[
Aghion, P. & Tirole, J. (1994), ‘The management of innovation,’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 1185–1209. https://doi.org/10.2307/211836010.2307/2118360
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andrijevskaja, J.; Varblane, U. & Mets, T. (2010), ‘Knowledge-based entrepreneurship in Estonia,’ CASE Network Studies and Analyses, No. 407. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.167013810.2139/ssrn.1670138
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Atlanta Fruchthandelsgesellschaft mbH and others v. Bundesamt für Ernährung und Forstwirtschaft [1991], ECJ, C-465/93, ECLI:EU:C:1995:369, 9.11.1995.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Basberg, B. (1987), ‘Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature,’ Research Policy, vol. 16, nos. 2–4, pp. 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(87)90027-810.1016/0048-7333(87)90027-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ben-Menahem, S. M.; von Krogh, G.; Erden, Z. & Schneider, A. (2016), ‘Coordinating knowledge creation in multidisciplinary teams: Evidence from early-stage drug discovery,’ Academy of Management Journal, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1308–1338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.121410.5465/amj.2013.1214
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blind, K.; Edler, J.; Frietsch, R. & Schmoch, U. (2006), ‘Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany,’ Research Policy, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.00210.1016/j.respol.2006.03.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cambridge Dictionary (n.d.), ‘Lead time’. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/lead-time [accessed 1 Jul 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Catalán, M.; Clayton, M. & Nowak, A. (2019), ‘Third party rights and the State aid procedures revisited by the European courts: An ever-sounder State aid control,’ Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpz03310.1093/jeclap/lpz033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Commission Regulation (EU) No. 651/2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty Text with EEA relevance, OJ L 187, 26.6.2014, pp. 1–78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/972 amending Regulation (EU) no. 1407/2013 as regards its prolongation and amending Regulation (EU) no. 651/2014 as regards its prolongation and relevant adjustments, C/2020/4349, OJ L 215, 7.7.2020, pp. 3–6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, pp. 9–29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Czarnitzki, D.; Ebersberger, B. & Fier, A. (2007), ‘The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany,’ Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1347–1366. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.99210.1002/jae.992
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davis, M. H.; Hall, J. A. & Mayer, P. S. (2016), ‘Developing a new measure of entrepreneurial mindset: Reliability, validity, and implications for practitioners,’ Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb000004510.1037/cpb0000045
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision SA.45185 (2017/N) – Germany – Repayable advances for the research and development programme of the Airbus X6 helicopter. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/cases/269260/269260_1958220_81_2.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision SA.49781 (2019/EV) – Italy Evaluation plan for large R&D&I aid scheme under the Fund for Sustainable Growth. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/cases1/20217/279093_2245543_138_2.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision SA.56245 (2020/EV) – Germany Evaluation plan for the block-exempted R&D tax incentive scheme “Forschungszulagengesetz” for a detailed overview of the evaluation process. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/cases1/20216/284301_2242214_192_2.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dragos, D. C. & Racolţa, B. (2017), ‘Comparing legal instruments for R&D&I: State aid and public procurement,’ European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 408–421. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.314344710.2139/ssrn.3143447
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dutt, P. K.; Ferraro, S.; Chochia, A. & Muljar, R. (2018), ‘Using patent development, education policy and research and development expenditure policy to understand differences between countries: The case of Estonia and Finland,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 8, no. 1(24), pp. 123–153. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2018-000810.1515/bjes-2018-0008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dutt, P. K.; Nyman-Metcalf, K. & Kerikmäe, T. (2021), ‘A review of different theoretical approaches towards sustainable development goals in the area of research, development and innovation,’ Retfærd, vol. 4, no. 167, pp. 89−109.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dutt, P. K.; Wahl, M. & Kerikmäe, T. (2019), ‘Using patent development, education policy and research and development expenditure policy to understand differences between countries: The case of Estonia and Germany,’ International and Comparative Law Review, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 190−233. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-000710.2478/iclr-2019-0007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eesti Pagar AS v. Ettevõtluse Arendamise Sihtasutus [2019], ECJ, C-349/17 ECLI:EU:C:2019:172, 5.3.2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (n.d.), Definition of State Aid. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/overview/index_en.html [accessed 1 Jul 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2010), Europe 2020 Strategy. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2015a), Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects: Economic Appraisal Tool for Cohesion Policy 2014–2020, DG for Regional and Urban Policy, Brussels.