This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Plunkett DJ. The provision of orthodontic treatment: Some ethical considerations. NZ Dent J 1997 93: 17–20.Search in Google Scholar
Shaw WC, Gabe MJ, Jones BM. The expectations of orthodontic patients in South Wales and St Louis, Missouri. Br J Orthod 1979; 6: 203–5.Search in Google Scholar
Gosney MBE. An investigation into some of the factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1986; 13: 87–94.Search in Google Scholar
Tulloch JFC, Shaw WC, Underhill C, Smith A, Jones G, Jones M. A comparison of attitudes toward orthodontic treatment in British and American communities. Am J Orthod 1984; 85: 253–9.Search in Google Scholar
Secord PF, Backman CW. Malocclusion and psychological factors. J Am Dent Assoc 1959; 59: 931–8.Search in Google Scholar
Shaw WC. The influence of children’s dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 1981; 79: 399–415.Search in Google Scholar
Kerosuo H, Hausen H, Laine T, Shaw WC. The influence of incisal malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. Eur J Orthod 1995; 17: 505–12.Search in Google Scholar
Jenny J, Proshek J M. Visibility and prestige of occupations and the importance of dental appearance. J Can Dent Assoc 1986; 52: 987–9.Search in Google Scholar
Sigall H, Ostrove N. Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgement. J Pers Soc Psychol 1975; 31: 410–14.Search in Google Scholar
Dipboye RL, Fromkin HL, Wiback K. Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant surveys. J Appl Psychol 1975; 60: 39–43.Search in Google Scholar
Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI: The Dental Aesthetic Index. Iowa City: University of Iowa, 1986: 95–103.Search in Google Scholar
Cons NC, Jenny J. Comparing perceptions of dental aesthetics in the USA with those in eleven ethnic groups. Int Dent J 1994; 44: 489–94.Search in Google Scholar
Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ, Freer TJ, Eisman D. Perceptions of occlusal conditions in Australia, the German Democratic Republic and the United States of America. Int Dent J 1983; 33: 200–6.Search in Google Scholar
Keay PA, Freer TJ, Basford KE. Orthodontic treatment need and the Dental Aesthetic Index. Aust Orthod J 1993; 13: 4–7 .Search in Google Scholar
World Health Organisation. International collaborative study of oral health outcomes (ICSII), Document 2: otal data collection instrument and examination criteria. Geneva: WHO, 1989: 13–27.Search in Google Scholar
World Health Organisation. Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods. Geneva: WHO, 4th edn (In press). Cited by Jenny J and Cons NC (1996).Search in Google Scholar
Crowther P, Harkness M, Herbison P. Orthodontic treatment need in 10-year-old Dunedin schoolchildren. NZ Dent J 1997; 93: 72–8.Search in Google Scholar
Jenny J, Cons NC. Establishing malocclusion severity levels on the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) scale. Aust Dent J 1996; 41: 43–6.Search in Google Scholar
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; Feb 8: 307-10.Search in Google Scholar
Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing two methods of clinical measurement: a personal history. Int J Epidemiol 1995; 24: S7–14.Search in Google Scholar
Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of treatment priority. EurJ Orthod 1989; 11: 309–20.Search in Google Scholar
Otuyemi OD, Jones SP Methods of assessing and grading malocclusion: a review. Aust Orthod J 1995; 14: 21–7.Search in Google Scholar
Estioko LJ, Wright FAC, Morgan MV. Orthodontic treatment need of secondary schoolchildren in Heidelberg, Victoria: an epidemiological study using the Dental Aesthetic Index. Community Dent Health 1994; 11: 147–51.Search in Google Scholar
Summers CJ. Some effects of developmental changes on the indices of malocclusion. J Public Health Dent 1966; 26: 212–20.Search in Google Scholar
McLain JB, Proffit WR. Oral health status in the United States: Prevalence of Malocclusion. J Dent Educ 1985; 49: 386–96.Search in Google Scholar
Tarvit DJ, Freer TJ. Assessing malocclusion: The time factor. Br J Orthod 1998; 25: 31–4.Search in Google Scholar
Ansai T, Miyazaki H, Katoh Y, et al. Prevalence of malocclusion in high school students in Japan according to the Dental Aesthetic Index. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21: 303–5.Search in Google Scholar
Jenny J, Cons NC, Kohout FJ, Jakobsen J. Predicting handicapping malocclusion using the Dental Aesthetic Index. Int Dent J 1993; 43: 128–32.Search in Google Scholar
