<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In our academic environment, borders are usually treated within the territorial-institutional demarcation or the political resistance against such actions. In his essay “What is a Border?” Étienne Balibar focuses on political examples. What kind of demarcation is at work here? What kind of boundaries integrate everything in the space of social historical relations as if there was nothing else outside us? Politically speaking, we have created the institution of border, but according to the Australian philosopher Jeff Malpas, our being-in-the-world implies all-encompassing places as the material condition for the appearance of things and living creatures. The Hungarian term “<italic>határ</italic>” (border) has a specific meaning referring to the natural environment of a settlement: not a concrete line, but a field with depth around the built habitat of people. Can we apply a border theory based on political issues to our neighbourhood with non-human creatures? To what extent will the concept of border be changed if we consider different spaces of contact making? Through the close reading of some fragments from Henry David Thoreau’s <italic>Walden</italic> and Jack London’s <italic>White Fang</italic>, my paper shows how literature and the arts help us ask and investigate such questions.</p></abstract>

In our academic environment, borders are usually treated within the territorial-institutional demarcation or the political resistance against such actions. In his essay “What is a Border?” Étienne Balibar focuses on political examples. What kind of demarcation is at work here? What kind of boundaries integrate everything in the space of social historical relations as if there was nothing else outside us? Politically speaking, we have created the institution of border, but according to the Australian philosopher Jeff Malpas, our being-in-the-world implies all-encompassing places as the material condition for the appearance of things and living creatures. The Hungarian term “határ” (border) has a specific meaning referring to the natural environment of a settlement: not a concrete line, but a field with depth around the built habitat of people. Can we apply a border theory based on political issues to our neighbourhood with non-human creatures? To what extent will the concept of border be changed if we consider different spaces of contact making? Through the close reading of some fragments from Henry David Thoreau’s Walden and Jack London’s White Fang, my paper shows how literature and the arts help us ask and investigate such questions.

Border, Environment, Neighbourhood

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"Border, Environment, Neighbourhood"}

In our academic environment, borders are usually treated within the territorial-institutional demarcation or the political resistance against such actions. In...

Border, Environment, Neighbourhood

Publié en ligne: 25 févr. 2019

Pages: 35 - 52

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2018-0003

Mots clés
territorial-institutional demarcation, the space of social historical relations, non-human, spaces of contact making, literature

© 2018 István Berszán, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Border, Environment, Neighbourhood

Publié en ligne: 25 févr. 2019

Pages: 35 - 52

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2018-0003

Mots clésterritorial-institutional demarcation, the space of social historical relations, non-human, spaces of contact making, literature

© 2018 István Berszán, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Mots clés
territorial-institutional demarcation, the space of social historical relations, non-human, spaces of contact making, literature