[Angel M.A., Gil M.A., Cuello C., Sanzhez-Osorio J., Gomis J., Parrilla I., Vila J., Colina I., Diaz M., Reixach J., Vazquez J.L., Vazquez J.M., Roca J., Martinez E.A.(2014). An earlier uterine environment favors the in vivo development of fresh pig morulae and blastocysts transferred by a nonsurgical deep-uterine method. J. Reprod. Dev., 60: 371–376.10.1262/jrd.2014-022]Search in Google Scholar
[Aranaz I., Mengíbar M., Harris R., Paños I., Miralles B., Acosta N., Galed G., Heras A.(2009). Functional characterization of chitin and chitosan. Curr. Chem. Biol., 3: 203–230.10.2174/2212796810903020203]Search in Google Scholar
[Barash A., Dekel N., Fieldust S., Segal I., Schechtman E., Granot I.(2003). Local injury to the endometrium doubles the incidence of successful pregnancies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril., 79: 1317–1322.10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00345-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Betts D.H., Madan P.(2008). Permanent embryo arrest: molecular and cellular concepts. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 14: 445–453.10.1093/molehr/gan035]Search in Google Scholar
[Blazewicz S., Marciniak J.(2016). Biomaterial T.4. PAN, AOW Exit, p. 368–394.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bourdon M., Santulli P., Maignien C., Gayet V., Pocate-Cheriet K., Marcellin L., Chapron C.(2018). The deferred embryo transfer strategy improves cumulative pregnancy rates in endometriosis-related infertility: A retrospective matched cohort study. PLoS One, 13:e0194800.10.1371/journal.pone.0194800]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen Y.N., Dai J.J., Wu C.F., Zhang S.S., Sun L.W., Zhang D.F.(2018). Apoptosis and developmental capacity of vitrified parthenogenetic pig blastocysts. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 198: 137–144.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.09.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Conto E., Schuster A.K., Genro V.K., Chapon R., Silva D.S.D., Cunha-Filho J.S.(2017). A prospective study comparing two embryo-transfer soft catheters. JBRA Assist. Reprod., 21: 70–72.10.5935/1518-0557.20170018]Search in Google Scholar
[Cozzolino M., Vitagliano A., Di Giovanni M.V., LaganàL.A., Vitale S.G., Blaganje M., Drusany StaričK., Borut K., Patrelli T.S., Noventa M.(2018). Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: summary of the evidence and new perspectives. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Biomed. Online, 36: 524–542.10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.01.015]Search in Google Scholar
[ESHRE(2015). Guideline of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories ESHRE, pp. 1–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fonseca J.F., Souza-Fabjan J.M., Oliveira M.E., Leite C.R., Nascimento-Penido P.M., Brandão F.Z., Lehloenya K.C.(2016). Nonsurgical embryo recovery and transfer in sheep and goats. Theriogenology, 86: 144–151.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.025]Search in Google Scholar
[Galvin J.M., Killian D.B., Stewart A.N.W.(1994). A procedure for successful nonsurgical embryo transfer in swine. Theriogenology, 41: 1279–1289.10.1016/0093-691X(94)90486-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Gupta M.K., Uhm S.J., Lee H.H.T.(2007). Differential but beneficial effect of phytohemagglutinin on efficiency of in vitro porcine embryo production by somatic cell nuclear transfer or in vitro fertilization. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 74: 1557–1567.10.1002/mrd.20720]Search in Google Scholar
[Haouzi D., Hamamah S.(2009). Pertinence of apoptosis markers for the improvement of in vitro fertilization (IVF) Curr. Med. Chem., 16: 1905–1916.10.2174/092986709788186075]Search in Google Scholar
[Hazeleger W., Kemp B.(2001). Recent developments in pig embryo transfer. Theriogenology, 56: 1321–1331.10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00633-1]Search in Google Scholar
[International Organization for Standardization ISO 10555–1:2013 Intravascular catheters (https://www.iso.org/standard/54884.html).]Search in Google Scholar
[International Organization for Standardization ISO 20696:2018 Sterile urethral catheters for single use (https://www.iso.org/standard/68854.html).]Search in Google Scholar
[Jang S.I., Mok J.Y., Jeon I.H., Park K.H., Nguyen T.T., Park J.S., Hwang H.M., Song M.S., Lee D., Chai K.Y.(2012). Effect of electrospun non-woven mats of dibutyryl chitin/poly(lactic acid) blends on wound healing in hairless mice. Molecules, 17: 2992–3007.10.3390/molecules17032992]Search in Google Scholar
[Kidson A., Rubio-Pomar F.J., Van Knegsel A., Van Tol H.T., Hazeleger W., Ducro-Steverink D.W., Colenbrander B., Dieleman S.J., Bevers M.M.(2004). Quality of porcine blastocysts produced in vitro in the presence or absence of GH. Reproduction, 127: 165–177.10.1530/rep.1.00086]Search in Google Scholar
