Comparison of the cytotoxicity of 3D-printed aligners using different post-curing procedures: an in vitro study
, , , , , , et | 14 août 2023
Publié en ligne: 14 août 2023
Pages: 49 - 56
Reçu: 01 févr. 2023
Accepté: 01 juil. 2023
© 2023 Campobasso Alessandra et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Digital models imported into the software.Figure 2.
Digital design of the aligner.Figure 3.
Printing supports.Figure 4.
Printing process.Figure 5.
Final 3D-printed aligner.Differences among groups (P1, C+, P2) and MTT timings (7 and 14 d).
Source |
Type III sum of squares |
df |
Mean square |
F test |
P value |
Group |
7.374 |
2 |
3.687 |
166.341 |
<0.001*** |
MTT |
4.978 |
1 |
4.978 |
224.604 |
<0.001*** |
Group*MTT |
1.444 |
2 |
0.722 |
32.567 |
<0.001*** |
Descriptive and Inferential Statistics of Cell Viability, expressed in percentage (%)
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
Group |
Mean ± SD (%) |
Cytotoxicity |
Mean ± SD (%) |
Cytotoxicity |
P1 |
107.12 ± 17.47 Aa |
None |
106.74 ± 18.41 A |
None |
C+ |
100.00 ± 24.71 A |
/ |
100.00 ± 18.61 A |
/ |
P2 |
59.79 ± 10.06***B |
Moderate |
47.09 ± 20.62*** B |
Moderate |