This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ngan P, Hu AM, Fields HW. Treatment of Class III problems begins with differential diagnosis of anterior crossbites. Pediatr Dent 1997;19:386–95.NganPHuAMFieldsHW.Treatment of Class III problems begins with differential diagnosis of anterior crossbites. Pediatr Dent1997;19:386–95.Search in Google Scholar
McIntyre G. Treatment Planning in Class III Malocclusion. Dent Update 2004;31:13–20.McIntyreG.Treatment Planning in Class III Malocclusion. Dent Update2004;31:13–20.10.12968/denu.2004.31.1.1315000004Search in Google Scholar
Littlewood S, Mitchell L, Lewis B, Barber S, Jenkins F. An introduction to orthodontics, 5th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2019.LittlewoodSMitchellLLewisBBarberSJenkinsF.An introduction to orthodontics, 5th ed.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press;2019.Search in Google Scholar
Rabie AB, Wong RW, Min GU. Treatment in borderline Class III malocclusion: orthodontic camouflage (extraction) versus orthognathic surgery. Open Dent J 2008;2:38–48.RabieABWongRWMinGU.Treatment in borderline Class III malocclusion: orthodontic camouflage (extraction) versus orthognathic surgery. Open Dent J2008;2:38–48.10.2174/1874210600802010038258153619088881Search in Google Scholar
Schuster G, Lux CJ, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Children with Class III malocclusion: Development of multivariate statistical models to predict future need for orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 2003;73:136–45.SchusterGLuxCJStellzig-EisenhauerA.Children with Class III malocclusion: Development of multivariate statistical models to predict future need for orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod2003;73:136–45.Search in Google Scholar
Auconi P, Ottaviani E, Barelli E, Giuntini V, McNamara JA, Franchi L. Prognostic approach to Class III malocclusion through case-based reasoning. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24(Suppl 2):163–71.AuconiPOttavianiEBarelliEGiuntiniVMcNamaraJAFranchiL.Prognostic approach to Class III malocclusion through case-based reasoning. Orthod Craniofac Res.2021;24(Suppl 2):163–71.10.1111/ocr.1246633417750Search in Google Scholar
Perillo L, Auconi P, d’Apuzzo F, Grassia V, Scazzocchio M, Nucci L, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L. Machine learning in the prognostic appraisal of Class III growth. Semin Orthod. 2021;27:96–108.PerilloLAuconiPd’ApuzzoFGrassiaVScazzocchioMNucciLMcNamaraJAJrFranchiL.Machine learning in the prognostic appraisal of Class III growth. Semin Orthod.2021;27:96–108.10.1053/j.sodo.2021.05.006Search in Google Scholar
Zhou YH, Hägg U, Rabie AB. Concerns and motivations of skeletal Class III patients receiving orthodontic-surgical correction. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 2001;16:7–17.ZhouYHHäggURabieAB.Concerns and motivations of skeletal Class III patients receiving orthodontic-surgical correction. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg2001;16:7–17.Search in Google Scholar
Kim Y. Complications associated with orthognathic surgery. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;43:3.KimY.Complications associated with orthognathic surgery. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg2017;43:3.10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.1.3534297028280704Search in Google Scholar
Weaver N, Glover K, Major P, Varnhagen C, Grace M. Age limitation on provision of orthopedic therapy and orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:156–64.WeaverNGloverKMajorPVarnhagenCGraceM.Age limitation on provision of orthopedic therapy and orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1998;113:156–64.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70287-29484206Search in Google Scholar
Lee C, Park H, Seo B, Lee S. Modern trends in Class III orthognathic treatment: A time series analysis. Angle Orthod. 2016;87:269–78.LeeCParkHSeoBLeeS.Modern trends in Class III orthognathic treatment: A time series analysis. Angle Orthod.2016;87:269–78.10.2319/043016-349.1838437227513030Search in Google Scholar
Proffit WR, Ackerman JLGraber TM, Swain BF. Diagnosis and treatment planning. Current orthodontic concepts and techniques St. Louis: Mosby; 1982;3–100.ProffitWRAckermanJLGraberTMSwainBF.Diagnosis and treatment planning. Current orthodontic concepts and techniquesSt. Louis:Mosby1982;3–100.Search in Google Scholar
Kerr WJ, Miller S, Dawber JE. Class III malocclusion: surgery or orthodontics? Br J Orthod 1992;19:21–4.KerrWJMillerSDawberJE.Class III malocclusion: surgery or orthodontics?Br J Orthod1992;19:21–4.10.1179/bjo.19.1.211562575Search in Google Scholar
Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Lux CJ, Schuster G. Treatment decision in adult patients with Class III malocclusion: orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:27–37.Stellzig-EisenhauerALuxCJSchusterG.Treatment decision in adult patients with Class III malocclusion: orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery?Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2002;122:27–37.10.1067/mod.2002.12363212142894Search in Google Scholar
Eslami S, Faber J, Fateh A, Sheikholaemmeh F, Grassia V, Jamilian A. Treatment decision in adult patients with class III malocclusion: surgery versus orthodontics. Prog Orthod 2018;19:28.EslamiSFaberJFatehASheikholaemmehFGrassiaVJamilianA.Treatment decision in adult patients with class III malocclusion: surgery versus orthodontics. Prog Orthod2018;19:28.10.1186/s40510-018-0218-0607045130069814Search in Google Scholar
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–60.HigginsJPThompsonSGDeeksJJAltmanDG.Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ2003;327:557–60.10.1136/bmj.327.7414.55719285912958120Search in Google Scholar
McSherry PF. Class III malocclusions: the choice between orthodontics or surgery. J Ir Dent Assoc. 1997;43:13–9.McSherryPF.Class III malocclusions: the choice between orthodontics or surgery. J Ir Dent Assoc.1997;43:13–9.Search in Google Scholar
