Accès libre

Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using the anti-bacterial primer, Denteshield®

Craig Murphy

Craig Murphy

Private Practice of OrthodonticsNew Orleans, LA, USA
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig
, 
Xiaoming Xu

Xiaoming Xu

Department of Prosthodontics, LSUHSC School of DentistryNew Orleans, LA, USA
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Xu, Xiaoming
, 
Qingzhao Yu

Qingzhao Yu

Department of Biostatistics, LSUHSC School of Public HealthNew Orleans, LA, USA
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Yu, Qingzhao
, 
Paul Armbruster

Paul Armbruster

Department of Orthodontics, LSUHSC School of DentistryNew Orleans, LA, USA
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Armbruster, Paul
 et 
Richard Ballard

Richard Ballard

Department of Orthodontics, LSUHSC School of DentistryNew Orleans, LA, USA
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Ballard, Richard
  
14 févr. 2023
Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using the anti-bacterial primer, Denteshield®'s Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Télécharger la couverture
Publié en ligne: 14 févr. 2023
Pages: 49 - 54
Reçu: 01 juil. 2021
Accepté: 01 nov. 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2023-0009
Mots clés
© 2023 Craig Murphy et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Aim:

This study examined the bond strength associated with Denteshield® Primer as a replacement for a conventional, non-antimicrobial, orthodontic primer.

Materials/methods:

Sixty human premolar teeth were divided into three groups (n=20). Each group was assigned to receive either Denteshield®, Pro Seal® or Transbond XT TM primer. Light-cured Transbond XTTM adhesive resin was utilised to bond a bracket to each sample tooth following the application of the assigned primer. Ten samples from each group were tested for shear bond strength using a universal testing machine. The remaining 10 samples from each group underwent bracket debonding using a debonding plier. Applying an adhesive remnant index, each sample was scored under a microscope at 2.5× magnification. The data were analysed using One-way ANOVA, the Tukey post hoc test and the Kruskal–Wallis test.

Results:

The mean shear bond strength (MPa) of the three groups was: Denteshield® (33.18 ± 13.56), Pro Seal® (23.68 ± 12.04) and Transbond XTTM primer (26.19 ± 9.44). There was no significant difference in the shear bond strength across all three groups (p = 0.19). The adhesive remnant index results also showed no significant differences between the three groups (p = 0.278).

Conclusion:

Based on the shear bond strengths obtained in this study and the previously reported values necessary for clinical use, all three primers appear adequate for clinical use. (Aust Orthod J 2022; 39: 49 - 54. DOI: 10.2478/aoj-2023-0009)
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
1 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Médecine, Sciences médicales de base, Sciences médicales de base, autres
RSS Feed de la revue