The Role of Modern Techniques in Preservation of Archaeological Sites

1 Febro, D. 3D documentation of cultural heritage sites using drone and photogrammetry: A case study of Philippine UNESCO-recognized Baroque churches. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, vol. 11, no. 8, 2020, pp. 1‒14. Search in Google Scholar

2 Henderson, J., Lingle, A. M. Preventive conservation in archaeological sites: Uk policy and practice. China Cultural Heritage, no. 2, 2020, pp. 25‒35. Search in Google Scholar

3 Rebec, K. M., Deanovič, B., Oostwegel, L. Old buildings need new ideas: Holistic integration of conservation-restoration process data using heritage building information modelling. Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 55, 2022, pp. 30‒42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2022.02.005 Search in Google Scholar

4 Henderson, J., Lingle, A. M. Preventive conservation in archaeological sites. In López Varela, S. L. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2018, pp. 1‒4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119188230.saseas0476 Search in Google Scholar

5 Haddad, N. A., Fakhoury, L. A., Sakr, Y. M. A critical anthology of international charters, conventions & principles on documentation of cultural heritage for conservation, monitoring & management. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, vol. 21, no. 1, 2021, pp. 291‒310. Search in Google Scholar

6 UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 2019, Babylon [online, cited 20.05.2022]. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/278/ Search in Google Scholar

7 Barrile, V., Bilotta, G., Meduri, G. M., De Carlo, D., Nunnari, A. Laser scanner technology, ground-penetrating radar and augmented reality for the survey and recovery of artistic, archaeological and cultural heritage. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. IV-4/W4, 2017, pp. 123‒127. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W4-123-2017 Search in Google Scholar

8 Vilbig, J. M., Sagan, V., Bodine, C. Archaeological surveying with airborne LiDAR and UAV photogrammetry: A comparative analysis at Cahokia Mounds. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, vol. 33, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102509 Search in Google Scholar

9 Grilli, E. Automatic classification of architectural and archaeological 3d data. Alma Mater Studiorum – Università di Bologna, Doctoral dissertation, 2020 [online, cited 20.05.2022]. https://10.6092/unibo/amsdottorato/9347 Search in Google Scholar

10 Stylianidis, E. Photogrammetric survey for the recording and documentation of historic buildings. Cham: Springer, 2020. 270 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47310-5 Search in Google Scholar

11 Forte, M., Murteira, H. (eds) Digital cities: Between history and archaeology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020. 368 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190498900.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

12 Roca, P., Lourenço, P. B., Gaetani, A.Historic Construction and Conservation: Materials, Systems and Damage. New York: Routledge, 2019. 366 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429052767 Search in Google Scholar

13 Zhang, Y., Dong, W. Determining minimum intervention in the preservation of heritage buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, vol. 15, no. 5, 2021, pp. 698‒712. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1645237 Search in Google Scholar

14 Abdo, M., Mohamed, F. O., Orabi, A. F. Theory vs practice, transforming new cities into smart ones. A case study on the city of new Minia. Journal of Advanced Engineering Trends, vol. 41, no. 2, 2021, pp. 219‒245. https://doi.org/10.21608/jaet.2021.66385.1094 Search in Google Scholar

15 Jordan-Palomar, I., Tzortzopoulos, P., García-Valldecabres, J., Pellicer, E. Protocol to manage heritage-building interventions using heritage building information modelling (HBIM). Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 4, 2018, p. 908. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040908 Search in Google Scholar

16 Akhter, H., Promei, N. The methods and recent invented tools and techniques used in archaeology for delicately preserving the past for the future. Archaeological Discovery, vol. 6, no. 4, 2018, pp. 338‒354. https://doi.org/10.4236/ad.2018.64017 Search in Google Scholar

17 Leucci, G. Nondestructive testing for archaeology and cultural heritage. Cham: Springer, 2019. 241 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01899-3 Search in Google Scholar

18 Saaty, T., Tavana, M. The encyclicon ‒ Volume 4: A dictionary of complex decisions using the analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 2021. 919 p. Search in Google Scholar

19 Rasol, M., Pérez-Gracia, V., Fernandes, F. M., Pais, J. C., Santos-Assunçao, S., Roberts, J. S. Ground penetrating radar system: Principles. In: S. D’Amico and V. Venuti (eds.), Handbook of Cultural Heritage Analysis. Cham: Springer, 2022, pp. 705‒738. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60016-7_25 Search in Google Scholar

