This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4 ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2007:402-7.Search in Google Scholar
Djeu G, Shelton C, Maganzini A. Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:292-8.Search in Google Scholar
Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Obrez A, Agran B. How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:27-35.Search in Google Scholar
Tuncay OC. The Invisalign System. London: Quintessence Publishing; 2006:112-113.Search in Google Scholar
Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B, Agran B, Viana G. Influence of attachments and interproximal reduction on the accuracy of canine rotation with Invisalign. A prospective clinical study. Angle Orthod 2008;78:682-7.Search in Google Scholar
Giancotti A, Greco M, Mampieri G. Extraction treatment using Invisalign Technique. Prog Orthod 2006;7:32-43.Search in Google Scholar
Boyd RL. Complex orthodontic treatment using a new protocol for the Invisalign appliance. J Clin Orthod 2007;41:525-47.Search in Google Scholar
Noar JH, Evans RD. Rare earth magnets in orthodontics: an overview. Br J Orthod 1999;26:29-37.Search in Google Scholar
Darendeliler MA, Darendeliler A, Mandurino M. Clinical application of magnets in orthodontics and biological implications: a review. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:431-42.Search in Google Scholar
Vardimon AD, Graber TM, Drescher D, Bourauel C. Rare earth magnets and impaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:494-512.Search in Google Scholar
Romaniuk K, Kruger BJ. Anatomy of the human skull, jaws, teeth and muscles of mastication. St. Lucia: Dept. of Oral Biology and Oral Surgery, University of Queensland; 1989:34-78.Search in Google Scholar
Boeckler AF, Morton D, Ehring C, Setz JM. Mechanical properties of magnetic attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants. J Prosthodont 2008;17:608-15.Search in Google Scholar
Darvell BW, Dias AP. Non-inverse-square force-distance law for long thin magnets. Dent Mater 2006;22:909-18.Search in Google Scholar
von Fraunhofer JA, Bonds PW, Johnson BE. Force generation by orthodontic samarium-cobalt magnets. Angle Orthod 1992;62:191-4.Search in Google Scholar
Bondemark L, Kurol J. Force-distance relation and properties of repelling Sm-Co5 magnets in orthodontic clinical use: an experimental model. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:228-31.Search in Google Scholar
Mancini GP, Noar JH, Evans RD. The physical characteristics of neodymium iron boron magnets for tooth extrusion. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:541-50.Search in Google Scholar
Quinn RS, Yoshikawa DK. A reassessment of force magnitude in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1985;88:252-60.Search in Google Scholar
Ren Y, Maltha JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Optimum force magnitude for orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic literature review. Angle Orthod 2003;73:86-92.Search in Google Scholar
Tanne K, Sakuda M, Burstone CJ. Three-dimensional finite element analysis for stress in the periodontal tissue by orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:499-505.Search in Google Scholar
Burstone CJ. The biophysics of bone remodelling during orthodontics - optimal force considerations In: Norton LA, Burstone CJ, ed. The biology of tooth movement. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1986: 321-33.Search in Google Scholar
Bondemark L, Kurol J. Proximal alveolar bone level after orthodontic treatment with magnets, superelastic coils and straight-wire appliances. Angle Orthod 1997;67:7-14.Search in Google Scholar
Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Root resorption after orthodontic treatment: Part 2. Literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:138-46.Search in Google Scholar
Chan E, Darendeliler MA. Physical properties of root cementum: Part 5. Volumetric analysis of root resorption craters after application of light and heavy orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:186-95.Search in Google Scholar
Blechman AM. Magnetic force systems in orthodontics. Clinical results of a pilot study. Am J Orthod 1985;87:201-10.Search in Google Scholar
Blechman AM, Smiley H. Magnetic force in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1978;74:435-43.Search in Google Scholar
Okuno O, Ishikawa S, Imuro FT, Kinouchi Y, Yamada Y, Nakano T, et al. Development of sealed cup yoke type dental magnetic attachment. Dent Mater J 1991;10:172-84.Search in Google Scholar
Tegawa YY. Influences on attractive force in different clinical use of a cup yoke magnetic attachment. J Jpn Soc Mag Dent 1996;5:31-7.Search in Google Scholar
Dias AP, Darvell BW. Physics, use and design of dental magnets. J Jpn Soc Mag Dent 1998;7:12-17.Search in Google Scholar
Barbagallo LJ, Shen G, Jones AS, Swain MV, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA. A novel pressure film approach for determining the force imparted by clear removable thermoplastic appliances. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:335-41.Search in Google Scholar
Bondemark L, Kurol J, Wennberg A. Biocompatibility of new, clinically used, and recycled orthodontic samarium-cobalt magnets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:568-74.Search in Google Scholar
Kitsugi A, Okuno O, Nakano T, Hamanaka H, Kuroda T. The corrosion behavior of Nd2Fe14B and SmCo5 magnets. Dent Mater J 1992;11:119-29.Search in Google Scholar
Drescher D, Bourauel C, Thier M. Application of the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS) in orthodontics. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:169-78.Search in Google Scholar
Vardimon AD, Bourauel C, Drescher D, Schmuth GP. 3-D force and moment analysis of repulsive magnetic appliances to correct dentofacial vertical excess. J Dent Res 1994;73:67-74.Search in Google Scholar
Sandler JP. An attractive solution to unerupted teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:489-93.Search in Google Scholar