[Kushnir V.A., Barad D.H., Albertini D.F., Darmon S.K., Gleicher N.(2017). System atic review of wordwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004–2013. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol., 15: 6.10.1186/s12958-016-0225-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee A.M., Connell M.T., Csokmay J.M., Styer A.K.(2016). Elective single embryo transfer –the power of one. Contracept. Reprod. Med., 6: 11.10.1186/s40834-016-0023-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Leszczynski R., Gumula T., Stodolak-Zych E., Pawlicki K., Wieczorek J., Kajor M., Blazewicz S.(2015). Histopathological evaluation of a hydrophobic terpolymer (PTFE-PVD-PP) as an implant material for nonpenetrating very deep sclerectomy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 56: 5203–5209.10.1167/iovs.14-16027]Search in Google Scholar
[Levi Setti P.E., Albani E., Cavagna M., Bulletti C., Colombo G.V., Negri L.(2003). The impact of embryo transfer on implantation – a review. Placenta, 24 Suppl B: 20–26.10.1016/S0143-4004(03)00187-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Lin T., Lee J.E., Oqani R.K., Kim S.Y., Cho E.S., Jeong Y.D., Baek J.J., Jin D.I.(2017). Delayed blastocyst formation or an extra day culture increases apoptosis in pig blastocysts. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 185: 128–139.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.08.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Luo J., Wang W., Sun S.(2019). Research advances in reproduction for dairy goats. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci., 32: 1284–1295.10.5713/ajas.19.0486]Search in Google Scholar
[Maddah H.A.(2016). Polypropylene as a promising plastic: A review. Am. J. Polymer Sci., 6: 1–11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maged A.M., Rashwan H., Abdel Aziz S., Ramadan W., Mostafa W.A.I., Metwally A.A., Katta M.(2018). Randomized controlled trial of the effect of endometrial injury on implantation and clinical pregnancy rates during the first ICSI cycle. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 40: 211–216.10.1002/ijgo.12355]Search in Google Scholar
[Mains L., van Voorhis B.J.(2010). Optimizing the technique of embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril., 94: 785–790.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.030]Search in Google Scholar
[Maitz M.F.(2015). Applications of synthetic polymers in clinical medicine. Biosurf. Biotribol., 15: 161–176.10.1016/j.bsbt.2015.08.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Malikmammadov E., Tanir T.E., Kiziltay A., Hasirci V., Hasirci N.(2018). PCL and PCL-based materials in biomedical applications. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym., 29: 863–893.10.1080/09205063.2017.1394711]Search in Google Scholar
[Martinez M.M., Reif R.D., Pappas D.(2010). Detection of apoptosis: A review of conventional and novel techniques Anal. Methods, 2: 996–1004.10.1039/c0ay00247j]Search in Google Scholar
[Martinez E.A., Martinez C.A., Nohalez A., Sanchez-Osorio J., Vazquez J.M., Roca J., Parrilla I., Gil M.A., Cuello C.(2015). Nonsurgical deep uterine transfer of vitrified, in vivo-derived, porcine embryos is as effective as the default surgical approach. Sci. Rep., 5: 10587.10.1038/srep10587]Search in Google Scholar
[Martins W.P., Nastri C.O., Rienzi L., vander Poel S.Z., Gracia C., Racowsky C.(2017). Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol., 49: 583–591.10.1002/uog.17327]Search in Google Scholar
[Niederberger C., Pellicer A.J., Cohen J., Gardner D.K., Palermo G.D., O’Neill C., Chow S., Rosenwaks Z., Cobo A., Swain J.E., Schoolcraft W.B., Frydman R., Bishop L.A., Aharon D., Gordon C., New E., Decherney A., Tan S.L., Paulson R.J., Goldfarb J.M., Brännström M., Donnez J., Silber S., Dolmans M.M., Simpson J.L., Handyside A.H., MunnéS., Eguizabal C., Montserrat N., Izpisua Belmonte J.C., Trounson A., Simon C., Tulandi T., Giudice L.C., Norman R.J., Hsueh A.J., Sun Y., Laufer N., Kochman R., Eldar-Geva T., Lunenfeld B., Ezcurra D., D’Hooghe T., Fauser B.C.J., Tarlatzis B.C., Meldrum D.R., Casper R.F., Fatemi H.M., Devroey P., Galliano D., Wikland M., Sigman M., Schoor R.A., Goldstein M., Lipshultz L.I., Schlegel P.N., Hussein A., Oates R.D., Brannigan R.E., Ross H.E., Pennings G., Klock S.C., Brown S., Van Steirteghem A., Rebar R.W., La Barbera A.R.(2018). Forty years of IVF. Fertil. Steril., 110: 185–324.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Omidi M., Halvaei I., Mangoli E., Khalili M.A., Razi M.H.(2015). The effect of embryo catheter loading technique on the live birth rate. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med., 42: 175–180.10.5653/cerm.2015.42.4.175]Search in Google Scholar