Troy BA, Shanker S, Fields HW, Vig K, Johnston W. Comparison of incisor inclination in patients with Class III malocclusion treated with orthognathic surgery or orthodontic camouflage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:146e1–9e1.TroyBAShankerSFieldsHWVigKJohnstonW.Comparison of incisor inclination in patients with Class III malocclusion treated with orthognathic surgery or orthodontic camouflage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2009;135:146e1–9e1.10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.01219201319Search in Google Scholar
Martinez P, Bellot-Arcís C, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes-Gallardo V. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthognathic surgery for class III deformity: comparative cephalometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;46:490–5.MartinezPBellot-ArcísCLlamasJMCibrianRGandiaJLParedes-GallardoV.Orthodontic camouflage versus orthognathic surgery for class III deformity: comparative cephalometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg2017;46:490–5.10.1016/j.ijom.2016.12.00128034574Search in Google Scholar
Georgalis K, Woods MG. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery. Aust Orthod J 2015;31:138–48.GeorgalisKWoodsMG.A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery. Aust Orthod J2015;31:138–48.10.21307/aoj-2020-148Search in Google Scholar
Benyahia H, Azaroual MF, Garcia C, Hamou E, Abouqal R, Zaoui F. Treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusions: orthognathic surgery or orthodontic camouflage? How to decide. Int Orthod 2011;9:196–209.BenyahiaHAzaroualMFGarciaCHamouEAbouqalRZaouiF.Treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusions: orthognathic surgery or orthodontic camouflage? How to decide. Int Orthod2011;9:196–209.10.1016/j.ortho.2011.03.00521511553Search in Google Scholar
Kochel J, Emmerich S, Meyer-Marcotty P, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. New model for surgical and nonsurgical therapy in adults with Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e165–e174.KochelJEmmerichSMeyer-MarcottyPStellzig-EisenhauerA.New model for surgical and nonsurgical therapy in adults with Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2011;139:e165–e174.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.02421300227Search in Google Scholar
Tseng YC, Pan CY, Chou ST, Liao CY, Lai ST, Chen CM, et al. Treatment of adult Class III malocclusions with orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery: receiver operating characteristic analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e485–e493.TsengYCPanCYChouSTLiaoCYLaiSTChenCMet al.Treatment of adult Class III malocclusions with orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery: receiver operating characteristic analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2011;139:e485–e493.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.12.01421536190Search in Google Scholar
Watanabe JH, Fitarelli F, de Freitas DS, Cançado RH, de Oliveira RC, de Oliveira RC, et al. Comparison of the facial profile attractiveness in Class III borderline patients after surgical or compensatory orthodontic treatment. J Clin Exp Dent 2020;12:e348–e353.WatanabeJHFitarelliFde FreitasDSCançadoRHde OliveiraRCde OliveiraRCet al.Comparison of the facial profile attractiveness in Class III borderline patients after surgical or compensatory orthodontic treatment. J Clin Exp Dent2020;12:e348–e353.10.4317/jced.56750719568232382384Search in Google Scholar
Fudalej P, Dragan M, Wedrychowska-Szulc B. Prediction of the outcome of orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusions—a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:190–7.FudalejPDraganMWedrychowska-SzulcB.Prediction of the outcome of orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusions—a systematic review. Eur J Orthod2011;33:190–7.10.1093/ejo/cjq05220651046Search in Google Scholar
Jacobson A. The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1975;67:125–38.JacobsonA.The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1975;67:125–38.10.1016/0002-9416(75)90065-21054214Search in Google Scholar
Chang HP. Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:117–22.ChangHP.Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1987;92:117–22.10.1016/0889-5406(87)90366-03475966Search in Google Scholar
Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 1983;84:1–28.HoldawayRA.A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod1983;84:1–28.10.1016/0002-9416(83)90144-66575614Search in Google Scholar
Wędrychowska-Szulc B, Syryńska M. Patient and parent motivation for orthodontic treatment—a questionnaire study. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:447–52.Wędrychowska-SzulcBSyryńskaM.Patient and parent motivation for orthodontic treatment—a questionnaire study. Eur J Orthod2010;32:447–52.10.1093/ejo/cjp13120008018Search in Google Scholar
Samsonyanová L, Broukal Z. A systematic review of individual motivational factors in orthodontic treatment: facial attractiveness as the main motivational factor in orthodontic treatment. Int J Dent 2014;2014:938274.SamsonyanováLBroukalZ.A systematic review of individual motivational factors in orthodontic treatment: facial attractiveness as the main motivational factor in orthodontic treatment. Int J Dent2014;2014:938274.10.1155/2014/938274405509424963296Search in Google Scholar
Cassidy DW Jr, Herbosa EG, Rotskoff KS, Johnston LE Jr. A comparison of surgery and orthodontics in “borderline” adults with Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:455–70.CassidyDWJrHerbosaEGRotskoffKSJohnstonLEJr. A comparison of surgery and orthodontics in “borderline” adults with Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1993;104:455–70.10.1016/0889-5406(93)70072-V8237898Search in Google Scholar
