[
1. Zylinska, J. AI art: machine visions and warped dreams. London: Open Humanities Press, 2020. 178 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Wilson, E. O. Naturalist. Washington, D.C.: Shearwater Books, 1994. 380 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Krčmářová, J. E.O. Wilson’s concept of biophilia and the environmental movement in the USA. Klaudyán: Internet J Histor Geogr Environ History, 2009, vol. 6, no. 1–2, pp. 4–17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Chang, C.-c., Cheng, G. J. Y., Nghiem, T. P.L., Song, X. P., Oh, R. R. Y., Richards, D. R., Carrasco, L. R. Social media, nature, and life satisfaction: global evidence of the biophilia hypothesis. Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60902-w
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Hung, S.-H., Chang, C.-Y. U sing A I t o E xtract Biophilic Design Elements and Predict Health Benefits and Tradition Environmental Qi. The University of Auckland Conference contribution 2021. https://doi.org/10.17608/k6.auckland.13578209.v2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Zhong, W., Schröder, T., Bekkering, J. Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 11, no. 1, 2022, pp. 114–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Mollazadeh, M., Zhu, Y. Application of Virtual Environments for Biophilic Design: A Critical Review. Buildings, vol. 11, no. 4, 2021, 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11040148
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Wang, P.-C., Yu, C.-Y. Aesthetic experience as an essential factor to trigger positive environmental consciousness. Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 4, 2018, 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041098
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Sobel, D. Beyond Ecophobia: Reclaiming the Heart of Nature Education. Great Barrington, MA: Orion Society, 1996. 61 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Brown, K., Adger, W. N., Devine-Wright, P., Barr, S., Bousquet, F., Butler, C., Evans, L., Marshall, N., Quinn, T. Empathy, place and identity interactions for sustainability. Global Environmental Change, vol. 56, no. 6, 2019, pp. 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.03.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Riekstins, A. Teaching parametricism as a standard skill for architecture. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, vol. 42, no. 1, 2018, pp. 34–39. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2018.1476
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Williams, K. Form-Finding, Architecture and Mathematics. Nexus Network Journal, vol. 24, 2022, pp. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-021-00588-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Goldsmith, N. S. Shape Finding or Form Finding? Proceedings of the IASS-SLTE 2014 Symposium “Shells, Membranes and Spatial Structures: Footprints” 15 to 19 September 2014, Brasilia, Brazil [online, cited 10.05.2022]. https://ftlstudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04Form%20Finding%20vs%20Shape%20Making.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Elshanwany, H., El-sayad, Z., Nasser, H. S. Various classifications for architectural form finding process. The Egyptian International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Technology, vol. 32, 2020, pp. 32–42.10.21608/eijest.2020.47216.1022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Cetinic, E., She, J. Understanding and creating art with AI: Review and outlook. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), vol. 18, no. 2, 2022, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3475799
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Grba, D. Deep Else: A Critical Framework for AI Art. Digital, vol. 2, no. 1, 2022, pp. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital2010001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Mateas, M. Expressive AI: A hybrid art and science practice. Leonardo, vol. 34, no. 2, 2001, pp. 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1162/002409401750184717
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Tromble, M. Ask not what AI can do for art... but what art can do for AI. Artnodes, vol. 26, 2020, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i26.3368
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Hassine, T., Neeman, Z. The Zombification of Art History: How AI resurrects dead masters, and perpetuates historical biases. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, vol. 11, no. 2, 2019, pp. 28–35. https://doi.org/10.7559/citarj.v11i2.663
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Crowson, K., Biderman, S., Kornis, D., Stander, D., Hallahan, E., Castricato, L, Raff, E. VQGAN-CLIP: Open Domain Image Generation and Editing with Natural Language Guidance. In: Avidan, S., Brostow, G., Cissé, M., Farinella, G.M., Hassner, T. (eds). Computer Vision – ECCV 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13697. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19836-6_6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., Mador, M. Biophilic design: the theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2011. 432 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., Clancy, J. O. 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design. New York: Terrapin Bright Green LLC, 2014 [online, cited 10.05.2022]. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/report/14-patterns/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Kagan, S. Aesthetics of Sustainability: A Transdisciplinary Sensibility for Transformative Practices. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, vol. 2, 2011, pp. 65–73. https://doi.org/10.22545/2011/00014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Daugelaite, A., Dogan, H. A., Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I. Characterizing sustainability aesthetics of buildings and environments: methodological frame and pilot application to the hybrid environments. Landscape Architecture and Art, vol. 19, no. 19, 2021, pp. 61–72. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2021.19.06
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Salingaros, N. A. The biophilic healing index predicts effects of the built environment on our wellbeing. Journal of Biourbanism, vol. 8, no. 1, 2019, pp. 13–34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Mcgee, B. Biophilic Interior Design: The Creation and Testing of an Interior Design Specific Language. School of Human Ecology Faculty Presentations. Presentation 315, 2019 [online, cited 10.05.2022]. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ecology-facpres/315
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Viliūnas, G., Daugėlaitė, A., Gražulevičiūtė-Vileniškė, I. Integration of biophilic criteria into assessment of expression and design of sustainable architecture as healing environments. Conference: Human and nature safety 2022: selected papers, 2022, pp. 24–127.
]Search in Google Scholar