[
Bishara SE, Trulove TS. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part II. Findings and clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 98: 263-273.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Britton JC, Mclnnes P, Weinberg R, et al. Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 98: 348-353.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chaconas SJ, Caputo AA, Niu GS. Bond strength of ceramic brackets with various bonding agents. Angle Orthodontist 1991; 61: 35-41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cooper RB, Goss M, Hamula W. Direct bonding with light-cured adhesive precoated brackets. J Clin Orthod 1992; 26: 477-479.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eliades T, Viazis AD, Eliades G. Bonding of ceramic brackets to enamel: morphologic and structural considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991; 99: 369-375.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evans LB, Powers JM. Factors affecting in vitro bond strengths of no-mix orthodontic cements. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 508-512.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forsberg C-M, Hagberg C. Shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets with chemical or mechanical retention. Brit J Orthod 1992; 19: 183-189.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ghafari J, Skanchy TL, Mante F. Shear bond strength of two ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1992; 26: 491-493.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gwinnett AJ. A comparison of shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 93: 346-348.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harris AMP, Joseph VP, Rossouw E. Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic resins to ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1990; 24: 725-728.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lew KKK, Chew CL, Lee KW. A comparison of shear bond strengths between new and recycled ceramic brackets. Eur J Orthod 1991; 13: 306-310.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mackay F. The effect of adhesive type and thickness on bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Brit J Orthod 1992; 19: 35-39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mendenhall W. Introduction to probability and statistics. 6th edn. Boston: Duxbury Press, 1983: 490-524.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Odegaard J. Debonding ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1989; 23: 632-635.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Odegaard J, Segner D. Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 94: 201-206.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Odegaard J, Segner D. The use of visible light-curing composites in bonding 1 _ ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac — Orthop 1990; 97: 188-193.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ostertag AJ, Dhuru VB, Ferguson DJ et al. Shear, torsional, and tensile bond strengths of ceramic brackets using three adhesive filler concentrations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991; 100: 251-258.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Brit J Orthod 1975; 2: 171-178.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swartz ML. Ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1988; 22: 82-88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC et al. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 1989; 17: 61-67.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Viazis AD, Cavanaugh G, Bevis RR. Bond strength of ceramic brackets under shear stress: an in vitro report. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 98: 214-221.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Winchester LJ. Bond strengths of five different ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 1991; 13: 293-305.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Winchester LJ. A comparison between the old Transcend and the new Transcend Series 2000 bracket. Brit J Orthod 1992; 19: 109-116.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yamada T, Smith DC, Maijer R. Tensile and shear bond strengths of orthodontic direct bonding adhesives. Dent Mater 1988; 4: 243-250.
]Search in Google Scholar
