[
AOAC International (2000). Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed. Association of official analytical chemists, Arlington, VA, USA, 2200 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arriola K.G., Oliveira A.S., Ma Z.X., Lean I.J., Giurcanu M.C., Adesogan A.T. (2017). A meta-analysis on the effect of dietary application of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on the performance of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 100: 4513–4527.10.3168/jds.2016-12103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernard J.K., Tao S. (2015). Short communication: Production response of lactating dairy cows to brachytic forage sorghum silage compared with corn silage from first or second harvest. J. Dairy Sci., 98: 8994–9000.10.3168/jds.2015-9716
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Casali A.O., Detmann E., Valadares Filho S.C., Pereira J.C., Henriques L.T., Freitas S.G., Paulino M.F. (2008). Influence of incubation time and particles size on indigestible compounds contents in cattle feeds and feces obtained by in situ procedures. Rev. Bras. Zootec., 37: 335–342.10.1590/S1516-35982008000200021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Danner H., Holzer M., Mayrhuber E., Braun R. (2003). Acetic acid increases stability of silage under aerobic conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 69: 562–567.10.1128/AEM.69.1.562-567.2003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dehghani M.R., Weisbjerg M.R., Hvelplund T., Kristensen N.B. (2012). Effect of enzyme addition to forage at ensiling on silage chemical composition and NDF degradation characteristics. Livest. Sci., 150: 51–58.10.1016/j.livsci.2012.07.031
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Del Valle T.A., Antonio G., Zenatti T.F., Campana M., Zilio E.M.C., Ghizzi L.G., Gandra J.R., Osório J.A.C., de Morais J.P.G. (2019). Effects of xylanase on the fermentation profile and chemical composition of sugarcane silage. J. Agric. Sci., 156: 1123–1129.10.1017/S0021859618001090
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Drews M., Larsen M.A.D., Balderrama J.G.P. (2020). Projected water usage and land-use-change emissions from biomass production (2015–2050). Energy Strategy Rev., 29: 100487.10.1016/j.esr.2020.100487
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fernandes T., Paula E.M., Sultana H., Ferraretto L.F. (2020). Short communication: Influence of sorghum cultivar, ensiling storage length, and microbial inoculation on fermentation profile, N fractions, ruminal in situ starch disappearance and aerobic stability of whole-plant sorghum silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 266: 114535.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114535
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gorosito A.R., Russell J.B., Van Soest P.J. (1985). Effect of carbon-4 and carbon-5 volatile fatty acids on digestion of plant cell wall in vitro. J. Dairy Sci., 68: 840–847.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)80901-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holden L.A. (1999). Comparison of methods of in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds. J. Dairy Sci., 82: 1791–1794.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75409-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jobim C.C., Nussio L.G., Reis R.A., Schmidt P. (2007). Methodological advances in evaluation of preserved forage quality. Ver. Bras. Zootec., 36: 101–119.10.1590/S1516-35982007001000013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kung Jr. L. (2018). Silage fermentation and additives. Arch. Latinoam. Prod. Anim., 26: 3–4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kung Jr. L., Muck R.E. (2015). Silage additives: Where are we going? Proc. XVII International Silage Conference, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil, pp. 72–81.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kung Jr. L., Shaver R.D., Grant R.J., Schmidt R.J. (2018). Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. J. Dairy Sci., 101: 4020–4033.10.3168/jds.2017-13909
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu Q.H., Li X.Y., Desta S.T., Zhang J.G., Shao T. (2016). Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum and fibrolytic enzyme on the fermentation quality and in vitro digestibility of total mixed rations silage including rape straw. J. Integr. Agric., 15: 2087–2096.10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61233-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maulfair D.D., Fustini M., Heinrichs A.J. (2011). Effect of varying total mixed ration particle size on rumen digesta and fecal particle size and digestibility in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 94: 3527–3536.10.3168/jds.2010-3718
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCary C.L., Vyas D., Faciola A.P., Ferraretto L.F. (2020). Graduate Student Literature Review: Current perspectives on whole-plant sorghum silage production and utilization by lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 103: 5783–5790.10.3168/jds.2019-18122
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McDonald P., Henderson A.R., Heron S.J.E. (1991). The biochemistry of silage, 2nd ed. Marlow, UK, Chalcomb Publications, 207 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McDougall E.I. (1948). Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep’s saliva. Biochem. J., 43: 99–109.10.1042/bj0430099
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miron J., Zuckerman E., Sadeh D., Adin G., Nikbachat M., Yosef E., Ben-Ghedalia D., Carmi A., Kipnis T., Solomon R. (2005). Yield, composition and in vitro digestibility of new forage sorghum varieties and their ensilage characteristics. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 120: 17–32.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.01.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miura H., Horiguchi M., Matsumoto T. (1980). Nutritional interdependence among rumen bacteria, Bacteroides amylphilius, Megasphaera elsdenii, and Ruminococcus albus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 40: 294–300.10.1128/aem.40.2.294-300.1980
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muck R.E. (2010). Silage microbiology and its control through additives. Rev. Bras. Zootec., 39: 183–191.10.1590/S1516-35982010001300021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muck R.E., Nadeau E.M.G., McAllister T.A., Contreras-Govea F.E., Santos M.C., Kung Jr. L. (2018). Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives. J. Dairy Sci., 101: 3980–4000.10.3168/jds.2017-13839
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pryce J.D.A. (1969). A modification of the Barker-Summerson method for the determination of lactic acid. Analyst, 94: 1151–1152.10.1039/an9699401151
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roby M.C., Salas Fernandez M.G., Heaton E.A., Miguez F.E., Van-Loocke A. (2017). Biomass sorghum and maize have similar water-use-efficiency under non-drought conditions in the rain-fed Midwest U.S. Agricult. Forest Meteorol., 247: 434–444.10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.08.019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Savoie P., Jofriet J.C. (2003). Silage storage. In: Silage science and technology (agronomy series No. 42), Buxton D.R., Muck R.E., Harrison H.J. (eds). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI., pp. 405–467.10.2134/agronmonogr42.c9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saylor B.A., Fernandes T., Sultana H., Gallo A., Ferraretto L.F. (2020). Influence of microbial inoculation and length of storage on fermentation profile, N fractions, and ruminal in situ starch disappearance of whole-plant corn silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 267: 114557.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114557
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tilley J.M.A., Terry R.A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass Forage Sci., 18: 104–111.10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3583–3597.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang Y., McAllister T.A. (2002). Rumen microbes, enzymes and feed digestion – a review. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 15: 1659–1676.10.5713/ajas.2002.1659
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yang C.M.J. (2002). Response of forage fiber degradation by ruminal microorganisms to branched-chain volatile fatty acids, amino acids, and dipeptides. J. Dairy Sci., 85: 1183–1190.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74181-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yang Y., Ferreira G., Corl B.A., Campbell B.T. (2019). Production performance, nutrient digestibility, and milk fatty acid profile of lactating dairy cows fed corn silage- or sorghum silage-based diets with and without xylanase supplementation. J. Dairy Sci., 102: 2266–2274.10.3168/jds.2018-15801
]Search in Google Scholar