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2015b), State aid support schemes for RDI in the EU’s international competitors in the fields of Science, Research and Innovation, edited by Bird & Bird Brussels. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/sites/horizon2020/files/full_einri_final_study_report.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2018), Code of Best Practices for the conduct of State aid control procedures, C(2018) 4412. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/reform/best_practise/en.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2019a), Study on the Enforcement of State Aid Rules and Decisions by National Courts. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/reports/kd0219428enn.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2019b), Towards A Sustainable Europe by 2030. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/towards-sustainable-europe-2030_en [accessed 1 Jul 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2020), Fitness Check Report. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/fitness_check_-_main_report_-part1_en.pdf [accessed 1 Jul 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferraro, S.; Dutt, P. K. & Kerikmäe, T. (2017), ‘Using patent development, education policy and research and development expenditure policy to increase technological competitiveness of small European Union Member States,’ Croatian International Relations Review, vol. 23, no. 78, pp. 97−126. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-000910.1515/cirr-2017-0009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferreira, J.; Fernandes, C.; Alves, H. & Raposo, M. (2015), ‘Drivers of innovation strategies: Testing the Tidd and Bessant (2009) model,’ Journal of Business Research, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.02110.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferri, D. (2020), ‘The role of EU State aid law as a “risk management tool” in the COVID-19 crisis,’ European Journal of Risk Regulation, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.7110.1017/err.2020.71
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Framework for State Aid for Research and Development and Innovation, OJ C 198, 27.6.2014, pp. 1–29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilson, R. J. (1999), ‘The legal infrastructure of high technology industrial districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and covenants not to compete,’ 74 New York University Law Review, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 575–629. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.12450810.2139/ssrn.124508
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Griliches, Z. (1958), ‘Research costs and social returns: Hybrid corn and related innovations,’ Journal of Political Economy, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1086/25807710.1086/258077
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Griliches, Z. (1979), ‘Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth,’ The Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 92–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/300332110.2307/3003321
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groen, A. J. (2005), ‘Knowledge intensive entrepreneurship in networks: Towards a multi-level/multi-dimensional approach,’ Journal of Enterprising Culture, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021849580500006910.1142/S0218495805000069
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groen, A. J.; De Weerd-Nederhof, P. C.; Kerssens-van Drongelen, I. C.; Badoux, R. A. J. & Olthuis, G. P. (2002), ‘Creating and justifying research and development value: Scope, scale, skill and social networking of R&D,’ Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.0023210.1111/1467-8691.00232
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groen, A. J.; Wakkee, I. & De Weerd-Nederhof, P. (2008), ‘Managing tensions in a high-tech start-up: An innovation journey in social system perspective,’ International Small Business Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/026624260708465910.1177/0266242607084659
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grossman, S. & Hart, O. (1986), ‘The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration,’ Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1086/26140410.1086/261404
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hellmann, T. (2007), ‘When do employees become entrepreneurs?’ Management Science, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 919–933. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.064810.1287/mnsc.1060.0648
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holmstrom, B. (1982), ‘Moral hazard in teams,’ The Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 324–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/300345710.2307/3003457
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kattel, R. & Stamenov, B. (2018), Research and Innovation Observation Country Report 2017: Estonia, EUR 29153 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kelli, A.; Värv, A.; Mets, T.; Mantrov, V.; Birštonas, R. & Ginter, C. (2016), ‘Different regulatory models of transfer of industrial property rights in the Baltic States: A plea for harmonized approach,’ International Comparative Jurisprudence, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icj.2016.05.00110.1016/j.icj.2016.05.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirwan, P.; Van der Sijde, P. & Groen, A. (2007), ‘Early-stage networking: how entrepreneurs use their social capital to establish and develop high-technology start-ups,’ in J. Ulijn, D. Drillon & F. Lasch (eds.) Entrepreneurship, Cooperation and the Firm: The Emergence and Survival of High-Technology Ventures in Europe, Cheltenham & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 391–414. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847207227.0002210.4337/9781847207227.00022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Landes, W. M. & Posner, R. A. (2003), The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1q3z2pn10.2307/j.ctv1q3z2pn
