[
1. Bansal K, Gupta S, Nikhil V, Jaiswal S, Jain A, Aggarwal N. Effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of resin composite and enamel: an in vitro profilometric and scanning electron microscopy study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2019;9(3):154-158.10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_11_19665227931392178
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Lesage B, Milnar F, Wohlberg J. Achieving the epitome of composite art: creating natural too esthetics, texture and anatomy using appropriate preparation and layering techniques. Int. Dent S.A. 2009;11: 34–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Kameyama A, Nakazawa T, Haruyama A, Haruyama C, Hosaka M, Hirai Y. Influence of finishing/polishing procedures on the surface texture of two resin composites. J. Open Dent. 2008;2:56–60.10.2174/1874210600802010056258153919088883
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Yadav RD, Raisingani D, Jindal D, Mathur R. A comparative analysis of different finishing and polishing devices on nanofilled, microfilled, and hybrid composite: a scanning electron microscopy and profilometric study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(3):201-208.10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1364508600627843250
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Madhyastha PS, Hegde S, Srikant N, Kotian R, Iyer SS. Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Dental Research Journal. 2017;14(5):326.10.4103/1735-3327.215962565422729109747
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Babina K, Polyakova M, Sokhova I, Doroshina V, Arakelyan M, Novozhilova N. The effect of finishing and polishing sequences on the surface roughness of three different nanocomposites and composite/enamel and composite/cementum interfaces. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020;10(7):1339.10.3390/nano10071339740720932659992
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Guler AU, Guler E, Yucel AC, Ertas E. Effect of polishing procedures on color stability of resin composites. J. Appl. Oral Sc. 2009;17(2):108–112.10.1590/S1678-77572009000200007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Tosco V, Monterubbianesi R, Orilisi G et al. Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations. Stomatol. 2020;69(4):207-214.10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04310-331633320
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Scheibe KG, Almeida KG, Medeiros IS, Costa JF, Alves CM. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2009;17:21–26.10.1590/S1678-77572009000100005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Barbosa H, Zanata RL, Navarro MF, Nunes OB. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable resin composites. Braz.Dent. J. 2005;16:39–44.10.1590/S0103-64402005000100007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Sibel A, Yazici AR, Kilinc E, Antonson DE, Hardigan PC. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent. 2011;39(1):e9-16.10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.00621256180
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Nasoohi N, Hoorziad M, Tabatabaei SF. Effects of wet and dry finishing and polishing on surface roughness and microhardness of composite resins. J Dent (Tehran). 2017;14(2):69-75.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing. J Esthet Restor Dent.2007;19:265–275.10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00116.x17877626
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Kritzinger D, Brandt PD, De Wet FA. The effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of a nanocomposite and microhybrid composite. S Afr Dent J. 2017; 72(6):249-257.10.17159/2519-0105/2017/v72no6a1
]Search in Google Scholar
