This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Johnson WT, Hembree JH, Weber FN. Shear strength of orthodontic direct-bonding adhesion. AM J Orthod 1976; 70:559–66.Search in Google Scholar
Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171–8.Search in Google Scholar
Keizer S, Ten Cate JM, Arends J. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod 1976;69:318–27.Search in Google Scholar
King L, Smith RT, Wendt SL, Behrents RG. Bond strengths of lingual orthodontic brackets bonded with light-cured composite resins cured by transillumination. Am J Orthod 1987;91:312–5.Search in Google Scholar
Rock WB. The use of ultra-violet radiation in dentistry. Br Dent J 1974;136:455–60.Search in Google Scholar
Douglas WH, Craig RG, Chen CJ. A new composite restorative based on a hydrophobic matrix. J Dent Res 1979;58: 1981–6.Search in Google Scholar
Zachrisson BU, Buyukyilmaz T. Bonding in Orthodontics. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KW. 4th ed. Orthodontics current principles and techniques. St. Louis: Mosby, 2007:594.Search in Google Scholar
Oesterle LJ, Messersmith ML, Devine SM, Ness CF. Light and setting times of visible-light-cured orthodontic adhesives. J Clin Orthod 1995;29:31–6.Search in Google Scholar
Tavas A, Watts DC. Bonding of orthodontic brackets by transillumination of a light activated composite: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod 1979;6:207–8.Search in Google Scholar
Read MJF. Indirect bonding using a visible light cured adhesive. Br J Orthod 1987;14:137–41.Search in Google Scholar
Joseph VP, Rossouw E. The shear bond strength of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically light-activated composite resins. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:121–5.Search in Google Scholar
Ghafari J. Problems associated with ceramic brackets suggest limited use to selected teeth. Angle Orthod 1992;62: 145–52.Search in Google Scholar
Haydar B, Sarikaya S, Cehreli ZC. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets. Angle Orthod 1999;69:457–62.Search in Google Scholar
Hocevar RA, Vincent HF. Indirect versus direct bonding: bond strength and failure location. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:367–71.Search in Google Scholar
Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid etch pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333–40.Search in Google Scholar
Gwinnett AJ. A comparison of shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:346–8.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Olsen ME, VonWald L, Jakobsen JR. Comparision of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:86–92.Search in Google Scholar
MacColl GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC, Yamin C. the relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foilmesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113: 276–81.Search in Google Scholar
Retief DH. Failure at the dental adhesive-etched enamel interface. J Oral Rehabil 1974;1:265–84.Search in Google Scholar
Bowen RL, Rodriguez MS. Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1962;64:378–87.Search in Google Scholar
Uzel A, Buyukyilmaz T, Kayaligolu M, Uzel I. Temperature rise during orthodontic bonding with various light-curing units: an in vitro study. Angle Orthod 2006;76:330.Search in Google Scholar