20 Elfadaly, A., Lasaponara, R. On the use of satellite imagery and gis tools to detect and characterize the urbanization around heritage sites: The case studies of the Catacombs of Mustafa Kamel in Alexandria, Egypt and the Aragonese castle in Baia, Italy. Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 7, 2019, p. 2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072110 Search in Google Scholar

21 Gallozzi, A., Senatore, L. J., Strollo, R. M. An overview on robotic applications for cultural heritage and built cultural heritage. SCIRES-IT SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology, vol. 9, no. 2, 2019, pp. 47‒56. https://doi.org/10.2423/i22394303v9n2p47 Search in Google Scholar

22 Piroddi, L., Calcina, S. V., Trogu, A., Ranieri, G. Automated resistivity profiling (ARP) to explore wide archaeological areas: The prehistoric site of Mont’e Prama, Sardinia, Italy. Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 3, 2020, p. 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030461 Search in Google Scholar

23 Dabbs, M. Spotlight: Magnetometry and resistivity, 2014 [online, cited 20.05.2022]. https://blogs.kent.ac.uk/digthewolds/2014/09/13/13914-spotlight-magnetometry-and-resistivity/ Search in Google Scholar

24 Biagetti, S., Alcaina-Mateos, J., Ruiz-Giralt, A., Lancelotti, C., Groenewald, P., Ibañez-Insa, J., Gur-Arie, S., Morton, F., Merlo, S. Identifying anthropogenic features at Seoke (BOTSWANA) using pXRF: Expanding the record of southern african stone walled sites. PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 5, 2021, p. e0250776. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250776 Search in Google Scholar

25 Advantages and disadvantages of lidar [online, cited 20.05.2022]. https://lidarradar.com/info/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-lidar Search in Google Scholar

26 Webb, E. K., Robson, S., MacDonald, L., Garside, D., Evans, R. Spectral and 3d cultural heritage documentation using a modified camera. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLII-2, 2018, pp. 1183‒1190. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1183-2018 Search in Google Scholar

27 Oseni, A. E., Durowoju, A. S. Application of GIS in electricity distribution: A case study of part of Ashamu Layout Kosobo, Oyo east local government area, Oyo state Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Environmental Sciences and Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, 2020, pp. 370‒381. https://doi.org/10.36263/nijest.2020.02.0106 Search in Google Scholar

28 Blaha, J., Novotny, J. Report assessing innovative restoration techniques, technologies and materials used in conservation, 2018 [online, cited 20.05.2022]. https://www.interreg-central.eu/Content.Node/D.T1.3.1-Report-innovative-techniques-technologies-materials.pdf Search in Google Scholar

29 Dario, C. A method to obtain precise determinations of relative humidity using thin film capacitive sensors under normal or extreme humidity conditions. Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 37, May-June 2019, pp. 166‒169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.11.003 Search in Google Scholar

30 Themistocleous, K., Danezis, C., Gikas, V. Monitoring ground deformation of cultural heritage sites using sar and geodetic techniques: The case study of Choirokoitia, Cyprus. Applied Geomatics, vol. 13, no. 1, 2021, pp. 37‒49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-020-00329-0 Search in Google Scholar

31 Mazzaglia, A. The information system of pompeii sustainable preservation project. A tool for the collection, management and sharing of knowledge useful for conservation and renovation of archaeological monuments. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, vol. 10, no. 1, 2021, p. 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021010014 Search in Google Scholar

32 Cabello-Briones, C., Prieto, A. J., Ortiz, P. Determination of the technical suitability of shelters for archaeological sites using fuzzy logic. Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 48, March-April 2021, pp. 211‒226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.11.006 Search in Google Scholar

33 Little, C., Bec, A., Moyle, B. D., Patterson, D. Innovative methods for heritage tourism experiences: creating windows into the past. Journal of Heritage Tourism, vol. 15, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1‒13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2018.1536709 Search in Google Scholar

34 Ivanova, B., Vassilev, T. A m ixed r eality a pproach t o visualizing cultural heritage artefacts: Mixed reality approach to cultural heritage, International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies ‘21: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, pp. 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472410.3472432 Search in Google Scholar

35 Heidentor [online, cited 20.05.2022]. https://engineeringandarchitecture.com/heidentor/ Search in Google Scholar

36 Colucci, E., De Ruvo, V., Lingua, A., Matrone, F., Rizzo, G. HBIM-GIS integration: From IFC to CityGML standard for damaged cultural heritage in a multiscale 3D GIS. Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 4, 2020, p. 1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041356 Search in Google Scholar