfile/186.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 27 October 2017 in case No. C09020614. LV:AT:2017:1027.C09020614.1.S.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 30 June 2017 in case No. C33439211 // https://at.gov.lv/downloadlawfile/5210.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court Senate of the Republic of Latvia of 12 March 2020 in case No. C68278418. LV:AT:2020:0312.C68278418.8.S.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court Senate of the Republic of Latvia of 16 December 2020 in case No. C30501917. LV:AT:2020:1216.C30501917.11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court Senate of the Republic of Latvia of 17 December 2019 in case No. C04169414. LV:AT:2019:1217.C04169414.5.S.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court Senate of the Republic of Latvia of 18 December 2018 in case No C73346818. LV:AT:2018:1218.C73346818.10.S.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court Senate of the Republic of Latvia of 4 October 2006 in case No. SKC–540 // https://www.at.gov.lv/downloadlawfile/3475.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Judgment of Her Majesty’s High Court of Justice in England of 5 November 2013 in case No HC13E04267 (Dahabshiil Transfer Services Ltd v. Barclays Bank PLC) and in case No. HC13E04616 (Harada Ltd., Berkeley Credit and Guarantee Limited v. Barclays Bank PLC). EWHC 3379 (Ch) // http://www.brickcourt.co.uk/news-attachments/LWT_2013_11_31877320.pdf).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Judgment of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) of 26 October 2006 in case Elisa María Mostaza Claro v. Centro Móvil Milenium SL (C-168/05). EU:C:2006:675.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Judgment of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) of 4 June 2009 in case Pannon GSM Zrt. v. Erzsébet Sustikné Győrfi (C-243/08). EU:C:2009:350.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 27 June 2000 in joined cases Océano Grupo Editorial SA v. Rocío Murciano Quintero (C-240/98) and Salvat Editores SA v. José M. Sánchez Alcón Prades (C-241/98), José Luis Copano Badillo (C-242/98), Mohammed Berroane (C-243/98), Emilio Viñas Feliu (C-244/98). EU:C:2000:346.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Law on International Sanctions and National Sanctions of the Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Vēstnesis, No. 116, 15.02.2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Law on Payment Services and Electronic Money of the Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Vēstnesis, No. 43, 17.03.2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Law on Taxes and Fees of the Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Vēstnesis, No. 26, 18.02.1995 (as amended by law of 23.11.2016, Latvijas Vēstnesis, No. 241, 10.12.2016, and by law of 03.04.2019, Latvijas Vēstnesis, No. 75, 12.04.2019).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Law on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorism and Proliferation Financing of the Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Vēstnesis, No. 116, 30.07.2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Luminor Bank General Terms of Transactions. In Force from September 1, 2020 // www.luminor.lv/sites/default/files/docs/noteikumi/luminor-general-business-terms-01-09-2020.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Ordinance No. 2016-131 of French Republic of 10 February 2016 // www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/LEGIARTI000032006591/2016-10-01/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. SEB Bank General Terms of Transactions. In Force from January 3, 2020 // www.seb.lv/sites/default/files/web/files/prod_doc/VDN_LV.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Swedbank General Terms of Transactions No. R-18235. Dated September 25, 2020 // www.swedbank.lv/static/pdf/about/terms/visparejie_darijumu_noteikumi_25092020_LAT.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