[Orłowska J., Kurczewska U., Derwińska K., Orłowski W., Orszulak-Michalak D.(2015). The use of biodegradable polymers in design of cellular scaffolds. Postepy Hig. Med. Dosw., 69: 294–301.10.5604/17322693.1142717]Search in Google Scholar
[Peltoniemi O., Björkman S., Oropeza-Moe M., Oliviero C.(2019). Developments of reproductive management and biotechnology in the pig. Anim. Reprod., 16: 524–538.10.21451/1984-3143-AR2019-0055]Search in Google Scholar
[Petters R.M., Wells K.D.(1993). Culture of pig embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl., 48: 61–73.]Search in Google Scholar
[Polish Committee for Standardization (PCS), PN EN ISO-527-3:2019-01 Plastics – Plastics. Determination of mechanical properties (English version: pkn.pl/pn-en-iso-527-3-2019-01e.html).]Search in Google Scholar
[Pomar F.J., Teerds K.J., Kidson A., Colenbrander B., Tharasanit T., Aguilar B., Roelen B.A.(2005). Differences in the incidence of apoptosis between in vivo and in vitro produced blastocysts of farm animal species: a comparative study. Theriogenology, 63: 2254–2268.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.10.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Practice Committeeofthe American Societyfor Reproductive Medicine(ASRM)(2017). Performing the embryo transfer: a guideline. Fertil. Steril., 107: 882–896.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.02528366416]Search in Google Scholar
[Rátky J., Brüssow K.P., Solti L.(1998). Endoscopic methods in swine reproductive research: a review. Acta. Vet. Hung., 46: 487–492.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rátky J., Brüssow K.P., Solti L., Torner H., Sarlós P.(2001). Ovarian response, embryo recovery and results of embryo transfer in a Hungarian native pig breed. Theriogenology, 56: 969–978.10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00623-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruhlmann C., Gnocchi D.C., Cattaneo A.R., Molina L.G., Rivadeneira L.R., Tessari L.Martinez A.G.(2015). Embryo Transfer Catheters: Softer is Easier. JBRA Assist. Reprod., 19: 204–209.10.5935/1518-0557.20150040]Search in Google Scholar
[Sallam H.N.(2005). Embryo transfer: factors involved in optimizing the success. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 17: 289–298.10.1097/01.gco.0000169107.08000.dd]Search in Google Scholar
[Samiec M., Skrzyszowska M.(2015). The use of the methods of intra vitam fluorocytochemical analysis for detection of apoptotic cell death in porcine nuclear donor cells and embryos generated by somatic cell cloning techniques (in Polish). IZ PIB, Rocz. Nauk. Zoot. Monogr. Rozpr., pp. 21–32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schoolcraft W.B.(2016). Importance of embryo transfer technique in maximizing assisted reproductive outcomes. Fertil. Steril., 105: 855–860.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.022]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon A., Laufer N.(2012). Assessment and treatment of repeated implantation failure (RIF) J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 29: 1227–1239.10.1007/s10815-012-9861-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Singh N., Toshyan V., Kumar S., Vanamail P., Madhu M.(2015). Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci., 8: 218–223.10.4103/0974-1208.170401]Search in Google Scholar
[Spitzer D., Haidbauer R., Corn C., Stadler J., Wirleitner B., Zech N.H.(2012). Effects of embryo transfer quality on pregnancy and live birth delivery rates. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 29: 131–135.10.1007/s10815-011-9680-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Stodolak E., Gumula T., Leszczynski R., Wieczorek J., Blazewicz S.(2010). A composite material used as a membrane for ophthalmology applications. Compos. Sci. Technol., 70: 1915–1919.10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Tıras B., Cenksoy P.O.(2014). Practice of embryo transfer: recommendations during and after. Semin. Reprod. Med., 32: 291–296.10.1055/s-0034-1375181]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallenhorst S., Holtz W.(1999). Transfer of pig embryos to different uterine sites. J. Anim. Sci., 77: 2327–2329.10.2527/1999.7792327x]Search in Google Scholar
[Wieczorek J., Koseniuk J., Mandryk I., Poniedziałek-Kempny K.(2015). Piglets born after intrauterine laparoscopic embryo transfer. Pol. J. Vet. Sci., 8: 425–431.10.1515/pjvs-2015-0054]Search in Google Scholar
[Yao Z., Vansteelandt S., Vander Elst J., Coetsier T., Dhont M., De Sutter P.(2009). The efficacy of the embryo transfer catheter in IVF and ICSI is operator-dependent: a randomized clinical trial. Hum. Reprod., 24: 880–887.10.1093/humrep/den453]Search in Google Scholar
[Zheng C., Jian-Tao Z., Hai-Feng L., Hong-Bin W.(2016). Laparoscopic embryo transfer in pigs: knowledge for surgical procedures J. Northeast Agric. Univ., 23: 52–58.10.1016/S1006-8104(16)30047-2]Search in Google Scholar