Methods and procedures for the processing of feather from poultry slaughterhouses and the application of feather meal as antioxidant

[1] D. H. Baker, R. C. Blitenthal, K. P. Boebel, G. L. Czarnecki, L. L. Southern, G. M. Willis, Protein-amino acid evaluation of steam-processed feather meal. Poultry Science, 60. (1981) 1865–1872.10.3382/ps.0601865Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. Bertsch, N. Coello, A biotechnological process for treatment and recycling poultry feathers as a feed ingredients. Bioresource Technology, 96. (2005) 1703–1708.10.1016/j.biortech.2004.12.02616023573Search in Google Scholar

[3] C. H. Binley, O. R. Vasak, Friable meal produced from feathers. American Egg Poultry Review, 12. (1951) 68–70.Search in Google Scholar

[4] D. A. Blasi, T. J. Klopfenstein, J. S. Drouillard, M. H. Sindt, Hydrolysis time as a factor a ecting the nutritive value of feather meal and feather meal-blood meal combinations for growing calves. Journal of Animal Science, 69. (1991) 1272–1278.10.2527/1991.6931272x2061255Search in Google Scholar

[5] B. Bockle, R. Muller, Reduction of disulfide bonds by Steptomyces pactum during growth of chicken feathers. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 63. (1997) 790–792.10.1128/aem.63.2.790-792.1997138953216535526Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. Brandelli, D. J. Daroit, A. Riffel, Biochemical features of microbial keratinases and their production and applications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85. (2010) 1735–1750.10.1007/s00253-009-2398-520039036Search in Google Scholar

[7] K. Cotanch, S. Sniffen, H, Dann, T. Jenkins, R. Grant, Feather meal profiles studied. Feedstuffs, 78. 19. (2006) 14–24.Search in Google Scholar

[8] K. Cotanch, M. M. Van Amburgh, S. Sniffen, R. Grant, Intestinal digestibility of feather meal studied. Feedstuffs, 79. 28. (2007) 22–23.Search in Google Scholar

[9] J. Csapó, Cs. Albert, Method and procedure for processing the feather produced by poultry slaughterhouses for the application as antioxidant. 21^stInternational Conference of Chemistry. Şumuleu Ciuc, Romania, 23–27 September 2015. 31.Search in Google Scholar

[10] J. Csapó, J-né Csapó, I. Juricskai, Állati eredetű fehérjetakarmányok toll-liszt tartalmának mennyiségi meghatározása [Quantitative determination of feather meal content of animal origin protein feed]. Magyar Állatorvosok Lapja, 7. (1986) 421–426.Search in Google Scholar

[11] J. Csapó, J-né Csapó, A toll-liszt összetétele és részarányának kimutatása húslisztekben [Composition of the feather meal, and estimation of its proportion in meat meal]. Szaktanácsok, 3. (1985) 36–43.Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Csapó, I. Sarudi, Toll-fehérje a takarmányokban [Feather protein in feed]. Magyar Mezőgazdaság, 15. (1985) 13.Search in Google Scholar

[13] N. Dale, True metabolizable energy of feather meal. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 1. (1992) 331–334.10.1093/japr/1.3.331Search in Google Scholar

[14] B. O. Eggum, Evaluation of protein quality of feather meal under different treatments. Acta Agricultura Scandinavica, 20. (1970) 230–234.10.1080/00015127009433412Search in Google Scholar

[15] A. R. Garcia, A. B. Batal, N. M. Dale, A comparison of methods to determine amino acid digestibility of feed ingredients for chickens. Poultry Science, 86. (2007) 94–101.10.1093/ps/86.1.9417179421Search in Google Scholar

[16] A. Grazziotin, F. A. Pimentel, E. V. de Jong, A. Brandelli, Nutritional improvement of feather protein by treatment with microbial keratinase. Animal Feed Science Technology, 126. (2006) 135–144.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.06.002Search in Google Scholar

[17] R. Gupta, P. Ramnani, Microbial keratinases and their prospective applications: an overview. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 70. (2006) 21–33.10.1007/s00253-005-0239-816391926Search in Google Scholar

[18] C. M. Hood, M. G. Healy, Bioconversion of waste keratins: wool and feathers. Resources Conversion Recycling, 11. (1994) 179–188.10.1016/0921-3449(94)90088-4Search in Google Scholar

[19] G. Kovács, Az elhullott állatok és a melléktermékek kezelése [Treatment of animals corpses and by-products]. In: F. Bogenfürst, P. Horn, K. Kovácsné Gaál, G. Kovács (eds), Baromfitenyésztés. Digitális Tankönyvtár, (2017).Search in Google Scholar

