[
Allegretti, G. (2014), ‘Paying attention to the participants’ perceptions in order to trigger a virtuous circle,’ in N. Dias (ed.) Hope for Democracy—25 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide, São Brás de Alportel: Nelson Dias, pp. 47–63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Allegretti, G. & Copello, K. (2018), ‘Winding around money issues. What’s new in PB and which windows of opportunity are being opened?’ in N. Dias (ed.) Hope for Democracy. 30 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide, São Brás de Alportel: In Loco Association, pp. 35–53.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barros, S. A. R. & Sampaio, R. C. (2016), ‘Do citizens trust electronic participatory budgeting? Public expression in online forums as an evaluation method in Belo Horizonte,’ Policy & Internet, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 292–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.12510.1002/poi3.125
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Breuer, A.; Blomenkemper, L.; Kliesch, S.; Salzer, F.; Schädler, M.; Schweinfurth, V. & Virchow, S. (2018), ‘The potential of ICT-supported participatory communication interventions to challenge local power dynamics: Lessons from the case of Togo,’ Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, vol. 84, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.1202610.1002/isd2.12026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brun-Martos, M. I. & Lapsley, I. (2017), ‘Democracy, governmentality and transparency: Participatory budgeting in action,’ Public Management Review, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1006–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.124381410.1080/14719037.2016.1243814
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Canfield, M. C. (2018), ‘Disputing the global land grab: Claiming rights and making markets through collaborative governance,’ Law & Society Review, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 994–1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.1236710.1111/lasr.12367
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chrzanowski, M. A. & Kryglon, E. (2019), ‘Raport ewaluacyjny VI edycji budżetu obywatelskiego Miasta Krakowa 2019.’ Retrieved from https://budzet.krakow.pl [accessed 14 Jul 2022]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coleman, S. & Blumler, J. G. (2011), ‘The wisdom of which crowd? On the pathology of a listening government,’ The Political Quarterly, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2011.02210.x10.1111/j.1467-923X.2011.02210.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dias, N. & Júlio, S. (2018), ‘The next thirty years of participatory budgeting in the world start today,’ in N. Dias (ed.) Hope for Democracy. 30 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide, São Brás de Alportel: In Loco Association, pp. 15–34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dindo, P. & Massari, F. (2020), ‘The wisdom of the crowd in dynamic economies,’ Theoretical Economics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1627–1668. https://doi.org/10.3982/TE392410.3982/TE3924
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, F. (2012), ‘Participatory governance: From theory to practice,’ in D. Levi-Faur (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560530.013.003210.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560530.013.0032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friess, D.; Escher, T.; Gerl, K. & Baurmann, M. (2021), ‘Political online participation and its effects: Theory, measurement, and results,’ Policy & Internet, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 345–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.27010.1002/poi3.270
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haltofová, B. (2018), ‘Fostering community engagement through crowdsourcing: Case study on participatory budgeting,’ Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 5–12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
He, B. (2011), ‘Civic engagement through participatory budgeting in China: Three different logics at work,’ Public Administration and Development, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.59810.1002/pad.598
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hong, H.; Ye, Q.; Du, Q.; Wang, G. A. & Fan, W. (2019), ‘Crowd characteristics and crowd wisdom: Evidence from an online investment community,’ Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.2425510.1002/asi.24255
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoornaert, S.; Ballings, M.; Malthouse, E. C. & Van den Poel, D. (2017), ‘Identifying new product ideas: Waiting for the wisdom of the crowd or screening ideas in real time,’ Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 580–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.1239610.1111/jpim.12396
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Howe, J. (2006), ‘The rise of crowdsourcing: Remember outsourcing. The new source of cheap labor: Everyday people using their spare cycles to create content, solve problems, even do corporate R&D,’ Wired, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 176.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jørgensen, T. B. & Bozeman, B. (2007), ‘Public values: An inventory,’ Administration & Society, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 354–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539970730070310.1177/0095399707300703
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kisała, M. (2021), ‘The Polish experience in the development of smart cities,’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 48–64. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-001410.2478/bjes-2021-0014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klimovský, D.; Junjan, V. & Nemec, J. (2021), ‘Selected factors determining the adoption and use of participatory budgeting in Central and Eastern Europe,’ Slovak Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 230–255. https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.210206-
