This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Rinchuse DJ, Miles PG. Self-ligating brackets: present and future. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:216-22.Search in Google Scholar
Pellegrini P, Sauerwein R, Finlayson T, McLeod J, Covell Jr DA, Maier T, Machida CA. Plaque retention by self-ligating vs elastomeric orthodontic brackets: quantitative comparison of oral bacteria and detection with adenosine triphosphate-driven bioluminescence. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:426.e1-9.Search in Google Scholar
Turnbull NR, Birnie DJ. Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:395-9.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Damon P, Jakobsen JR. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998:114:80-7.Search in Google Scholar
Nemeth BR, Wiltshire WA, Lavelle CL. Shear/peel bond strength of orthodontic attachments to moist and dry enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:396-401.Search in Google Scholar
MacColl GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC, Yamin C. The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:276-81.Search in Google Scholar
Wang WN, Li CH, Chou TH, Wang DD, Lin LH, Lin CT. Bond strength of various bracket base designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:65-70.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Soliman MM, Oonsombat C, Laffoon JF, Ajlouni R. The effect of variation in mesh-base design on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2004;74:400-4.Search in Google Scholar
Sharma-Sayal SK, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV, Titley KC. The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:74-82.Search in Google Scholar
Smith NR, Reynolds IR. A comparison of three bracket bases: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod 1991;18:29-35.Search in Google Scholar
Cucu M, Driessen CH, Ferreira PD. The influence of orthodontic bracket base diameter and mesh size on bond strength. SADJ 2002;57:16-20.Search in Google Scholar
Knox J, Hubsch P, Jones ML, Middleton J. The influence of bracket base design on the strength of the bracket-cement interface. J Orthod 2000;27:249-54.Search in Google Scholar
Cal-Neto JP, Quintão CA, Almeida MA, Miguel JA. Bond failure rates with a self-etching primer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:782-6.Search in Google Scholar
Mavropoulos A, Karamouzos A, Kolokithas G, Athanasiou AE. In vivo evaluation of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial. J Orthod 2003;30:139-47.Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien KD, Read MJ, Sandison RJ, Roberts CT. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: an in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:348-51.Search in Google Scholar
Aljubouri YD, Millett DT, Gilmour WH. Six and 12 months’ evaluation of a self-etching primer versus two-stage etch and prime for orthodontic bonding: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:565-71.Search in Google Scholar
Elekdag-Turk S, Cakmak F, Isci D, Turk T. 12-month self-ligating bracket failure rate with a self-etching primer. Angle Orthod 2008;78:1095-100.Search in Google Scholar
Maijer R, Smith DC. Variables influencing the bond strength of metal orthodontic bracket bases. Am J Orthod 1981;79:20-34.Search in Google Scholar