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Landier, A. (2005), ‘Entrepreneurship and the stigma of failure,’ Entrepreneurship & Finance eJournal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.85044610.2139/ssrn.850446
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leloux, M. & Groen, A. (2009), ‘Estimating business value of academic research outcomes: Towards a multi-dimensional approach,’ International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTTC.2009.02343210.1504/IJTTC.2009.023432
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McConville, M. & Chui, W. (2017), Research Methods for Law, 2nd ed., Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mets, T.; Kaarna, K. & Kelli, A. (2010), ‘Intellectual property–lever or barrier to the globalization of knowledge-intensive SMEs of small country origin,’ Engineering Economics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 387–398.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nikulainen, T. (2008), A Historical Perspective on Patents and Industry Growth in Finland: Connections and Lags, ETLA Discussion Paper, no. 1159, Helsinki: Elinkeinoelämän Tutkimuslaitos.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nyman-Metcalf, K.; Dutt, P. K. & Chochia, A. (2014), ‘The freedom to conduct business and the right to property: The EU technology transfer block exemption regulation and the relationship between intellectual property and competition law,’ in T. Kerikmäe (ed.) Protecting Human Rights in the EU: Controversies and Challenges of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 37–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38902-3_410.1007/978-3-642-38902-3_4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palinkas, L. A.; Horwitz, S. M.; Green, C. A.; Wisdom, J. P.; Duan, N. & Hoagwood, K. (2015), ‘Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research,’ Administration and Policy in Mental Health, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y401200224193818
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paré, G.; Trudel, M.-C.; Jaana, M. & Kitsiou, S. (2015). ‘Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews,’ Information & Management, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.00810.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parsons, T. (1964), The Social System, New York: The Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plaumann & Co. v. Commission [1963], ECJ, C-25/62, ECLI:EU:C:1963:17, 15.7.1963.10.1080/00845566.1963.10396368
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Rassenfosse, G. & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2009), ‘A policy insight into the R&D—patent relationship,’ Research Policy, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.01310.1016/j.respol.2008.12.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sanso-Navarro, M. & Vera-Cabello, M. (2018), ‘The long-run relationship between R&D and regional knowledge: The case of France, Germany, Italy and Spain,’ Regional Studies, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.136047610.1080/00343404.2017.1360476
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schwartz, S. (2012), ‘An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values,’ Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.111610.9707/2307-0919.1116
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scuola Elementare Montessori v. Commission [2018], ECJ, C-622/16 P, ECLI:EU:C:2018:873, 6.11.2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shane, S.; Locke, E. & Collins, C. (2003), ‘Entrepreneurial motivation,’ Human Resource Management Review, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00017-210.1016/S1053-4822(03)00017-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Syndicat français de l’Express international (SFEI) and Others v. La Poste and Others [1996], ECJ, C-39/94, ECLI:EU:C:1996:285, 11.7.1996.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tidd, J. & Bessant, J. (2009), Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, Chichester: Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TWD Textilwerke Deggendorf GmbH v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland [1994], ECJ, C-188/92, ECLI:EU:C:1994:90, 9.3.1994.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van der Veen, M. & Wakkee, I. (2004), ‘Understanding the entrepreneurial process,’ in D. Watkins (ed.) ARPENT, Annual Review of Progress in Entrepreneurship Research, Brussels: European Foundation for Management Development, pp. 114–152.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Värv, A.; Pisuke, H.; Mets, T.; Vasamäe, E. & Kelli, A. (2010), ‘Trade secrets in the intellectual property strategies of entrepreneurs: The Estonian experience,’ Review of Central and East European Law, vol. 35, pp. 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1163/157303510X1265037824047610.1163/157303510X12650378240476
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yitshaki, R. & Kropp, F. (2018), ‘Revisiting entrepreneurial motivation and opportunity recognition,’ in M. Brännback & A. L. Carsrud (eds.) A Research Agenda for Entrepreneurial Cognition and Intention, Cheltenham & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 122–141. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784716813.0001110.4337/9781784716813.00011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zollner, M.; Fritsch, M. & Wyrwich, M. (2016), ‘An evaluation of German active labor market policies and its entrepreneurship promotion,’ Jena Economic Research Papers. Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, vol. 22, pp. 1–55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zuckerfabrik Süderdithmarschen AG v. Hauptzollamt Itzehoe and Zuckerfabrik Soest GmbH v. Hauptzollamt Paderborn [1991], ECJ, C-143/88, ECLI:EU:C:1991:65, 21.2.1991.
]Search in Google Scholar
