[Armstrong, Aurelia. 2013. The Passions, Power, and Practical Philosophy: Spinoza and Nietzsche Contra the Stoics. Journal of Nietzsche Studies vol. 44, no. 1: 6–24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Balci, Mehmet Emin. 2017. The Lobster: Human Zoo or About the Sociology of Being-Here. ETHOS: Dialogues in Philosophy and Social Sciences vol.10, no. 2: 1–22.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bumin Tülin. 2010. Tartişilan Modernlik. Descartes ve Spinoza [Modernity Discussed. Descartes and Spinoza]. İstanbul: Yapi Kredi Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. San Francisco: City Lights Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza. NewYork: Zone Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Diker, Can. 2019. Modern Bireyin ‘Miyop’ Sorunu: Foucault’nun Özne ve İktidar Kavramlari Bağlaminda The Lobster Filminin Analizi [“Shortsight” Problem of the Modern Individual: Analysis of the Film The Lobster on the Context of Foucault’s Subject and Power Concepts]. SineFilozofi vol. 4: 91–105.]Search in Google Scholar
[Erdoğan Tuğran, Filiz. 2021. Performance of Affects and Imitation of Emotions: A Study on Babis Makridis’s Pity Film. Sinefilozofi Journal vol. 6: 442–454.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fransez, Moris. 2004. Spinoza’nin Tao’su: Akilli İnançtan İnançli Akla [Spinoza’s Tao: From Intelligent Faith to Faithful Reason]. İstanbul: Yol Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Güngör, Feyza Şule. 2015. Spinoza’da İyi ve Kötünün Conatus (En İyi Şekilde Varlikta Kalmakta Israr)]Search in Google Scholar
[Bağlaminda Değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of Good and Bad in Spinoza in Terms of Conatus (Persistence of All Things to be in Their Own Being in the Best Way)]. FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences) vol. 20: 131–142.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hans, Jonas. 1973. Spinoza and the Theory of Organism. In Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Marjorie Grene, 259–278. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hünler, Solmaz Zelyüt. 2003. Spinoza. İstanbul: Paradigma Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ilić, Vladana. 2021. Dystopia-En-Abyme: Analysis of The Lobster’s Narrative. Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology vol. 12, no. 2: 467–487.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jameson, Fredric. 2009. Ütopya Denen Arzu [The Desire Called Utopia]. İstanbul: Metis Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaya, Mustafa. 2017. Doğal hak kavrami bağlaminda Hobbes ve Spinoza [In the Context of Natural Rights, Hobbes and Spinoza]. The Journal of Kesit Akademi vol. 3 no. 9: 175–188.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kiliç, Sinan. 2007. Spinoza’s Investigation about the Problems of Goodness-Badness and Causality without a Traditional and Moral Judgment. Kaygi: Uludağ University Philosophy Journal vol. 9: 163–173.]Search in Google Scholar
[Laurie, Timothy and Stark, Hannah. 2021. The End of Intimate Politics in Yorgos Lanthimos’ The Lobster. New Review of Film and Television Studies vol. 19, no. 2: 200–216.]Search in Google Scholar
[Negri, Antonio. 2004. Subversive Spinoza: (Un)Contemporary Variations. New York, Manchester: Manchester University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Özcan, Hüseyin Deniz. 2020. Önsöz: İçkinlik ve Etik [Preface: Immanence and Ethics]. In İçkinlik Etiği: Nietzsche ve Spinoza [The Ethics of Immanence: Nietzsche and Spinoza], eds. Hüseyin Deniz Özcan, Orkun Tüfenk, 7–19. İstanbul: Otonom Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rutherford, Donald. 2020. Felsefi Bir İdeal Olarak Özgürlük: Nietzsche ve Öncelleri [Freedom as a Philosophical Ideal: Nietzsche and His Predecessors]. In İçkinlik Etiği: Nietzsche ve Spinoza [The Ethics of Immanence: Nietzsche and Spinoza], eds. Hüseyin Deniz Özcan, Orkun Tüfenk, 73–119. İstanbul: Otonom Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spinoza, Benedict De. [1677] 2021. Ethica. İstanbul: Alfa Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spinoza, Benedict De. 2000a. A Theologico-Political Treatise. Part I. A Penn State Electronic Classics Series Publication.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spinoza, Benedict De. 2000b. A Theologico-Political Treatise. Part IX. A Penn State-electronic Classics Series Publication.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spinoza, Benedict De. 2008. Politik İnceleme [Political Review]. Ankara: Dost Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Strauss, Leo. 1965. Natural Right and History. Canada: The University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
