Accès libre

Monte Carlo Simulation in Random Coefficient Logit Models Involving Large Sums

   | 30 mai 2014
À propos de cet article

Citez

Berry, S. (1994). Estimating discrete choice models of product differentiation, RAND Journal of Economics 25: 242-262.10.2307/2555829Search in Google Scholar

Berry, S., J. Levinsohn and A. Pakes (1995). Automobile prices in market equilibrium, Econometrica 63: 841-890.10.2307/2171802Search in Google Scholar

Bliemer, M.C.J. and J.M. Rose (2010). Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations, Transportation Research B 44: 720-734.10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Goeree, M.S. (2008). Limited information and advertising in the U.S. personal computer industry, Econometrica 76: 1017-1074.Search in Google Scholar

Harding, M.C. and J. Hausman (2007). Using a Laplace approximation to estimate the random coefficients logit model by nonlinear least squares, International Economic Review 48: 1311-1328.10.1111/j.1468-2354.2007.00463.xSearch in Google Scholar

Heiss, F. and V. Winschel (2008). Likelihood approximation by numerical integration on sparse grids, Journal of Econometrics 144: 62-80.10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Hess, S., K.E. Train and J.W. Polak (2006). On the use of a modified latin hypercube sampling (MLHS) method in the estimation of a mixed logit model for vehicle choice, Transportation Research B 40: 147-163.10.1016/j.trb.2004.10.005Search in Google Scholar

Hickernell, F.J., H.S. Hong, P. L’Ecuyer and C. Lemieux (2000). Extensible lattice sequences for quasi-Monte Carlo quadrature, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 22: 1117-1138.10.1137/S1064827599356638Search in Google Scholar

Huber, J. and K. Zwerina (1996). The importance of utility balance in efficient choice design, Journal of Marketing Research 33: 307-17.10.1177/002224379603300305Search in Google Scholar

Kessels, R., B. Jones, P. Goos and M. Vandebroek (2009). An efficient algorithm for constructing bayesian optimal choice designs, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 27: 279-291.10.1198/jbes.2009.0026Search in Google Scholar

Kessels, R., P. Goos and M. Vandebroek (2006). A comparison of criteria to design efficient choice experiments, Journal of Marketing Research 43: 409-419.10.1509/jmkr.43.3.409Search in Google Scholar

Nevo, A. (2001). Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry, Econometrica 69: 307-42.10.1111/1468-0262.00194Search in Google Scholar

Sándor, Z. (2001). Computation, Efficiency and Endogeneity in Discrete Choice Models, PhD thesis, University of Groningen.Search in Google Scholar

Sándor, Z. and K. Train (2004). Quasi-random simulation of discrete choice models, Transportation Research B 38: 313-327.10.1016/S0191-2615(03)00014-6Search in Google Scholar

Sándor, Z. and M. Wedel (2001). Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers’ prior beliefs, Journal of Marketing Research 38: 430-444.10.1509/jmkr.38.4.430.18904Search in Google Scholar

Sándor, Z. and P. András (2004). Alternative sampling methods for multivariate normal probabilities, Journal of Econometrics 120: 207-234. 10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00212-4Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2343-8894
Langue:
Anglais