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lehdonvirta, V.; Oksanen, A.; Räsänen, P. & Blank, G. (2021), ‘Social media, web, and panel surveys: Using non-probability samples in social and policy research,’ Policy & Internet, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.23810.1002/poi3.238
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lotko, E. (2019), ‘Participatory budgeting in Russia—Procedural aspects,’ Bialystok Legal Studies, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 177–185. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2019.24.03.1410.15290/bsp.2019.24.03.14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muthomi, F. & Thurmaier, K. (2020), ‘Participatory transparency in Kenya: Toward an engaged budgeting model of local governance,’ Public Administration Review, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 519–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.1329410.1111/puar.13294
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD (2019), Budgeting and Public Expenditures in OECD Countries 2019, Paris: OECD Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peeters, M. A. (2012), The Globalization of the Western Cultural Revolution: Key Concepts. Operational Mechanisms, Brussels: Institute for Intercultural Dialogue Dynamics.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Poister, T. H. & Thomas, J. C. (2007), ‘The wisdom of crowds: Learning from administrators’ predictions of citizen perceptions,’ Public Administration Review, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00713.x10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00713.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Porter, A. J. & Hellsten, I. (2014), ‘Investigating participatory dynamics through social media using a multideterminant “frame” approach: The case of Climategate on YouTube,’ Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1024–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.1206510.1111/jcc4.12065
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rossmann, D. & Shanahan, E. A. (2012), ‘Defining and achieving normative democratic values in participatory budgeting processes,’ Public Administration Review, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02480.x10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02480.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schulz, D. & Newig, J. (2015), ‘Assessing online consultation in participatory governance: Conceptual framework and a case study of a national sustainability-related consultation platform in Germany,’ Environmental Policy and Governance, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.165510.1002/eet.1655
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sintomer, Y.; Herzberg, C. & Röcke, A. (2008), ‘Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges,’ International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Skrzypiec, R. & Wójkowski, G. (2020), ‘Raport nr 2 końcowy z ewaluacji proecu wdrażania VII edycji budżetu obywatelskiego Miasta Krakowa w roku 2020.’ Retrieved from https://budzet.krakow.pl [accessed 14 Jul 2022]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Surowiecki, J. (2004), The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations, New York: Doubleday.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Surowiecki, J. & Silverman, M. P. (2007), ‘The wisdom of crowds,’ American Journal of Physics, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 190–192. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.242304210.1119/1.2423042
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swaner, R. (2017), ‘Trust matters: Enhancing government legitimacy through participatory budgeting,’ New Political Science, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2017.127885610.1080/07393148.2017.1278856
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Troitiño, D. R. (2022), ‘The European Union facing the 21st Century: The digital revolution,’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 60–78. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2022-000310.2478/bjes-2022-0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wampler, B. (2008), ‘When does participatory democracy deepen the quality of democracy,’ Comparative Politics, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 61–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.5129/001041508X1291136238367910.5129/001041508X12911362383679
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wójkowski, G. (2021), ‘Raport końcowy z ewaluacji procesu wdrażania VIII edycji budżetu obywatelskiego miasta Krakowa w 2021 r.’ Retrieved from https://budzet.krakow.pl [accessed 14 Jul 2022]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zahry, N. R.; McCluskey, M. & Ling, J. (2022), ‘Risk governance during the COVID-19 pandemic: A quantitative content analysis of governors’ narratives on Twitter,’ Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Online version. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.1241210.1111/1468-5973.12412
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zawadzka-Pąk, U. K. (2021), ‘Accountability, public values, and participatory budgeting in Poland,’ Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 72–100. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2021-001110.2478/bjlp-2021-0011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zawadzka-Pąk, U. K. (2022), ‘The value of truth and citizens’ panels—from philosophical roots to practical consequences of the governance concept,’ Lex Localis—Journal of Local Self-Government, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 581–596. https://doi.org/10.4335/20.3.581-596(2022)10.4335/20.3.581-596(2022)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zawadzka-Pąk, U. K. & Tomášková, E. (2019), ‘Legal and axiological aspects of participatory budgeting procedure in Poland and the Czech Republic,’ Bialystok Legal Studies, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 165–175. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2019.24.03.1310.15290/bsp.2019.24.03.13
]Search in Google Scholar