This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Pancherz H. Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance: a cephalo-metric investigation. Am J Orthod 1979; 76: 423–42.Search in Google Scholar
Vargervik K, Harvold EP. Response to activitor treatment in Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 242–51.Search in Google Scholar
Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of bass, bionator and twin-block appliances. Part I: the hard tissue. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20: 501–16.Search in Google Scholar
Williams S, Melson B. Condylar development and mandibular rotation and displacement during activitor treatment: an implant study. Am J Orthod 1982; 81: 322–6.Search in Google Scholar
Birkebaek L, Melsen B, Terp S. A laminagraphic study of the alterations in the temporo-mandibular joint following activitor treatment. Eur J Orthod 1984; 6: 257–66.Search in Google Scholar
Woodside DG. Do functional appliances have orthopedic effects? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 113: 11–14.Search in Google Scholar
Paulsen HU, Karle A, Bakke M, Herskind A. CT-scanning and radiographic analysis of temporo-mandibular joints and cephalometric analysis in a case of Herbst treatment in late puberty. Eur J Orthod 1995; 17: 165–75.Search in Google Scholar
Pancherz H. Dentofacial orthopedics or orthogathic surgery: is it a matter of age? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000; 117: 571–4.Search in Google Scholar
Tulloch JFC, Medland W, Tuncay OC. Method used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 98: 340–7.Search in Google Scholar
Isaacson KG, Reed RT, Stephens CD, eds. Functional orthodontic appliances. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991: 102–6.Search in Google Scholar
Thilander B, Rygh P, Reitan K. Tissue reactions in Orthodontics. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall JR, eds. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 3rd edn. St. Louis: Mosby, 2000: 117–92.Search in Google Scholar
Dermaut LR, Aelbers CMF. Orthopedics in orthodontics: fiction or reality. Part II: a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996; 110: 667–71.Search in Google Scholar
Voudouris JC, Kuftinec MM. Improved clinical use of twin-block and Herbst as a result of radiating viscoelastic tissue forces on the condylar and fossa in treatment and long-term retention: growth relativity. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000; 117: 247–66.Search in Google Scholar
Bosanquet AG, Goss AN. The sheep as a model for temporo-mandibular joint surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 16: 600–3.Search in Google Scholar
Charlier JP, Petrovic A, Herrmann-Stutzmann J. Effects of mandibular hyperpropulsion on the prechondroblastic zone of young rat condyle. Am J Orthod 1969; 55: 71–4.Search in Google Scholar
McNamara JA Jr, Carlson DS. Quantitative analysis of temporo-mandibular joint adaptations to protrusive function. Am J Orthod 1979; 76: 593–611.Search in Google Scholar
Hinton RJ, McNamara JA Jr. Temporal bone adaptations in response to protrusive function in juvenile and young adult rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Eur J Orthod 1984; 6: 155–74.Search in Google Scholar
Kantomaa T. Effect of increased posterior displacement of the glenoid fossa on mandibular growth: a methodological study on the rabbit. Eur J Orthod 1984; 6: 15–24.Search in Google Scholar
Ma B, Sampson W, Fazzalari N, Wilson D, Wiebkin O. Experimental mandibular forward displacement in sheep. Arch Oral Biology. In press.Search in Google Scholar
Suzuki S. Histomorphometric study on growing condyle of rat. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 1986; 33: 23–34.Search in Google Scholar
Pastoureau P, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD. Serum osteocalcin (bone gla-protein), an index of bone growth in lambs. Comparison with age-related histomorphometric changes. Bone 1991; 12: 143–9.Search in Google Scholar
Kantomaa T, Pirttiniemi P. Differences in biological response of the mandibular condyle to forward traction or opening of the mandible. Acta Odontol Scand 1996; 54: 138–44.Search in Google Scholar
Hansson LI. Daily growth in length of diaphysis measured by oxytetracycline in rabbit normally and after medullary plugging. Acta Orthop Scand 1967; 101 (Suppl): 34–84.Search in Google Scholar
Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological studies. New York: Interscience Publications, 1940.Search in Google Scholar
Eveleth PB, Tanner JM. International Biological Programme 8. Worldwide variation in human growth. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1976: 222–40.Search in Google Scholar
Edey TN, ed. A course manual in tropical sheep and goat production. Canberra: Australian Universities’ International Development Program, 1983: 88–91.Search in Google Scholar
Bjork A. Variations in the growth pattern of human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res 1963; 42: 400–11.Search in Google Scholar
Buschang PH, Santos-Pinto A. Demirjian A. Incremental growth charts for condylar growth between 6 and 16 years of age. Eur J Orthod 1999; 21: 167–73.Search in Google Scholar
Graber TM. Functional appliances. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall JR, eds. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 3rd edn. St. Louis: Mosby, 2000: 473–520.Search in Google Scholar
Aelbers CMF, Dermaut LR. Orthopedics in orthodontics: Part I, fiction or reality—a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 513–19.Search in Google Scholar