[20] J. D. Latshaw, N. Musharaf, R. Retrum, Processing of feather meal to maximize its nutritional value for poultry. Animal Feed Science Technology, 47. (1994) 179–188.10.1016/0377-8401(94)90122-8Search in Google Scholar

[21] J. S. Moritz, J. D. Latshaw, Indicators of nutritional value of hydrolyzed feather meal. Poultry Science, 80. (2000) 79–86.10.1093/ps/80.1.79Search in Google Scholar

[22] W. C. Morris, S. L. Balloun, Effect of processing methods on utilization of feather meal by broiler chicks. Poultry Science, 52. (1973) 858–866.10.3382/ps.0520858Search in Google Scholar

[23] W. C. Morris, S. L. Balloun, Evaluation of five differently processed feather meal by nitrogen retention, net protein values, xanthine dehydrogenase activity, and chemical analysis. Poultry Science, 52. (1973) 1075–1084.10.3382/ps.0521075Search in Google Scholar

[24] E. C. Naber, S. P. Touchburn, B. D. Barnett, C. L. Margan, Effect of processing methods and amino acid supplementation of feather protein on dietary utilization by the chick. Poultry Science, 40. (1961) 1234–1245.10.3382/ps.0401234Search in Google Scholar

[25] J. E. Nocek, In situ and other methods to estimate ruminal protein and energy digestibility: A review. Journal of Dairy Science, 71. (1988) 2051–2069.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79781-7Search in Google Scholar

[26] A. A. Onifade, N. A. Al-Sane, A. A. Al-Musallam, S. Al-Zarban, A review: potentials for biotechnological applications of keratin-degrading microorganisms and their enzymes for nutritional improvement of feathers and other keratins as livestock feed resources. Bioresource Technology, 66. (1998) 1–11.10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00033-9Search in Google Scholar

[27] M. C. Papadopolous, A. R. El-Boushy, E. H. Ketelaars, Effect of different processing conditions on amino acid digestibility of feather meal determined by chick assay. Poultry Science, 64. (1985) 1729–1741.10.3382/ps.0641729Search in Google Scholar

[28] M. C. Papadopolous, A. R. El-Boushy, A. E. Roodbeen, E. H. Ketelaars, Effect of processing time and moisture content on amino acid composition and nitrogen characteristics of feather meal. Animal Feed Sci. Technol., 14. (1986) 279–290.10.1016/0377-8401(86)90100-8Search in Google Scholar

[29] G. Pohn, É. Vargáné Visi, É. Terlakyné Balla, L. Kametler, J. Csapó, A különböző technológiával készült toll-lisztek D-cisztein tartalma [D-cysteine content of the feather meals made by different technologies]. Műszaki Kémiai Napok ‘99, 27–29 April. Veszprém, (1999) 48–49.Search in Google Scholar

[30] K. R. Robbins, D. H. Baker, J. W. Finley, Studies on the utilization of lysino-alanine and lanthionine. Journal of Nutrition, 110. (1980) 907–915.10.1093/jn/110.5.9076768858Search in Google Scholar

[31] E. Tiwary, R. Gupta, Rapid conversion of chicken feather to feather meal using dimeric keratinase from Bacillus licheniformic ER-15. Journal of Bioprocessing Biotechniques, 2. 4. (2002) 123–128.Search in Google Scholar

[32] X. Wang, C. M. Parson, Effect of processing systems on protein quality of feather meal and hog hair meals. Poultry Science, 76. (1997) 491–496.10.1093/ps/76.3.4919068049Search in Google Scholar

[33] C. N. Williams, C. G. Lee, J. D. Garlich, J. C. H. Shih, Evaluation of bacterial feather fermentation product, feather lysate, as a feed protein. Poultry Science, 70. (1991) 85–90.10.3382/ps.0700085Search in Google Scholar

[34] S. Yamamura, Y. Morita, Q. Hasan, K. Yokoyama, E. Tamiya, Keratin degradation: a cooperative action of two enzymes from Stenotrophomonas sp. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 294. (2002) 1138–1143.10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00580-6Search in Google Scholar

[35] T. I. Zaghloul, A. M. Embaby, A. R. Elmaddy, Biodegradation of chicken feathers waste directly by Bacillus subtilis recombinant cells: Scaling up in a laboratory scale fermentor. Bioresource Technology, 102. (2011) 2387–2393.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.106Search in Google Scholar