<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>Two female patients, JH aged 13 years 5 months and CN, aged 13 years 10 months, presented at the Sydney University Orthodontic Clinic, Australia. Patient JH complained that her lower teeth were “too far back behind her top teeth”. She was treated using the Speed Appliance. Patient CN complained that her teeth were “crooked”. The main point of interest of her case is the mechanics used following the extraction of her four first molar teeth. Both patients were keen to improve their appearance.</p>
</abstract>

Two female patients, JH aged 13 years 5 months and CN, aged 13 years 10 months, presented at the Sydney University Orthodontic Clinic, Australia. Patient JH complained that her lower teeth were “too far back behind her top teeth”. She was treated using the Speed Appliance. Patient CN complained that her teeth were “crooked”. The main point of interest of her case is the mechanics used following the extraction of her four first molar teeth. Both patients were keen to improve their appearance.

Varying treatments of Class II malocclusions: Two case reports

Postgraduate Student, Discipline of Orthodontics

Australasian Orthodontic Journal

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

{"article-title":"Varying treatments of Class II malocclusions: Two case reports"}

Two female patients, JH aged 13 years 5 months and CN, aged 13 years 10 months, presented at the Sydney University Orthodontic Clinic, Australia. Patient JH...

Varying treatments of Class II malocclusions: Two case reports

Publié en ligne: 15 déc. 2023

Pages: 103 - 114

Reçu: 01 avr. 2001

Accepté: 01 avr. 2001

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2001-0014

© 2001 Sameh Malek et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.