This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 2003;73:301-6.Search in Google Scholar
El-Zanaty HM, El-Beialy AR, Abou El-Ezz AM, Attia KH, El-Bialy AR, Mostafa YA. Three-dimensional dental measurements: an alternative to plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:259-65.Search in Google Scholar
Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:19-25.Search in Google Scholar
Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 2004;74:298-303.Search in Google Scholar
Ryden H, Bjelkhagen H, Martensson B. Tooth position measurements on dental casts using holographic images. Am J Orthod 1982;81:310-3.Search in Google Scholar
Redmond WR, Redmond WJ, Redmond MJ. Clinical implications of digital orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:240-1.Search in Google Scholar
Takada K, Lowe AA, DeCou R. Operational performance of the Reflex Metrograph and its applicability to the three-dimensional analysis of dental casts. Am J Orthod 1983;83:195-9.Search in Google Scholar
Commer P, Bourauel C, Maier K, Jager A. Construction and testing of a computer-based intraoral laser scanner for determining tooth positions. Med Eng Phys 2000;22:625-35.Search in Google Scholar
Motohashi N, Kuroda T. A 3D computer-aided design system applied to diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:263-74.Search in Google Scholar
Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:508-13.Search in Google Scholar
Goonewardene RW, Goonewardene MS, Razza JM, Murray K. Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models. Aust Orthod J 2008;24:83-90.Search in Google Scholar
Joffe L. OrthoCAD: digital models for a digital era. J Orthod 2004;31:344-7.Search in Google Scholar
Kau CH, Littlefield J, Rainy N, Nguyen JT, Creed B. Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little’s Index. Angle Orthod 2010;80:435-9.Search in Google Scholar
Nur M, Kayipmaz S, Bayram M, Celikoglu M, Kilkis D, Sezgin OS. Conventional frontal radiographs compared with frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2012;82:579-84.Search in Google Scholar
Hunter WS, Priest WR. Errors and discrepancies in measurement of tooth size. J Dent Res 1960;39:405-14.Search in Google Scholar
Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983;83:382-90.Search in Google Scholar
Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM, Fischer JR. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod 2001;71:351-7.Search in Google Scholar
Proffit WR, Ackerman JL. Orthodontic diagnosis: the development of a problem list. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, eds. Contemporary Orthodontics. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000:165-70.Search in Google Scholar
Kapila S, Conley RS, Harrell WE, Jr. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:24-34.Search in Google Scholar
Dolekoglu S, Fisekcioglu E, Ilguy M, Ilguy D. The usage of digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography among Turkish dentists. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:379-84.Search in Google Scholar
Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Frazao DC, McNamara JA, Jr., Manzi FR. Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans. Angle Orthod 2011;81:26-35.Search in Google Scholar
Nguyen E, Boychuk D, Orellana M. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in predicting the diameter of unerupted teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:e59-66.Search in Google Scholar
Oktay H, Ulukaya E. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:307-12.Search in Google Scholar
Uysal T, Sari Z. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy and mesiodistal crown dimensions for a Turkish population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:226-30.Search in Google Scholar
Uysal T, Sari Z, Basciftci FA, Memili B. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy and malocclusion: is there a relation? Angle Orthod 2005;75:208-13.Search in Google Scholar
Al-Omari IK, Al-Bitar ZB, Hamdan AM. Tooth size discrepancies among Jordanian schoolchildren. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:527-31.Search in Google Scholar
Tarazona B, Llamas JM, Cibrián R, Gandía JL, Paredes V. Evaluation of the validity of the Bolton Index using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17:e878-83.Search in Google Scholar
Endo T, Uchikura K, Ishida K, Shundo I, Sakaeda K, Shimooka S. Thresholds for clinically significant tooth-size discrepancy. Angle Orthod 2009;79:740-6.Search in Google Scholar
Tarazona B, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. A comparison between dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those taken from a digital method. Eur J Orthod 2013;35:1-6.Search in Google Scholar
Lorenzoni DC, Bolognese AM, Garib DG, Guedes FR, Sant’anna EF. Cone-beam computed tomography and radiographs in dentistry: aspects related to radiation dose. Int J Dent doi:10.1155/2012/813768.Search in Google Scholar
