This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Shelton CE, Cisneros GJ, Nelson SE, Watkins P. Decreased treatment time due to changes in technique and practice philosophy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthap 1994; 106: 654–57.Search in Google Scholar
Vig PS, Weintraub JA, Brown C, Kowalski VC. The duration of orthodontic treatment with and without extractions: A pilot study of fine selected practices. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 97: 45–51.Search in Google Scholar
Fink DF, Smith RJ. The duration of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 102: 45–51.Search in Google Scholar
Alger DW. Appointment frequency versus treatment time. Am J OrthodDentofac Orthop 1988; 94: 436–439.Search in Google Scholar
Cobb III NW, Kula KS, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Efficiency of multi-strand steel, super-elastic Ni-Ti and ion-implanted Ni-Ti archwires for initial alignment. Clin Orth Res 1998; 1: 12–19.Search in Google Scholar
Kusy, RP, Whitley, JQ. Influence of archwire and bracket dimensions on sliding mechanics: Derivations and determinations of the critical contact angles for binding. Eur J Ortho 1999; 199–208.Search in Google Scholar
Richmond S, O’Brien K, Buchanan I, Burden D. An introduction to occlusal indices. Manchester: Mandent Press, 1994: 15–26.Search in Google Scholar
Phillips DS. Basic statistics for health science students. Friedman Press: New York, 1978.Search in Google Scholar
Proffit WR. Contemporary orthodontics. 2nd ed. CV Mosby: St. Louis, 1993.Search in Google Scholar
Peterson L, Spencer R, Andreasen G. A comparison of friction resistance for Nitinol and stainless steel wire in Edgewire brackets. Quintessence Int, 1982: 563–571.Search in Google Scholar
